Environmental-economic efficiency of land use improvement reasoning

Authors

  • В. М. Опара V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ukraine
  • І. М. Бузіна V. V. Dokuchayev Kharkiv National Agrarian University, Ukraine
  • С. О. Винограденко V. V. Dokuchayev Kharkiv National Agrarian University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2017-46-21

Keywords:

ecological and economic efficiency, consortium, an edifikator, a subedifikator, extensive agriculture, intensification of the using, complementary cooperation, environmental balance, ecological agriculture

Abstract

Formulation of the problem. In the conditions of fast development of the industry, energetics and transport communications, intensive mining of minerals, active chemicalixation of agriculture there is a fast increase in the level of environmental pollution and first of all soils, that in turn leads to worsening in their qualitative state.
The soil is an important unit of ecosystems, the destruction of which has multidimensional value for the stability of the environment. Agrarian transformation of soils traditionally was assessed as progressive. However, scientific analysis shows that extensive agriculture, irrational chemical fertilizer and excessive adding of pesticides led to a significant reduction in fertility, and sometimes loss due to erosion, natural soil cover on large areas.
The purpose of the article. The study of intensification of land resources in compliance with environmental principles, which should provide a comprehensive, systematic approach to solving economic, social, environmental and other problems.
Methods. The author s own achievements as well as the research results of domestic and foreign investigators made the methodical basis for the article.
Results. Ecological agriculture nowadays scientists consider a perspective direction, which allows the use of science-based pesticides and fertilizers without reducing the quality of made production, with compulsory advancing ecologization of processing industry.
The result of activation of economic activity in many cases is increasing influence on the environment, ecological balance, soil pollution, depletion of land resources, worsening their useful properties.
According to parameters of the regression model, the increase in all investigated factors other than labor costs with deductions, rendered positive influence on the resultant figure. In our case, most (relative to other factors) contributed to his growth increasing costs of seeds and planting materialbecause each additional spent thousand for this trend intensifying per one hundred hectares of arable land (if not the variability of other factors) predetermined increase yield of gross output of one point eighteen thousand UAH on one hundred hectares of arable land.
Parameters of the given model demonstrated that increase in all studied factors rendered positive impact on a productive indicator.
Scientific novelty and practical significance. One of the main mechanism for regulating ecologisation of land resources is the detection, evaluation and implementation of the highest possible reserves of increase efficiency of this process. This is a reduction of unproductive losses in resource use and saving mode, and the possibility of using scientific and technological progress as the main solution. Using regression models, that were built before, depending on the main indicators of ecological and economic efficiency of using of land resources on the arable land from specific costs, were identified reserves of increase in the investigated agricultural enterprises.

Author Biographies

В. М. Опара, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

PhD (Technics), Full Professor

І. М. Бузіна, V. V. Dokuchayev Kharkiv National Agrarian University

PhD (Ecology), Àssistant Ðrofessor

С. О. Винограденко, V. V. Dokuchayev Kharkiv National Agrarian University

PhD (Economy), Senior Lecturer

References

1. Lavryk, V. I. (1998). Metody matematychnoho modelyuvannya v ekolohiyi [Mathematical Modeling in Ecology], 256.

2. Land Code of Ukraine 25.10.2001. ¹ 2768-III. Aviable at: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/2768–14/page8.

3. On Land Protection: The Law of Ukraine 19.06.2003. ¹ 962–IV. Aviable at: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/962–15/page2.

4. Kuryl tsiv, R. M. (2006). Ekoloho-ekonomichnyy mekhanizm formuvannya ratsional noho vykorystannya i okhorony zemel nykh resursiv [Ecological and economic mechanism of rational use and protection of land resources]. Lviv, 20.

5. Koshkalda I. V., Ul yanchenkî, O. V. (2015). Standarty, normy i pravyla yak instrumentariy upravlinnya zemel nymy resursamy [Standards, rules and regulations as land management tools]. Smuhasta typohrafiya, 60–69.

6. Maslak, O. (2012). Derzhavne rehulyuvannya zemel nykh vidnosyn [State regulation of land relations]. Propozytsiya, 11. 32–36.

7. Ul yanchenko, Yu. O. (2013). Napryamy derzhavnoho rehulyuvannya zemel nykh vidnosyn v Ukrayini. [Areas of state regulation of land relations in Ukraine], 3, 106–109.

8. Zhybak, M. M., Chernyk, D. P. (2013). Orhanizatsiyno-ekonomichni umovy ta pryntsypy ratsional noho vykorystannya zemel nykh resursiv sil s kohospodars kykh pidpryyemstv [Organizational and economic conditions and principles of rational land use of agricultural enterprises]. Efektyvna ekonomika, 4.

9. Popova, O. L. (2009). Stalyy rozvytok ahrosfery Ukrayiny : polityka i mekhanizmy. [Sustainable development agrosphere Ukraine: policy and mechanisms], 352.

10. Harmashov, V., Krutyakova, V., Bezpalov, I. (2015). Khimichna skladova v roslynnyts kiy syrovyni mizerno mala porivnyano zi shkidlyvistyu nepryrodnykh inhrediyentiv pererobky [Chemical raw material component in plant growing is negligible compared to the harmfulness of unnatural ingredients processing], 3, 82–83.

11. Andriychuk, V. H. (2002). Ekonomika ahrarnykh pidpryyemstv. [The economy of agricultural enterprises]. KNEU, 624.

12. Mazur, F. F. (2005). Sotsial no-ekonomichni umovy rozvytku rekreatsiynoyi industriyi. [Socio-economic conditions of the recreation industry]. TSNL, 96.

13. Borodina, O. S. (2015). Pryntsyp komplementarnosti v mizhdystsyplinarnykh doslidzhennyakh ekonomiky. [The principle of complementarity in interdisciplinary studies of economy], 47–58.

14. Ul yanchenko, O. V. (2008). Upravlinnya resursnym potentsialom v ahrarnomu sektori. [Managing resource potential in the agricultural sector], 38.

15. Okhrimenko, I. V. (2009). Vytraty ta sobivartist sil s kohospodars koyi produktsiyi v rehulyuvanni ekonomichnykh vidnosyn sil s kohospodars kykh pidpryyemstv. [The costs and the cost of agricultural production in the regulation of economic relations farm]. Lohos, 388.

16. Kozakova, I. V. (2014). Efektyvnist resursooshchadnykh tekhnolohiy vyrobnytstva zerna u sil s kohospodars kykh pidpryyemstvakh. [The efficiency of resource saving technologies of grain production in agricultural enterprises], 20.

17. Henyk, Ya. V. (2009). Ekoloho-biolohichni osnovy vidnovlennya landshaftiv, porushenykh zvalyshchamy ta polihonamy tverdykh pobutovykh vidkhodiv. [Ecological and biological basis of restoration of landscapes disturbed dumps and landfills]. Ekolohiya dovkillya, 19, 2.

18. Kravets , O. P. (2002). Suchasnyy stan ta problemy fitoochyshchennya gruntiv vid radionuklidiv i vazhkykh metaliv. [Current status and problems of recultivation soils from radionuclides and heavy metals], 34(5), 377–386.

19. Hyrlya, L. M. (2011). Fitoremediatsiya – efektyvnyy shlyakh znyzhennya vmistu vazhkykh metaliv u gruntakh. [Phytoremediation - an effective way to reduce the content of heavy metals in soils]. T. 152, 57–59.

20. Bilets ka, V. A., Yatsechko, N. Ye., Pavlychenko, A. V. (2013). Doslidzhennya protsesiv transformatsiyi vodorozchynnykh form vazhkykh metaliv pry detoksykatsiyi promyslovykh vidkhodiv pryrodnymy sorbentamy. [Investigation of the transformation of soluble forms of heavy metals in industrial waste detoxification natural sorbents]: Aviable at: http://rr.nmu.org.ua/pdf/2013/20131016-52.pdf.

Published

2017-10-31

Issue

Section

Ecology