ABSTRACT AND ANNOTATION: UPDATING AND REVISION OF REGULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

Authors

  • Lesia Pizniuk
  • Zoriana Sverdlyk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2409-9805.2.2020.221161

Keywords:

Key words, standard, DSTU, GOST, abstract, annotation, scientific article, term.

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to consider on the basis of state standards and requirements of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, the Higher Attestation Commission, how the interpretation and use of the abstract in scientific communication have changed, focusing on the abstract accompanying
the scientific document (article). The research methodology is to apply a systematic approach to the interpretation of the abstract and annotation, given the chronology of the normalization of these concepts by different state standards. The article also implements the method of terminological analysis, as it is
the interpretation of the concepts of “abstract” and “annotation”, their characteristics formed the basis of the study. Scientific novelty. The article substantiates the need to harmonize the requirements of the
current Ukrainian legal framework for the design and presentation of the text of the abstract. Emphasis is placed on the inconsistency of state standards and regulations of relevant state institutions on the structure, content, and scope of articles. Conclusions. An analysis of state standards that contain interpretations,
requirements for the design and scope of the annotation and abstract gives grounds to argue that these are two different concepts. The examples of interpretation of the abstract and annotation are given in the research, the comparative analysis of these two concepts showed obvious differences between them, which, in turn, should not lead to their synonymy or substitution. Nevertheless, in the editorial requirements of professional journals for scientific publications, the requirements of the Ministry of Education and Science
for the defense of dissertations, the boundaries between the concept of “abstract” and “annotation” are leveled, they become interchangeable. Thus, the problems of synonymization of the abstract and annotation outlined in the article, which exist today in the scientific environment of Ukraine, require scientificmethodical
and normative revision of norms and requirements, harmonization with modern international and European experience.

References

Varenko, V. M. & Horbunova О. V. (2016). Reference case. Kyiv: Vyd-vo «Tsentr uchbovoi literatury», 196 p. [in Ukrainian].

Hinzburh, М. (2018). Typical syntactic constructions of European standards and their translation in to Ukrainian. Visnyk Nats. un-tu «Lvivska politekhnika». Seriia «Problemy ukrainskoi terminolohii», 890, 3–14 [in Ukrainian].

Hinzburh, М. (2009). Regarding syntactic errors in normative documents: practical conclusions from the recommendations of linguists. Standartyzatsiia. Sertyfikatsiia. Yakist, 2, 22–30 [in Ukrainian].

SILP. Abstract and annotation. General requirements (2001). HOST 7.9-95 (ISO 214–76) from 1d January 1997. Moscow: YPK Yzdatelstvo standartov, 9 p. [in Russian].

Information and documentation. Reports in the field of science and technology. Structure and design rules (2016). DSTU 3008:2015 from 1d October 2010. Kyiv: DP «UkrNDNTs, 31 p. [in Ukrainian].

Edition. Registration of publications in journals and collections (2010). DSTU 7152:2010 from 1d October 2010. Kyiv: Derzhspozhyvstandart, 18 p. [in Ukrainian].

SILP. Abstract and annotation. General requirements (2009). DSTU HOST 7.9:2009 (ISO 214–76) from 1d December 2009. Kyiv: Derzhspozhyvstandart, 8 p. [in Russian].

Marholiuk, V. (1993). Remarks on the development of state standards in scientific and technical terminology. Kyiv, 32 p. [in Ukrainian].

Nikolaiev, Ye. (2016). How to create a modern system of training doctors of philosophy in Ukraine (Ph.D.). Kyiv, 48 p. [in Ukrainian].

Regarding the statement of Requirements to registration of the dissertation : order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine on January 12, 2017, No. 40. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0155-17#Text [in Ukrainian].

Regarding the statement of the Order of formation of the List of scientific professional editions of Ukraine : order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine on October 17, 2012, No. 1111. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1850-12#Text [in Ukrainian].

Regarding the statement of the Order of formation of the List of scientific professional editions of Ukraine : order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine on January 15, 2018, No. 1111. Retrieved

from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0148-18#Text [in Ukrainian].

Regarding the abolition of national standards developed on the basis of interstate standards developed before 1992 : order of the SE «UkrNDNC» on December 14, 2015, No. 182 Retrieved from: http://

search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/FN016584.html [in Ukrainian].

Pshenychna, L., Shevchenko, V. & Shyshkina, N. (2008). Terminology work: scientific text as a source of new knowledge. Visnyk Nats. un-tu «Lvivska politekhnika». Seriia «Problemy ukrainskoi terminolohii», 620, 6–13 [in Ukrainian].

Kharchenko, S. V. & Lytvynska, S. V. (2013). The problematic aspects of the national standards functioning of the series «Information and Documentation». Library Science. Record Studies. Informology, 1, 8–16 [in Ukrainian].

Khoinatskyi, M. (1996). Standardization in Ukraine and directions for improving the development of state standards for information, library and publishing. Visn. Kn. Palaty, 1/2, 17–19 [in Ukrainian].

Cargill M. & O’Connor P. (2009). Writing Scientific Research Articlecles: Strategy and Steps. New Jersey: Willey Blackwell, 173 р. [in England].

Weissberg R. & Buker S. (1990). Writing Up Research: Experimental Research Report Writing for Students of English. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 207 р. [in England]

Published

2020-12-15

Issue

Section

Статті