CRITERIA TO ASSESS COMMUNICATIVE FL COMPETENCE IN MONOLOGUE PRODUCTION OF ECONOMICS MAJORS IN THE PROCESS OF AUDIOVISUAL IMPLICIT SPECIALIZATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2663-0303.2019.3.04

Keywords:

audiovisual implicit specialization, video, socio-cultural and professionally oriented communicative foreign language competence, assessment criteria, monologue production, lexical units of socio-cultural and economic registers, students majoring in Economics.

Abstract

Background: Professionally oriented training implies involvement of professional knowledge and job-related skills. However, non-linguistics majors at the primary stage of tertiary education have no experience in specialism-related areas and situations. As a result, they fail to communicate effectively in the professional environment. To solve the problem, E. Miroshnichenko has introduced ‘implicit specialization’, i.e. integrated development of socio-cultural and professionally oriented communicative FL competence in non-professional communication spheres. The researcher implements her teaching strategy based on printed materials, whereas the author of this paper advocates a somewhat different approach: communicative competence in English can be acquired through audiovisual implicit specializing.

Purpose. The assessment system is an integral and essential part of teaching and learning. It should provide valid and reliable measures for evaluating communicative FL competence. The purpose of our research is to develop assessment criteria for measuring the development of communicative FL competence in monologue production in the process of audiovisual implicit specializing of would-be economists.

Results. Given non-linguistics specialization of students, their FL proficiency level and primary stage of tertiary education, we offer the following criteria to assess communicative FL competence: 1) relevance of a monologue to the communicative situation; 2) accuracy and appropriateness of vocabulary; 3) pronunciation accuracy; 4) grammar accuracy and range of grammatical structures; 5) speech tempo; 6) number of simple and compound sentences in the utterance. In the context of communicative approach, when assessing accuracy and appropriateness of language use, it is essential to take notice only of those lexical, grammatical and phonetic mistakes that distort the meaning and interfere with students’ ability to produce comprehensible utterances. To illustrate the assessment procedure, the article provides some assignments and samples of students’ answers.

Discussion. Application of the above-mentioned criteria to assess socio-cultural and professionally oriented communicative FL competence in monologue production of Economics majors verifies practicability of communicative FL competence development based on audiovisual implicit specializistion. Situational models of communication incorporating lexical units of economic register in non-professional communication presented in videos are of primary importance for successful development of lexical competence both at the primary and follow-up stages of tertiary education. Pronunciation standards provided by video facilitate the qualitative upgrading of pronunciation skills

Author Biography

Nataliia Lutkovska, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Assistant Professor of Foreign Languages for Natural Sciences Department within the Institute of Philology, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.

Areas of research interests include implicit specializing, teaching non-linguistic students through video, role-playing activities.

References

Asadchykh, O. V. (2007). Metodyka Navchannia Studentiv Movnykh Spetsialnostei Usnoho

Yaponskoho Monolohichnoho Movlennia na Pochatkovomu Etapi (Methodology of Teaching Linguistic Students Oral Speech Production in Japanese at the Primary Stage of Education). Diss.

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv,

Print.

Bakayeva, G. and Borysenko, O. (2005).

Programa z Angliyskoyi Movy dlia Profesiynoho

Spilkuvannia (English for Specific Purposes. National Curriculum for Universities). Kyiv: Lenvit,

Print.

Fedorova, I. A. (2006). Navchannia Maibutnikh Ekonomistiv-Mizhnarodnykiv Profesiyno

Spriamovanoho Anglomovnoho Monolohu-Povidomlennia (Teaching Future International Economists Profession Oriented English Monologue

Message). Diss. Kyiv National Linguistic University. Print.

Liamzina, N. K. (2015). Metodyka Navchannia

Maibutnikh Ekonomistiv Profesiyno Orientovanoho Angliyskoho Monolohichnoho Movlennia

z Vykorystanniam Informatsiyno-Komunikatsiynykh Tekhnolohiy (Methodology of Teaching

Future Economists Profession Oriented English

Oral Speech Production with Information and

Communication Technologies). Diss. Kostiantyn Ushinskyi National Pedagogic University of

Southern Ukraine. Print.

Kirzhner, S. E. (2009). Navchannia Maibutnikh Yurystiv Usnoho Profesiyno Spriamovanoho Angliyskoho Monolohichnoho Movlennia z

Vykorystanniam Avtentychnoyi Videofonogramy

(Teaching Future Lawyers Profession Oriented

English Oral Speech Production with Authentic

Video). Diss. Kyiv National Linguistic University.

Print.

Miroshnichenko, E. V. (1996). Obuchenie

Professionalnoy Leksike Studentov-Ekonomistov pri Ustnorechevom obshchenii v Neprofessionalnykh Sferakh Kommunikatsyi (Teaching

Students of Economics Professional Terminology

in Non-professional Spheres of Oral Communicaion). Diss. Kyiv National Linguistic University.

Print.

Paschuk, V. S. (2002). Navchannia Studentiv Movnykh Spetsialnostei Usnoho Angliyskoho

Monolohichnoho Movlennia z Vykorystanniam

Avtentychnykh Khudozhnikh Filmiv (Teaching

Linguistic Students English Oral Speech Production with Authentic Feature Films). Diss. Kyiv National Linguistic University. Print.

Skalkin, V. (1983). Obuchenie Monologicheskomu Vyskazyvaniyu (Teaching Oral Speech

Production). Kyiv: Rad. Shkola. Print.

Published

2019-06-25

How to Cite

Lutkovska, N. (2019). CRITERIA TO ASSESS COMMUNICATIVE FL COMPETENCE IN MONOLOGUE PRODUCTION OF ECONOMICS MAJORS IN THE PROCESS OF AUDIOVISUAL IMPLICIT SPECIALIZATION. Ars Linguodidacticae, (3), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.17721/2663-0303.2019.3.04

Issue

Section

THEORY AND METHODOLOGY OF TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE IN SECONDARY AND TERTIARY SCHOOL