Solving the problem of search for a suitable city area using spatial analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2017-47-22

Keywords:

spatial analysis, search for a suitable area, urban research, anthropogenic infrastructure, GIS, ArcGIS, modeling phenomena and processes, the infrastructure of Kharkiv

Abstract

Formulation of the problem. The article focuses on the algorithm for solving a typical problem to find a suitable area within the city area for a new facility (individual components of the infrastructure). The main tool for achieving the goal is the concept of spatial analysis, which includes modeling of phenomena and processes. It is known that there are some reasons why modern research does not always correspond to the needs of society. This is, first of all, difficulties in collecting primary data. The researchers couldn’t use standard sources of primary data, such as statistical collections, since cities do not have a single register of such information. Accordingly, they have to look for alternatives. One of these may be electronic reference books, such as 2GIS. If researchers find ways to properly collect valuable information about the infrastructural features of cities, they will be able to make their work more useful and practical for the society.

The purpose of the article. Consideration of one of the options for solving a typical problem of finding an optimal location for a new object based on a set of factors in the GIS environment (for example, finding a suitable site for building a new school near parks, playgrounds and at a distance from other schools, ceme-teries).

Methods. Some parts of the ArcGIS platform and the ArcToolBox toolbar functionality have been used to perform spatial analysis (the Spatial Analyst module in particular). These are Euclidean distance, Reclassifying, Raster calculator and other tools of the Spatial Analyst module.

Results. The algorithm for solving a spatial analytic problem, consisting of five steps (setting the problem, dividing it into separate components, studying the initial data, performing the analysis and verifying the results) has been considered. Special attention is paid to the layout and combination of operations, performed to complicate the logic of the research. The raster calculator provides the ability to compare numerical absolute and relative indicators with indication of weights and specific algebra of maps. As a result, we find an optimal location for a new school within the city of Kharkiv. The remoteness of other schools, cemeteries, the proximity of park areas and playgrounds were taken as weighty factors. For each of the criteria, models of Euclidean distances were constructed in order to rank the territory for 10 categories of proximity/remoteness of objects. This is a practical example of using reclassification to combine the objects proximity/remoteness.

Scientific novelty and practical significance. It was has been found out that scientists can do their research more practical, using modern geoprocessing tools and electronic reference books. There has been a typical algorithm for solving the spatial analytic problem, which is relevant for large cities. The instruments themselves are not new, but the conceptual algorithm which uses specific primary information about the infrastructure of the settlement and the functionality of the ArcGIS, has not been previously described.

Author Biography

О. С. Чуєв, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

PhD student

References

Bitjukova, V. R. (2004). Social’no-jecologicheskie problemy razvitija gorodov Rossii [Socio-ecological problems of urban development in Russia]. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 448.

Zejler, M. (2004) Modelyrovanye Nasheho Myra. Posobye ESRI po proektyrovanyyu baz heodannikh [Modeling Our World. ESRI's Guide to the Design of Geodatabases]. Kyiv: ECOMM, 254.

Kostrikov, S. V. (2014). Heoinfomatsiyne modelyuvannya pryrodno-antropohennoho dovkillya. Naukova monohrafiya [Geoinformation modeling of natural and man-made environment. Scientific monograph]. Kharkiv: Vud-vo HNU, 484.

Kostrikov, S. V., Chuev O. S. (2015). Dvorivneva GIS-model’ dlya analizu urboheosystem [Two-level GIS model for analysis of urboheosystems]. Region – 2015: Strategy of optimal development. Annual International Conference. Kharkiv, 20-22.

Kostrikov, S. V. (2014). Prohramne zabezpechennya GIS dlya LiDAR-technolohiyi dystantsiynoho zonduvannya v tsilyakh analizu urboheosystem [GIS software for LiDAR-technology for remote sensing for the purpose of analysis of urboheosystems]. Problemy bezperervnoyi heohraphichnoyi osvity i kartohraphiyi. 19, 45-52.

Lihacheva, Je. A. etc. (1996). Gorod – ekosystema [City-Ecosystem]. Moscow: IGRAN, 336.

Myezentsev, K. V. (2012). Urbanizovani terytoriyi Ukrainy: prychyny i naslidky transformatsiyi u postradyans'kyy period [Urbanized Territories of Ukraine: Causes and Consequences of Transformation in the Post-Soviet Period]. Sotsial'no-heohrafichni vyklyky u Skhidno-Tsentral'niy Yevropi na pochatku XXI stolittya, Berehove, 310-317.

Official site of the electronic directory of 2GIS. Available at: https://2gis.ua

Tikunov, V. S. (2005). Modelirovanie v sotsyal'no-jekonomicheskoj geografii [Modeling in socio-economic geography. Tutorial]. Uchebnoe posobie. Moscow: Izd-vo MHU, 280.

Chuyev, O. S. (2017). Vykorystannya elektronnoho dovidnyka 2GIS ta GIS-platformy ArcGIS dlya doslidzhennya infrastruktury mista [Using the electronic directory of ArcGIS 2GIS and the GIS platform to explore the city's infrastructure]. Vistnyk Khersons'koho derzhavnoho universyteu, seriya «Geohrafichni nauky». Kherson: Vydavnytstvo KhDU, 7, 52-62.

Chuyev, O. S., Kostrikov, S. V. (2015). Otsinka cherez GIS-zasobu prostorovoi differentisatsii blagoustroyu mista yak funktsii urbogeosystemu (na prykladi mista Kharkiv) [GIS estimation of spatial differentiation of the city's improvement as a function of the urban geosystem (for example, the city of Kharkiv)]. Chasopys social’noekonomichnoyi heohraphiyi. Kharkiv, 18 (1), 52-62.

Bailey, T., Fotheringham, S. (1994). A Review of Statistical Spatial Analysis in Geographical Information Systems. Spatial Analysis and GIS. London: Taylor & Francis, 13-44.

Berkowitz, A. R., Nilon, C. H., Hollweg, K. S. edc. (2005). Understanding Urban Ecosystems: A New Frontier for Science and Education. New York: Springer-Verlag, 523.

Bourne, L. S. (1997). Polarities of Structure and Change in Urban Systems: A Canadian Example. 43, 339 -349.

Bourne, L. S., Simmons, J. W. (Editors). (1978). Systems of Cities: Readings on Structure, Growth, and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 565.

Boyce, D., Williams, H. (2015). Forecasting Urban Travel: Past, Present and Future Cheltenham – Northhampton: EE Publishing, 639.

Coffey, W. J. Shearmur, R. G. (1998). Factors and Correlates of Employment Growth in the Canadian Urban System, 1971-1991. Growth and Change. 29, 44-66.

Goodchild, M. F., Yuan, M., Cova, T. J. (2007). Towards a general theory of geographic representation in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 21 (3), 239–260.

Kostrikov, S., Sehida, K. (2013). Human geography with geographical information systems. Human Geography journal. 15 (2), 39-47.

Maquire, D. GIS, Batty M., Goodchild M. (2005). Spatial Analysis and Modeling. Redlands: ESRI Press, 478.

Perencsik, A., Woo, S., Booth, B. (2014). ArcGIS: Building a Geodatabase. Redlands: ESRI Press, 355.

Simmons, J. W. (1978). The organization of the urban system. In: Bourne L.S., Simmons J.W. edc. Systems of Cities: Readings on Structure, Growth, and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 61-69.

Wong, C., Baker, M., Webb, B., Hincks., S, Schulze-Baing., A. (2015). Mapping policies and programmes: The use of GIS to communicate spatial relationships in England. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design. 42 (6), 1020-1039.

Published

2018-02-24

Issue

Section

Geography