ETHICS OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2409-9805.3.2017.150330Keywords:
ethical policy of the publication, COPE, international standards of publication ethics, academic integrity, , plagiarism, citation, self-citationAbstract
Abstract. The purpose of the work. The research is related to the questions of the ethical policy of the scientific periodicals and main recommendations of the Committee on the Ethics of COPE publications. Its main purpose is to inform Ukrainian authors and to ensure compliance with these requirements by the editorial boards of national publications, because it is a prerequisite for indexing by global science-computer databases, and international publications of domestic authors. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the study and systematization of English-language information, which due to the lack of Ukrainian-language sources has not been enough covered in Ukraine. The research methodology consists in analysis methods, in particular for English-language sources, descriptive and comparative. There were determined criteria for the refusal of article publishing, unfair practice of individual publishing houses and author’s responsibility for the research publication. The research describes the types of plagiarism and the process of recalling an article. The attention was paid to the issue of academic integrity and its implementation in Ukraine and the rules of citation and self-citation. The article states the basic concepts of open access and the traditional model of scientific journals and gives criteria for identifying questionable publishers and “Jeffrey Bill’s black list”. Conclusions. The issue of the ethics of scientific publications abroad is clearly regulated and standardized. In Ukraine, only the top editions carefully adhere to the requirements. Therefore, the issue of using the Creative Commons open access licenses in Ukraine, self-archiving of the data set and own publications, and the conclusion of copyright agreements across the country provides prospects for further researches.
References
Борисова Т. Ефективне представлення результатів досліджень у відкритому доступі [Електронний
ресурс] : презентація до тренінгу, що проходив у Наукові бібліотеці НаУКМА, 27 жовтня 2016 р. / Тетяна
Борисова. – Режим доступу: https://www.slideshare.net/TetianaBorysova/ss-67733586 (Дата звернення:
08.2017). – Назва з екрана.
Капіца Ю. М. Використання знака охорони авторського права у наукових періодичних виданнях
та монографіях // Наука України у світовому інформаційному просторі. – 2016. – № 13. – С. 49–61.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/akademperiodyka.321.049
Капіца Ю. М., Шахбазян К. С. Застосування ліцензій відкритого доступу при розміщенні
матеріалів наукових журналів в електронному середовищі / Ю. М. Капіца, К. С. Шахбазян // Наука
України у світовому інформаційному просторі. – 2016. – № 13. – С. 62–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/
akademperiodyka.321.062
Назаровець С. Підтримка руху відкритого доступу в українському бібліотекознавстві [Електронний
ресурс] / С. Назаровець // Вісник Книжкової палати. – 2013. – № 2. – С. 24–27. – Режим доступу: http://
nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vkp_2013_2_8
Проект сприяння академічній доброчесноті в Україні (Strengthening Academic Integrity in Ukraine
Project – SAIUP) [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://www.saiup.org.ua/pro-proekt/ (Дата
звернення: 11.08.2017). – Назва з екрана.
Ярошенко, Т. Відкритий доступ – шлях до присутності України у світовій науковій спільноті /
Тетяна Ярошенко // Вища школа. – 2011. – № 3. – С. 47–51.
Ярошенко, Т. Зелений шлях відкритого доступу. Репозитарії та їх роль у науковій комунікації:
перші двадцять років / Тетяна Ярошенко // Бібліотечний вісник. – 2011. – № 5. – С. 3–10.
Beall’s List: Potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers [Електронний
ресурс] / Internet Archive. – Режим доступу: https://web.archive.org/web/20170111172306/https://scholarlyoa.
com/publishers/ (Дата звернення: 11.08.2017). – Назва з екрана.
Budd, J. M., Sievert, M., Schultz, T. R. Phenomena of retraction / J. M. Budd M. Sievert T. R. Schultz
// JAMA. – 1998. – V. 280. – P. 296–297.
Опришко Т.С.
Committeeon Publication Ethics [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: https://publicationethics.
org/files/u2/01A_Redundant_Submitted.pdf (Дата звернення: 10.08.2017). – Назва з екрана.
Committeeon Publication Ethics [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://publicationethics.
org/files/u2/04A_Author_Add_Submitted.pdf (Дата звернення: 10.08.2017). – Назва з екрана.
Committeeon Publication Ethics [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://publicationethics.
org/files/u2/04B_Author_Remove_Submitted.pdf (Дата звернення: 10.08.2017). – Назва з екрана.
Crawford, W. Open Access: What You Need to Know Now / W. Crawford. – Chicago: ALA Editions,
– 80 с.
Criteria for Determining Predatory Open Access Publishers [Електронний ресурс] / Internet Archive.
– 2015. – Режим доступу: https://web.archive.org/web/20170105195017/https://scholarlyoa.files.wordpress.
com/2015/01/criteria-2015.pdf (Дата звернення: 11.08.2017). – Назва з екрана.
Hoorn, E., VanderGraaf, M. Copyright Issuesin Open Access Research Journals [Електронний ресурс]
/ E. Hoorn, M. VanderGraf // D-LibMagazine. – 2006. – 12(2). – Режим доступу: http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/
february2006-vandergraaf (Дата звернення: 11.08.2017).
Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? [Електронний ресурс]
// The Guardian. – 2017. – 27 червня. – Режим доступу: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/
profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science?CMP=share_btn_tw (Дата звернення: 11.08.2017).
– Назва з екрана.
Johnston, D. J. Open Access Policies and Academic Freedom: Understanding and Addressing Conflicts
[Електронний ресурс] / D. J. Johnston // Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. – 2017. – №
– Режим доступу: http://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2104 (Дата звернення: 11.08.2017).
McCleary T. Academic Writing [Електронний ресурс] / T. McCleary. – Режим доступу: https://www.
youtube.com/watch?v=bTkzAUV2DOc (Дата звернення: 11.08.2017). – Назва з екрана.
Nath, S. B., Marcus, S. C., Druss, B. G. Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes?
/ S. B. Nath, S. C. Marcus, B. G. Druss // MJA. – 2006. – V. 185. – С.152–154.
Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing [Електронний ресурс] / Committeeon
Publication Ethics (COPE). – Режим доступу: http://publicationethics.org/files/Principles_of_Transparency_
and_Best_Practice_in_Scholarly_Publishing.pdf (Дата звернення: 11.08.2017). – Назва з екрана.
Promoting integrity in research and its publication [Електронний ресурс] / Committeeon Publication
Ethics. Режим доступу: https://publicationethics.org/ (Дата звернення: 11.08.2017). – Назва з екрана.
Schlosser, M. Write up! A Study of Copyright Information on Library-Published Journals [Електронний
ресурс] / M. Schlosser // Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. – 2016. – № 4. Режим
доступу: http://dx.doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2110(Дата звернення: 10.08.2017).
Schultz, T. Opening Up Communication: Assessing Open Access Practices in the Communication
Studies Discipline [Електронний ресурс] / T. Schultz // Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication.
– 2017. – № 5. – Режим доступу: https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2131 (Дата звернення: 11.08.2017).
Wager, E., & Kleinert, S. Responsible research publication: international standards for authors : A position
statement developed at the 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity, Singapore, July 22-24, 2010 [Електронний
ресурс] / E. Wager, S. Kleinert. – 2010. – Режим доступу: https://publicationethics.org/files/International%20
standards_authors_for%20website_11_Nov_2011.pdf (Дата звернення: 11.08.2017). – Назва з екрана.
Borysova, T. (2016, October). Efektyvne predstavlennia rezultativ doslidzhen u vidkrytomu dostupi.
Prezentatsiia do treninhu, shcho prokhodyv u Naukovi bibliotetsi NaUKMA [Effective presentation of research
results in open access. Presentation to the training held at the NaUKMA Scientific Library]. Retrieved from:
https://www.slideshare.net/TetianaBorysova/ss-67733586 [in Ukrainian].
Budd, J. M., Sievert, M., & Schultz, T. R. (1998). Phenomena of retraction. JAMA, 280, 296–297 [in
English].
Committeeon Publication Ethics (COPE). (2014). Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in
Scholarly Publishing. Retrieved from: http://publicationethics.org/files/Principles_of_Transparency_and_
Best_Practice_in_Scholarly_Publishing.pdf [in English].
Committeeon Publication Ethics. (n. d). Retrieved from: http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/04B_
Author_Remove_Submitted.pdf [in English].
Committeeon Publication Ethics. (n. d). Retrieved from: http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/01A_
Redundant_Submitted.pdf [in English].
Committeeon Publication Ethics. (n. d). Retrieved from: http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/04A_
Author_Add_Submitted.pdf [in English].
Crawford, W. (2011). Open Access : What You Need to Know Now. Chicago, IL: ALA Editions [in
English].
Hoorn, E., & VanderGraaf, M. (2006, February). Copyright Issues in Open Access Research Journals.
D-Lib Magazine, 12(2). Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/february2006-vandergraaf [in English].
Internet Archive. (2015). Criteria for Determining Predatory Open Access Publishers. Retrived from:
pdf [in English].
Internet Archive. (n. d.). Beall’s List: Potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly openaccess
publishers. Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/20170111172306/https://scholarlyoa.com/
publishers/ [in English].
Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? (2017, June 27). The
Guardian. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientificpublishing-
bad-for-science?CMP=share_btn_tw [in English].
Johnston, D. J. (2017). Open Access Policies and Academic Freedom: Understanding and
Addressing Conflicts. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 5. Retrieved from: http://doi.
org/10.7710/2162-3309.2104 [in English].
Kapitsa, Yu. M. (2016). Vykorystannia znaka okhorony avtorskoho prava u naukovykh periodychnykh
vydanniakh ta monohrafiiakh [Use of copyright symbol for research journals and academic monographs].
Nauka Ukrainy u svitovomu informatsiinomu prostori, 13, 49–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/
akademperiodyka.321.049 [in Ukrainian].
Kapitsa, Yu. M., & Shakhbazian, K. S. (2016). Zastosuvannia litsenzii vidkrytoho dostupu pry
rozmishchenni materialiv naukovykh zhurnaliv v elektronnomu seredovyshchi [Application of open access
licenses, while placing materials of scientific magazines into electronic environment]. Nauka Ukrainy u
svitovomu informatsiinomu prostori, 13, 62–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/akademperiodyka.321.062 [in
Ukrainian].
McCleary, T. (2017, August 11). Academic Writing. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=bTkzAUV2DOc [in English].
Nath, S. B, Marcus, S. C., & Druss, B. G. (2006). Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or
mistakes? MJA,185, 152–154 [in English].
Nazarovets, S. (2013). Pidtrymka rukhu vidkrytoho dostupu v ukrainskomu bibliotekoznavstvi
[Support for the open access movement in the Ukrainian library science]. Visnyk Knyzhkovoi palaty, 2, 24–27.
Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vkp_2013_2_8 [in Ukrainian].
Proekt spryyannya akademichnyy dobrochesnoti v Ukrayini (Strengthening Academic Integrity in Ukraine
Project – SAIUP). Retrieved from: http://www.saiup.org.ua/pro-proekt/ [in Ukrainian].
Promoting integrity in research and its publication. Retrieved from: https://publicationethics.org/ [in
English].
Schlosser. (2016). Write up! A Study of Copyright Information on Library-Published Journals. Journal
of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 4. Retrived from: http://dx.doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2110
[in English].
Schultz, T. (2017). Opening Up Communication: Assessing Open Access Practices in the Communication
Studies Discipline. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 5. (General Issue). Retrieved from:
https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2131 [in English].
Wager, E.,& Kleinert, S .(2010, July). Responsible research publication: international standards for
authors. A position statement developed at the 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity, Singapore, July
-24, 2010. Retrieved from: https://publicationethics.org/files/International%20standards_authors_for%20
website_11_Nov_2011.pdf [in English].
Yaroshenko, T. (2011). Vidkrytyi dostup – shliakh do prysutnosti Ukrainy u svitovii naukovii spilnoti
[Open access is the path to Ukraine’s presence in the world scientific community]. Vyshcha shkola, 3, 47–51
[in Ukrainian].
Yaroshenko, T. (2011). Zelenyi shliakh vidkrytoho dostupu. Repozytarii ta yikh rol u naukovii
komunikatsii : pershi dvadtsiat rokiv [Green Way of Open Access. Repositories and their role in scientific
communication: the first twenty years]. Bibliotechnyi visnyk, 5, 3–10 [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Tetyana Opryshko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).