Implementation of complex protection against risk in machine-building enterprise`s innovations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.96426Keywords:
risks of innovative activity, complex system of protection, risk management, methods of financing of innovation projectsAbstract
The complex system of protection against risks of innovative activity of machine-building enterprise is offered.
The conducted technological audit shows the need to reduce the risks of innovation, caused by a shortage of investment resources.
The methods of financing of innovation projects need to be improved.
This method is based on the achievement by the machine-building enterprise of such criteria as patent purity, rate of profit, license protection, novelty, priority of innovation directions, competitiveness of the introduced technology
The necessity of constant personnel potential building is substantiated (first of all, upgrading the skills of project managers and innovative managers); bringing the material and technical base to modern world standards; use of automatic design systems; involvement of experts in patenting and certification of products.
The conducted research is of practical value for machine-building enterprises because it offers a comprehensive system of protection against risks in innovations, which includes principles: normality, economic validity, complexity, rapid response, continuity, efficiency, adequacy, resource availability, development, administrative management, coordination, professionalism, disclosure of information.
References
- Greve, H. R. (2007). Exploration and exploitation in product innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16 (5), 945–975. doi:10.1093/icc/dtm013
- Cunha, M. P. E., Gomes, J. F. S. (2003). Order and Disorder in Product Innovation Models. Creativity and Innovation Management, 12 (3), 174–187. doi:10.1111/1467-8691.00280
- Hirunyawipada, T., Paswan, A. K. (2006). Consumer innovativeness and perceived risk: implications for high technology product adoption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23 (4), 182–198. doi:10.1108/07363760610674310
- Choi, T. Y., Krause, D. R. (2006). The supply base and its complexity: Implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 24 (5), 637–652. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.07.002
- Im, S., Montoya, M. M., Workman, J. P. (2012). Antecedents and Consequences of Creativity in Product Innovation Teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30 (1), 170–185. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00887.x
- Browning, T. R., Eppinger, S. D. (2002). Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49 (4), 428–442. doi:10.1109/tem.2002.806709
- Markides, C. (2006). Disruptive Innovation: In Need of Better Theory*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23 (1), 19–25. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00177.x
- Illiashenko, S. M. (2010). Stratehichne upravlinnia innovatsiinoiu diialnistiu pidpryiemstva na zasadakh marketynhu innovatsii. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, 12, 111–119.
- Vorobiev, S. N., Baldin, K. V. (2009). Sistemnyi analiz i upravlenie riskami v organizatsii. Moscow: MODEK, 760.
- Griniov, V. F. (2001). Innovatsionnyi menedzhment. Ed. 2. Kyiv: MAUP, 152.
- Ermasova, N. B. (2011). Risk menedzhment organizatsii. Moscow: Nauchnaia kniga, 120.
- Illiashenko, S. M. (2004). Ekonomichnyi ryzyk. Ed. 2. Kyiv: Tsentr navchalnoi literatury, 220.
- Churikanova, O. (2015). Cognitive approach application for the typological classification of regions by level of industrial development. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(7(21)), 28–31. doi:10.15587/2312-8372.2015.38681
- Antoniuk, O. P., Korkhin, A. S. (2015). Research of the interrelationship of basic macroeconomic indicators of Ukraine on the basis of simultaneouse quations. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, 6 (168), 410–416.
- Sydora, T. Yu., Yakovenko, O. H. (2011). Analiz prybutkovoi innovatsiinoi diialnosti promyslovoho pidpryiemstva v umovakh tsyklichnykh ekonomichnykh protsesiv. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, 7 (121), 329–338.
- Bielkina, I. A., Antoniuk, O. P. (2015). Diahnostyka bezpeky tsilisnosti informatsiinoho pidpryiemstva yak sotsialno-ekonomichnoi systemy. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu, 11, 310–312.
- Polins`kyy, O. (2014). Development of risk management activities in innovation activity of engineering enterprise. ScienceRise, 4(1(4)), 47–51. doi:10.15587/2313-8416.2014.28955
- Polins`kyy, O., Shyrin, A. (2016). Risk management in the context of innovation projects implementation at machine-building enterprises. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(3(27)), 54–57. doi:10.15587/2312-8372.2016.59709
- Krylov, E. I., Vlasova, V. M., Zhuravkova, I. V. (2003). Analiz effektivnosti investitsionnoi i innovatsionnoi deiatel'nosti predpriiatiia. Ed. 2. Moscow: Finansy i statistika, 608.
- Stadnyk, V. V., Yokhna, M. A. (2006). Innovatsiinyi menedzhment. Kyiv: Akademvydav, 464.
- Chetyrkin, E. M. (2008). Finansovyi analiz proizvodstvennyh investitsii. Moscow: Delo, 256.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Александр Маркович Полинский
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.