O. Khadzhynova. Planning a production program to ensure the break-even activity of enterprises.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31498/2225-6407.16.2017.136352Keywords:
counterparty enterprises, production programs, production capacity utilization, demand, supply, planning, modeling, break-even activity, profit.Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of models of enterprise production programs planning to ensure break-even activity. The basis for scientific work was the study of outstanding domestic and foreign scientists and their own developments. The aim of the work is to develop a model for coordinated planning of counterparty enterprises’ production programs to ensure break-even activity. Method and methodology of the work - general scientific and special methods were used, in particular, comparisons, scientific abstraction, induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, and the like. This article substantiates the need to introduce a system of coordinated planning of counterparty enterprises’ production activities that should ensure the break-even activity of enterprises. It is proved that in the current conditions of the economy, the interaction of counterpart enterprises is due to mutually beneficial cooperation, and this leads to certain mutual obligations; a list of possible advantages and shortcomings of the enterprise's activity was determined, which is characterized by the specificity of a particular counterparty enterprise. In the article models of industrial activity planning of counterparty enterprises and methodology of construction of coordinated planning system were considered. The use of the model of coordinated planning of production activity allows sequentially and iteratively to solve the following tasks: basic coordinated planning of output in conditions when demand is known; optimal planning, taking into account the randomness of external demand, the results of which are input deterministic parameters for specifying the first; optimization of the systemic criterion of the viability of enterprises by regulating domestic prices for products, ensuring break-even activity. The author proposes a scientific and methodical approach to coordinated planning of counterpart enterprises’ production, which is a complex of economic and mathematical models.
References
1. Багриновский К.А. Основы согласования плановых решений. – М.: Наука, 1977. – 304 с.
2. Бородин А.И. Особенности методов стохастической оптимизации в социально-экономических системах / А. И. Бородин, А. Н. Сорочайкин // Экономические науки. - 2013. - № 4 (101). - С. 151-156.
3. Гранберг А.Г., Суслицын С.А. Введение в системное моделирование народного хозяйства. – Новосибирск: Наука. Сиб. отд-ние, 1988. – 302 с.
4. Ермольев Ю.М., Ястремский А.И. Стохастические модели и методы в экономическом планировании. М.: Наука, 1979. - 253 с.
5. Клейнер Г.Б., Тамбовцев В.Л., Качалов Р.М. Предприятие в нестабильной экономической среде: риски, стратегия, безопасность. – М.: Экономика, 1997. – 482 с.
6. Леонтьев В.В. Межотраслевая экономика; Пер. с англ. – М.: Экономика, 1997. – 480 с.
7. Мадых А.А. Нечеткий подход при моделировании жизнеспособности ПЭС // Модели управления в рыночной экономике: (Сб. науч. тр.) Общ. ред. Ю.Г. Лысенко; Донецкий нац. ун-т. - Донецк: ДонНУ, 2005. – Спец. вып., Т1. – С. 185-194.
8. Моделирование предплановых решений в управлении производством. И.Н. Ляшенко, Н.Н. Клименюк, Д.А. Калишук, А.И. Килиевич. Киев: Изд-во при Киев. ун-те ИО «Вища школа», 1984. – 128 с.
9. Моделирование производственно-сбытовых систем и процессов управления / Под ред. А.А. Колобова, Л.Ф. Шклярского. М.: Изд-во МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана, 1993. – 216 с.
10. Петренко А.А., Петренко В.Л., Лысенко Ю.Г., Орлов А.А. Концепция адаптивного управления рисками в производственно-экономических системах / НАН Украины; Институт экономики промышленности. — Донецк, 1997. — 36 с.
11. St. Beer. Diagnosing the system for organizations. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1985, 1996. – 152 p.
References (BSI):
1. Bagrinovskij K.A. Osnovy soglasovaniya planovyh reshenij. – M.: Nauka, 1977. – 304 s.
2. Borodin A.I. Osobennosti metodov stohasticheskoj optimizacii v social'no-ehkonomicheskih sistemah / A. I. Borodin, A. N. Sorochajkin // EHkonomicheskie nauki. - 2013. - № 4 (101). - S. 151-156.
3. Granberg A.G., Suslicyn S.A. Vvedenie v sistemnoe modelirovanie narodnogo hozyajstva. – Novosibirsk: Nauka. Sib. otd-nie, 1988. – 302 s.
4. Ermol'ev Yu.M., YAstremskij A.I. Stohasticheskie modeli i metody v ehkonomi-cheskom planirovanii. M.: Nauka, 1979. - 253 s.
5. Klejner G.B., Tambovcev V.L., Kachalov R.M. Predpriyatie v nestabil'noj ehkonomicheskoj srede: riski, strategiya, bezopasnost'. – M.: EHkonomika, 1997. – 482 s.
6. Leont'ev V.V. Mezhotraslevaya ehkonomika; Per. s angl. – M.: EHkonomika, 1997. – 480 s.
7. Madyh A.A. Nechetkij podhod pri modelirovanii zhiznesposobnosti PEHS // Modeli upravleniya v rynochnoj ehkonomike: (Sb. nauch. tr.) Obshch. red. YU.G. Lysenko; Doneckij nac. un-t. - Doneck: DonNU, 2005. – Spec. vyp., T1. – S. 185-194.
8. Modelirovanie predplanovyh reshenij v upravlenii proizvodstvom. I.N. Lyashenko, N.N. Klimenyuk, D.A. Kalishuk, A.I. Kilievich. Kiev: Izd-vo pri Kiev. un-te IO «Vishcha shkola», 1984. – 128 s.
9. Modelirovanie proizvodstvenno-sbytovyh sistem i processov upravleniya / Pod red. A.A. Kolobova, L.F. SHklyarskogo. M.: Izd-vo MGTU im. N.EH. Baumana, 1993. – 216 s.
10. Petrenko A.A., Petrenko V.L., Lysenko YU.G., Orlov A.A. Koncepciya adaptivnogo upravleniya riskami v proizvodstvenno-ehkonomicheskih sistemah / NAN Ukrainy; Institut ehkonomiki promyshlennosti. — Doneck, 1997. — 36 s.
11. St. Beer. Diagnosing the system for organizations. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1985, 1996. – 152p.
