THE CONCEPT OF "CORRUPTION OFFENCE" IN CRIMINAL LEGISLATION OF THE CIS STATES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2018.173504Анотація
Abstract.In this article, various approaches to the consolidation of notion of “corruption offence” are
considered with the help of a comparative legal analysis of the content of criminal legislation of Russia and CIS member states. Researchers found that in order to achieve this goal, national legislators use the two following methods: 1) to fix the definition of “corruption offence” in criminal law; 2) to establish a closed list of such unlawful acts. By taking into account the importance of the concept under consideration in the fight against corruption, a conclusion was made about the prospect of its fixing in the criminal laws of all CIS member states.
Keywords: criminal legislation, corruption, corruption offence, criminal law, law.
Посилання
The United Nations Convention against Corruption (Adopted by the UN General Assembly: 31 October 2003, by resolution 58/4).
http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/corruption.shtml/ (accessed: 22 January 2019).
The Agreement on cooperation in fighting against Corruption between the CIS countries' Prosecutors
General on 25 April 2007. http://base.spinform.ru/show_doc.fwx?rgn=28775/ (accessed: 22 January 2019).
Criminal Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan (adopted 1999).
https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/ (accessed: 22 January 2019).
Criminal Code of the Republic of Belarus (adopted 1999). http://cis-
legislation.com/document.fwx?rgn=1977/ (accessed: 22 January 2019).
Criminal Code of the Ukraine (adopted 2001).
https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/ (accessed: 22 January 2019).
Criminal Code of the Republic of Tajikistan (adopted 1998).
https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/ (accessed: 22 January 2019).
Criminal Code of Turkmenistan (adopted 1997). http://cis-legislation.com/document.fwx?rgn=2483/
(accessed: 22 January 2019).
Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan (adopted 1994).
https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/ (accessed: 22 January 2019).
Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan (dated July 16, 1997 # 167).
https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/ (accessed: 22 January 2019).
Criminal Code of the Kyrgyz Republic (adopted 1997).
https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/ (accessed: 22 January 2019).
Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova (adopted 2002).
https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/ (accessed: 22 January 2019).
Law of the Republic of Moldova on Prevention and Fight against Corruption (adopted 2008, had expired).
http://base.spinform.ru/show_doc.fwx?rgn=23553/ (accessed: 22 January 2019).
Law of the Republic of Moldova «About integrity» (adopted 2017). http://cis-
legislation.com/document.fwx?rgn=99995/ (accessed: 22 January 2019).
Model Law «Fundamental principles of legislation on the anti-corruption policy» (Approved by the
Regulation 22-15 during the 22 nd plenary session of Inter-Parliamentary Assembly of the CIS Members, Saint
Petersburg, 15 November 2003). http://docs.cntd.ru/document/901898824/ (accessed: 22 January 2019).
The instruction of the Prosecutor General`s Office of the Russian Federation no. 870/11; the Ministry of
Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation no. 1, 27 December 2017 «About the introduction of the lists of articles of the
Criminal Code of the Russian Federation used in the formation of statistical reporting» (had expired). Reference and
legal system «Consultant Plus», Russia.
The instruction of the Prosecutor General`s Office of the Russian Federation no. 797/11; the Ministry of
Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation no. 2, 13 December 2016 «About the introduction of the lists of articles of the
Criminal Code of the Russian Federation used in the formation of statistical reporting» (had expired). Reference and
legal system «Consultant Plus», Russia.
The instruction of the Prosecutor General`s Office of the Russian Federation no. 744/11; the Ministry of
Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation no. 3, 31 December 2014 «About the introduction of the lists of articles of the
Criminal Code of the Russian Federation used in the formation of statistical reporting» (had expired). Reference and
legal system «Consultant Plus», Russia.
The instruction of the Prosecutor General`s Office of the Russian Federation no. 853/11; the Ministry of
Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation no. 5, 25 December 2018 «About the introduction of the lists of articles of the
Criminal Code of the Russian Federation used in the formation of statistical reporting». Reference and legal system
«Consultant Plus», Russia.
Acemoglu D. 2003. Why Not a Political Coase Theorem? Social Conflict, Commitment, and Politics. Journal of Comparative Economics. Vol. 31. # 4. pp. 620-652.
Ahmetova G.R. 2002. Korrupcia v neftedobivaushih stranah: uchebnoe posobie. Almaty: Kulzhakhan. 150 p. (In Russian)
Amundsen Inge. Political Corruption: An Introduction to the Issues. WP 1999: 7. pp. 21-22.
Burtsev A.S., Genzyuk E.E., Lukyanchikova E.F., Mironuk I.V., Prokhorova M.L. 2018. Legal Certainty of legality principle in the legislation of the continental and anglo-american system. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication – TOJDAC. March Special Edition. pp. 231-234.
Fabio Monteduro, Sandro Brunell, Andrea Buratti. La corruzione. Definizione, misurazione e impatti economici / Pezzutoll volume riporta gli esiti di una Ricerca, conclusasi a marzo 2013, realizzata nell'ambitodel progetto E.T.I.CA. pubblica nel Sud: accrescere l'Efficacia, la Trasparenza, l'Innovazionee la Capability
dell'Amministrazione Pubblica. http://focus.formez.it/content/etica-pubblica-nel-sud/ (accessed: 22 January 2019).
Halyapin V.V. 2015. Analyz metodov protivodeistviya korrupcii v gosudarstvennyh organah. Region: Gosudarstvennoe i municipalnoe upravlenie. Vol. 3 (03). pp. 1-17. (In Russian)
Kathleen F. Brickey. 2006. Corporate & White Collar Crime: Cases And Materials, Aspen Publishers. p. 87.
Mungiu-Pippidi А. 2003. Korrupciya: problemy kultury ili nepodkontrolnosti chinovnikam obshestvu?
Konstitucionnoe pravo: vostochnoevropeiskoe obozrenie. Vol. 2 (43). pp. 26-27. (In Russian).
Nye J.S. 1967. Corruption and Political Development: A Cost-Benet Analysis, American Political Science Review. Vol. 61. # 2. pp. 417-427.
Pope J. 2000. Confronting corruption: The elements of a National Integrity System. The TI Source Book.
Verhoturov А.А. 2018. Ponyatie korrupcii: sushestvuyushie podhody // Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya justiciya. Vol 4. pp. 15-17. (In Russian).
Volzhenkin B.V. 2000. Korrupciya v Rossii. Criminologiya – XX vek. Pod red. V.N. Burlakov, V.P. Salnikov. SPb. p. 365. (In Russian).
Vцlkel K. , Stark C. und Chwojka R. 2007. Korruption im цffentlichen Dienst. Norderstedt.
Wanless M. 2013. The Word Bank`s fight against corruption: See nothing, hear nothing, say nothing. Hydra. Vol. 1. # 2. pp. 38-48.
Shalagin А.Е. 2015. Prioritetnye napravleniya preduprezhdeniya korrupcionnoy prestupnosti na sovremennom etape. Ugolovnoe pravo i criminologiya. Vol. 1 (19). pp. 63-67. (In Russian)
Shishkarev S.N. 2009. Protivodeistvie korrupcii: teotiya i praktika. М. p. 168. (In Russian)
##submission.downloads##
Номер
Розділ
Ліцензія
Автори, які публікуються у цьому журналі, погоджуються з наступними умовами:
1. Автори залишають за собою право на авторство своєї роботи та передають журналу право першої публікації цієї роботи на умовах ліцензії Creative Commons Attribution License, котра дозволяє іншим особам вільно розповсюджувати опубліковану роботу з обов'язковим посиланням на авторів оригінальної роботи та першу публікацію роботи у цьому журналі.
2. Автори мають право укладати самостійні додаткові угоди щодо неексклюзивного розповсюдження роботи у тому вигляді, в якому вона була опублікована цим журналом (наприклад, розміщувати роботу в електронному сховищі установи або публікувати у складі монографії), за умови збереження посилання на першу публікацію роботи у цьому журналі.
3.Політика журналу дозволяє і заохочує розміщення авторами в мережі Інтернет (наприклад, у сховищах установ або на особистих веб-сайтах) рукопису роботи, як до подання цього рукопису до редакції, так і під час його редакційного опрацювання, оскільки це сприяє виникненню продуктивної наукової дискусії та позитивно позначається на оперативності та динаміці цитування опублікованої роботи.
