Estimated-predictive modeling of geodemographical system, case study of Kharkiv region

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2017-46-19

Keywords:

населення, геодемографічна система, моделювання, оціночно-прогностична модель, Харківська область

Abstract

Formulation of the problem. Forecasting and modeling of certain areas of public life do not lose their relevance in underlying programs and regional development plans. Responding to the social demand, human geography expands research tool as an interdisciplinary science providing combination of research results of spatial analysis and forecast with measures of the societal management monitoring. The human-geographical concept of the region s geodemographic system provides its modeling development. There are various methods and techniques of forecasting and modeling a number, composition and movement of the population. We believe that their addition by the estimated-predictive model of the geodemographic system significantly expands opportunities for the scientifically based results.
The purpose of the article is to assess major trends of regional geodemographic system of Kharkiv region and highlights the results of estimated-predictive modeling.
Methods. In order to show the changes in the geodemographical system balance equation is used. This method describes each settlement or local geodemographical system consisting of regional geodemographical system. The general algorithm of estimated-predictive model of social position and geographical concepts of geodemographical development of the region is displayed.
Results. According to the simulation results for each year of the forecast period (20 years) population distribution by age group, the average population age, the number of migrants for each age group, the entropy information for each object and for each age group were calculated. Three scenario variants of the geodemographical regional system development were reproduced in the model. The first one preserves current vital parameters (beginning 2016), optimistic (with rising birth rates and migration activity) and average (with increased birth). For each option a situation when migrants are hosted by the cities of regional subordination including the regional center was described: 1 (Kharkiv), 2 (Kharkiv and Kupiansk), 3 (Kharkiv, Kupiansk, Izum) and 4 (Kharkiv, Kupiansk, Izum, Lozovaja).
Scientific novelty and practical significance. Estimated-predictive model of the regional geodemographical system is a versatile tool for research and social management and can be used for solving a variety of problems - from assessment and prognosis of the most common trends of regional geodemographical system to a specific demographic of detailed studies of local communities and settlements. Possibilities to apply the estimated-predictive model for regional geodemographical development are designated.

Author Biography

К. Ю. Сегіда, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

PhD (Geography),
Assistant Professor, Doctoral Student

References

Nyemets', K., Sehida K., Nyemets', L. (2016). Bahatovymirnyy analiz u suspil'niy heohrafiyi (netradytsiyni metody) [Multivariate analysis in social geography (alternative methods)]. Kh. : KhNU imeni V. N. Karazina, 120.

Nyemets', K. A., Nyemets', L. M. (2013). Prostorovyy analiz u suspil'niy heohrafiyi: novi pidkhody, metody, modeli [Spatial analysis in human geography: new approaches, methods, models]. Kharkiv, Kharkivs'kyy natsional'nyy universytet imeni V. N. Karazina, 228.

Sehida, K. (2017). Heodemohrafichna systema yak funktsional'na pidsystema sotsioheosystemy [Geodemographical system as functional subsystems of sociogeosystem]: 2017 internet conference. Trends and prospects of development of science and education in terms of globalization. Pereyaslav-Khmelnytsky (Ukraine), 394, 6-10.

Strategy of the Kharkiv region till 2020. Available at : kharkivoda.gov.ua/documents/16203/1088.pdf.

Chmykhalo, M. L. Ed (2003). Kharkivs'ka oblast' u 2002 rotsi [Kharkiv region in 2002]. Kharkov, VD «INZhEK», 604.

Chmykhalo, M. L. Ed (2004). Kharkivs'ka oblast' u 2003 rotsi [Kharkiv region in 2003]. Kharkov, PP «KrymArt», 643.

Chmykhalo, M. L. Ed (2005). Kharkivs'ka oblast' u 2004 rotsi [Kharkiv region in 2004]. Kharkov, TOV «Zoloti storinky», 608.

Chmykhalo, M. L. Ed (2006). Kharkivs'ka oblast' u 2005 rotsi [Kharkiv region in 2005]. Kharkov: TOV «Zoloti storinky», 606.

Chmykhalo, M. L. Ed (2007). Kharkivs'ka oblast' u 2006 rotsi [Kharkiv region in 2006]. Kharkov, TOV «Zoloti storinky», 562.

Chmykhalo, M. L. Ed (2008). Kharkivs'ka oblast' u 2007 rotsi [Kharkiv region in 2007]. Kharkov, Holovne upravlinnya statystyky u Kharkivs'kiy oblasti, 590.

Chmykhalo, M. L. Ed (2009). Kharkivs'ka oblast' u 2008 rotsi [Kharkiv region in 2008]. Kharkov, Holovne upravlinnya statystyky u Kharkivs'kiy oblasti, 578.

Nikiforova, O. S. Ed (2010). Kharkivs'ka oblast' u 2009 rotsi [Kharkiv region in 2009]. Kharkov, Holovne upravlinnya statystyky u Kharkivs'kiy oblasti, 586.

Mamontova, O. H. Ed (2011). Kharkivs'ka oblast' u 2010 rotsi [Kharkiv region in 2010]. Kharkov, Holovne upravlinnya statystyky u Kharkivs'kiy oblasti, 568.

Mamontova, O. H. Ed (2012). Kharkivs'ka oblast' u 2011 rotsi [Kharkiv region in 2011]. Kharkov, Holovne upravlinnya statystyky u Kharkivs'kiy oblasti, 583.

Mamontova, O. H. Ed (2013). Kharkivs'ka oblast' u 2012 rotsi [Kharkiv region in 2012]. Kharkov, Holovne upravlinnya statystyky u Kharkivs'kiy oblasti, 535.

Mamontova, O. H. Ed (2014). Kharkivs'ka oblast' u 2013 rotsi [Kharkiv region in 2013]. Kharkov, Holovne upravlinnya statystyky u Kharkivs'kiy oblasti, 492.

Mamontova, O. H. Ed (2015). Kharkivs'ka oblast' u 2014 rotsi [Kharkiv region in 2014]. Kharkov, Holovne upravlinnya statystyky u Kharkivs'kiy oblasti, 540.

Mamontova, O. H. Ed (2016). Kharkivs'ka oblast' u 2015 rotsi [Kharkiv region in 2015]. Kharkov, Holovne upravlinnya statystyky u Kharkivs'kiy oblasti, 534.

Published

2017-10-26

Issue

Section

Geography