DEVELOPING QUALITY ASSESSMENTS OF ORAL SPEECH IN ENGLISH

Authors

  • Olga Kvasova Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2663-0303.2017.1.03

Keywords:

speaking test, test construct, assessment criteria, rating scale

Abstract

Background: Oral speech in a foreign language is an issue the theoreticians and practitioners has been discussing for decades and which has gained particular importance in today’s globalized world. Teaching and assessing English language oral skills is now being implemented in compliance with the Common European Framework of Reference. However, assess­ing oral speech has been so far in the focus of studies almost exclusively outsideUkraine which makes these issues crucial in the national context. The complexity of developing oral tests has impeded the introduction of oral part in the Independent school-leaving exam; university teachers have to themselves develop tests for summative assessment without being trained in test designing; PhD students make claims about effectiveness of their research based on the oral tests of disputable quality.

Purpose: The current paper aims to initiate a discussion on ensuring quality assessment of oral skills in the institutions of higher education in the country. The author examines the construct of oral skills based on the definitions provided in the works of leading experts in applied linguistics and in Common European Framework of Reference. She further proposes a profile of B2 level oral skills based on the Syllabus for teaching English as a second foreign language to students majoring in Oriental languages in theInstitute of Philology in Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.

Results: The author provides a profound analysis of the Syllabus and the course book it is based on, and specifies their strengths and weaknesses thereby outlining the issues of major concern for practitioners. One of them is rooted in the absence in the Teacher’s resource pack of ready-made oral tests for summative assessment which entails versatile approaches to mea­suring students’ achievements by different teachers and therefore not reliable outcomes of testing. As a result of the scrutiny of the sources (CEFR, specifications of internationally acclaimed examinations and the Syllabus), the author comes up with the characteristics of oral production and oral interaction relevant for the learning context.

Discussion: The B2 profile of oral skills defined by the author allowed her to develop analytical rating scales for assess­ing oral monologue. These scales benchmark the oral production against the four criteria (Efficiency of speech, Fluency and phonological control; Control of vocabulary and register; Grammatical control). To become a reliable tool for assessing oral production, these scales should be piloted in the classroom, discussed by the teachers/examiners and modified if necessary. The further perspective of the study relates to developing rating scales to assess oral interaction and eventual introduction of these scales in the instruction.

Author Biography

Olga Kvasova, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

PhD, Associate Professor,

Department of Teaching Methodology of Ukrainian and Foreign Languag­es and Literatures, Institute of Philology

References

Alderson, J. Charles. Assessing Reading.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2005. Print.

Alderson J.Charles and Neus Figueras, Henk Kuijper, Guenter Nold, Sauli Takala, Claire Tardieu.“Analysing Tests of Reading and Listening in Relation to the Common European Framework of Reference: The Experience of the Dutch CEFR Construct Project” // Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(1), 2006. 3–30. Print.

Bachman L.F., A. Palmer. Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Print.

Canale, M and Swain M. “Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing”. Applied Linguistics, 1980, 1, (1). 1–47. Print.

Csépes I., Együd G. The Speaking Handbook. Into Europe. Series editor: J. Charles Alderson. Print.

Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching and Assessment. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. 2001. Print.

De Jong, Nivja H. “Fluency in second language assessment”. In Dina Tsagari& Jayanti Banerjee (Eds.) Handbook of second language assessment.Mouton De Gruyter, 2016. 203–218. Print.

Fulcher, Glen. Testing Second Language Speaking. Longman. 2003. Print.

Fulcher Glen, Davidson Frank, Kemp Jenny. Effective rating scale development for speaking tests: Performance Decision Trees. Language Testing January 2011 vol. 28 no.1. 5–29. Print.

Harris, David P. Testing English as a second language. – New York: MacGraw Hill Book Company, 1969. Print.

Lado, Robert. Language testing: the construction and use of foreign language tests: a teacher’s book.Longmans, 1961.Print.

Luoma, Saari. Assessing speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Print.

The CEFR Grid for Speaking. ALTE CEFR SIG. 2014. Web. 17 Apr. 2016.

Ukrainska, Olga. Metodyka testuvannia rivnia sformovanosti movlennevoi kompetentsiimaybutnih vykladachiv u hovorinni frantsuz’koyu movoyu [Methods of testing futureFrench teachers’ competence in speaking]. Kyiv: Kyiv National Linguistic University, PhD Thesis, 2009.

University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations. Assessing Speaking Performance – Level B2. Web. 17 Apr. 2016.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-20

How to Cite

Kvasova, O. (2017). DEVELOPING QUALITY ASSESSMENTS OF ORAL SPEECH IN ENGLISH. Ars Linguodidacticae, (1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.17721/2663-0303.2017.1.03

Issue

No. 1 (2017)

Section

RESEARCH PAPERS

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Ольга Квасова

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright policy according to the terms of the license: Creative Commons "Attribution-NonCommercial" 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Authors who publish their articles in "Ars Linguodidacticae" (Open Access Journal) retain the following rights:

  1. The authors retain the copyright of their article and grant the Ars Linguodidacticae journal the right to first publish the manuscript of their article under the Creative Commons (CC BY-NC 4.0) Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published work with mandatory reference to the author of the original work and first original publication in the Ars Linguodidacticae journal. An indication of the retention of the copyright of the work is provided on the title page of the article.
  2. The authors reserve the right to enter into separate contracts for the non-exclusive distribution of their article as published in Ars Linguodidacticae (e.g., placing the article in electronic libraries, archives and catalogs or publishing it as part of institute collections and monographs), provided that a full reference to the first original publication in Ars Linguodidacticae is given.
  3. The policy of the "Ars Linguodidacticae" journal allows and encourages authors to post a manuscript both before and during editorial processing, as this promotes productive scientific discussion and has a positive effect on the speed and dynamics of citing the article.

The editorial board reserves publishing rights to:

- the collated original articles and to the entire issue of the journal.

-  the design of the journal and original illustrative and supplementary materials.

- the reprint reprints of the Journal in printed and electronic form.

The copyright policy is carried out according to the terms of the license: Creative Commons "Attribution-NonCommercial" 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

For more information, please read the full text of the CC BY-NC 4.0 Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.