DOI: https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2019.177524

Administrative culture of human relations

Elena Kovalenko

Abstract


The purpose of the work is a theory and methodology analysis of administrative culture of human relations in the epoch of industrial which will be instrumental in enriching of science new knowledges about the cultures of management in the context of development of civilization. Methodological basis of research is dialectical principle of cognition, sociocultural and historical approaches of the systems, fundamental positions of theory and history of management culture. The scientific and interdisciplinary methods of research are used: analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, comparison, formalization. The scientific novelty of the got results consists in an exposure and generalization of features of administrative culture of human relations of industrial society. Conclusions. As a result of research found out such the features of administrative culture of human relations of epoch of industrial, as: at first, waiver of engineering approach to the management, at which a man was part of production line; secondly, in a counterbalance to mechanistic conception of «economic man» which reacts only on incentives of wages, conception of «social man», which assumes that, went out on the first plan, except for a financial benefit, a worker aspires to satisfaction of moral necessities; thirdly, the main object of attention is a worker as personality and that is why to each individual approach is needed; fourthly, any formal organization with the officially set rules and orders is necessarily complemented informal organization, based on the moral aspects of co-operation; fifthly, transition vid hard regulation to democratization of management, humane relationships with inferiors, to respect of their idea, group decision-making; knot, consideration of management as to the process of co-operation of people, the tasks of which are taken to the study of relations of interpersonalities; seven, account of emotional factor and interests of worker, and also options of groups and traditions.


Keywords


administrative culture; human relations; industrial society

References


Барнард Ч. Функции руководителя: власть, стимулы и ценности в организации. Пер. с англ. Москва : Социум, 2014. 336 с.

Друкер П. Управление в обществе будущего. Пер. с англ. Москва : Вильямс, 2007. 320 с.

Мартинишин Я. М., Коваленко Є. Я. Мистецтво управління й освітні технології підготовки менеджерів соціокультурної діяльності. Біла Церква : Видавець Пшонківський О. В., 2018. 374 с.

Мартинишин Я. М., Коваленко Є. Я. Смисли в культурі управління. Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтв. 2017. № 4. С. 26–31.

Мартинишин Я. М., Коваленко Є. Я. Формування сучасної системи управління життєдіяльністю суспільства. Вісник Київського національного університету культури і мистецтв. Серія: Менеджмент соціокультурної діяльності. 2018. Вип. 1. С. 7–24.

Минцберг Г. Создание эффективной организации. Пер. с англ. Санкт-Петербург : Питер, 2011. 502 с.

Follett M. P. Dynamic Administration : The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett. Eastford : Martino Fine Books, 2014. 322 р.

Follett M. P. Freedom and Co-ordination : Lectures in business organization. London : Routledge, 2013. 112 р.

Hamel G. The Future of Management. Boston : Harvard Business School Press, 2007. 255 с.

Mayo E. The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization. London : Routledge, 2003. 204 р.

Mayo E. The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization. London : Routledge, 2008. 174 р.

Münsterberg H. Psychology and Industrial Efficiency. Atlanta : Serenity Publishers, 2011. 166 р.

Roethlisberger F. J. Man in Organization. Cambridge : Harvard University Press, 1968. 322 р.

Roethlisberger F. J. Management and Morale. Cambridge : Harvard University Press, 1965. 194 р.

Barnard, C. (2014). Functions of the leader: power, incentives and values in the organization. (Trans. Eng.). Moscow: Sotsium [in Russian].

Druker, P. (2007). Managing in the society of the future. (Trans. in Eng.). Moscow: Vil'iams [in Russian].

Martynyshyn, Y. M., & Kovalenko, Y. Y. (2018). Art of management and educational technologies of preparation of managers of of social and cultural activity. Bila Tserkva: Vydavets O. V. Pshonkivskyj [in Ukrainian].

Martynyshyn, Y. M., & Kovalenko, Y. Y. (2017). The measures in culture of management. Visnyk Natsional'noi akademii kerivnykh kadriv kul'tury i mystetstv, 4, 26-31 [in Ukrainian].

Martynyshyn, Y. M., & Kovalenko, Y. Y. (2018). Formation of the modern system management of life society. Visnyk Kyivs'koho natsional'noho universytetu kul'tury i mystetstv. Seriia: Menedzhment sotsiokul'turnoi diial'nosti, 1, 7-24 [in Ukrainian].

Mintsberg, G. (2011). Creation of an effective organization. (Trans. Eng.) St. Petersburg: Piter [in Russian].

Follett, M. P. (2014). Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett. Eastford: Martino Fine Books.

Follett, M. P. (2013). Freedom and Co-ordination: Lectures in business organization. London: Routledge.

Hamel, G. (2007). The Future of Management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Mayo, E. (2003). The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization. London: Routledge.

Mayo, E. (2008). The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization. London: Routledge.

Münsterberg, H. (2011). Psychology and Industrial Efficiency. Atlanta: Serenity Publishers.

Roethlisberger, F. J. (1968). Man in Organization. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Roethlisberger, F. J. (1965). Management and Morale. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.