Indicative landscape monitoring of the national nature park (case study the territory of Slobozhansky National Nature Park)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2018-49-15Keywords:
indicative landscape monitoring, plant communities, wetlands, PlaneScope, Sentinel-2, Semi-automatic classification, overlay analysis, NextGisAbstract
Formulation of the problem. National Natural Parks (NNP) – protected areas where anthropogenic and natural landscapes are combined in the same territory. In addition, the main functions of such objects are significantly competitive, which requires monitoring of changes in existing landscapes. It is necessary to define the local objects which, being the most sensitive, at the same time have small plasticity, therefore, are capable to react quickly and adequately to any changes. That is what we call indicative.
Analysis of recent research and publications. Many researchers of the USA, Great Britain, Germany, Australia conduct landscape monitoring using remote sensing data and GIS technologies. For example, D. Keith, S. Rodoreda, L. Holman, R. Noss, U. Walz, and others. The National Inventory of Landscapes in Sweden studies development of modern landscape monitoring in countries of Europe. Landscape Monitoring of Terrestrial Ecosystems, studied by researches R. Kennedy, J. Jons, K. Jones and others allow using data of satellite for selection of plant contours using Gis-technology. Landscape monitoring of the territory of NNP «Slobozhanskiy» has never been carried out.
The aim of the study is to choose satellite images, taking into account the area of the study, the choice of optimal methods of their processing for the compilation of a database of landscape structure facies for landscape monitoring based on long-term observations on the ground, comparing their results with geodata. We have determined wetlands, as landscape indicators.
Presentation of the main material of the study. Comprehensive analysis of remote sensing data carried out by the authors, allowed us to make sure that vegetation cover is the most indicative, except for the contours of wetlands, which are clearly identified and easily compared in multi-spectral images. It is reliably determined by the characteristic features combine with the corresponding spectral ranges and the image structure. In addition, changes in vegetation allows you to visually determine changes in landscape groupings and the speed of these changes.
Summary. The indicative features of landscape monitoring are wetlands, and there are two direct indicators: the contours of wetlands and the change in the aspect of vegetation. The monitoring method is a multispectral analysis of images obtained by processing combinations of spectral channels, which showed the ability to determine the changes in the selection, taking into account reflectivity of the surface. Limitations of the method are the following: there is no established method of meticulous analysis of changes in the structure of vegetation, which is observed visually, but is not reflected instrumentally; inability to take into account random features of the territory conditions and space scanning at a certain point, which is interesting for the study. Finally, the types of monitoring objects, indicative signs of changes and ways to track them according to high-precision and generally available satellite information are determined.References
Bayrak G. R., Muha B. P. (2010). Remote research of the Earth: textbook. Lviv, publishing center of Ivan Franko LNU, 712.
Bogdanov A. P., Aleshko G. A. (2016). Development of methods for monitoring the state of forests on the basis of the use of data of multispectral space. Arkhangelsk, FBU "Northern research Institute of forestry", 98-110.
Bodnia O. V., Ovcharenko A. Yu., Chervanev I. G. (2017). Geoecological analysis of short-term trends changes in the structure of the territory of NPP "Slobozhanskiy" based on satellite imagery Planetscope. Kharkiv, KNU of V. N. Karazin, 47, 176-181.
Bodnia O. V., Ovcharenko A. Yu., Sennaya O. I. [and other]. (2016). Landscape mapping of NPP "Slobozhansky" by means of mobile, desktop and web applications of ArcGis. Kharkiv, 15-21.
Bodnia O. V., Oleynikov I. A., Ovcharenko A. Yu. (2017). Landscape of online mapping using smartphones, equipped with GIS technology: application experience in Slobozhansky national Park. Lviv, Publishing center of LNU of Ivana Franco, 32-33.
Vidina A. A. (1981). Practical classes in landscape decryption arafathospital. M., MNU, 58.
Zagulskaya O. (2004). Landscape-remote research: advantages, achievements, perspectives. Lviv, 31., 277-284.
Israel Yu. A. (1979). Ecology and control of natural environment. L., Hydrometeoizdat, 375.
Ilyina O. V. (2003). Anthropogenic transformations of marsh complexes. Lutsk, Volyn state University, 111-114.
Ilyina O. V. (2007). Ecological and geographical analysis of bogs of Volyn region. Lutsk, Volyn national University of Lesya Ukrainka, 14-17.
Karaim O. A. (2013). Monitoring the system landscape governance of protected areas. Lutsk, Volyn national University of Lesya Ukrainka, 3., 91-98.
Miller G. P. (1996). Field landscape removal of mountain areas. K., IZMN, 168.
Ovcharenko A. Yu., Zalubovska O. V. (2018). Opportunities of automated information processing for the needs of monitoring and protection of landscapes using satellite images, for example, the territory of NPP "Slobozhanskiy" . Lviv, LNU of Ivan Franko, 266-271.
Ovcharenko A. Yu. (2018). Automated information processing capabilities with the help of ArcGis for implementa-tion of the landscape monitoring of the territory under study. Collection of Materials of the conference "GIS-forum-2018". Kharkiv, KNU of V. N. Karazin., 2, 62-67.
Perepechina Yu. I., Glushenkov O. I., Korsikov R. S. (2017). Determination of forest cover and quantitative characteristics of forests from Sentinel-2 satellite images (on the example of Shebekinsky municipal district of Belgorod region). 4, 85-93.
Romanchu, I. F., Sakhatsky O. I., Apostolov O. A. (2018). Soil moisture assessment using satellite images of Sentinel-2 (by the example of the baryshevsky test site of the Kiev region): report of the national Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. K., GU "Scientific Centre for aerospace research of the Earth of Institute of geological Sciences of NAS of Ukraine". 1, 60-66.
Slobodyanik M. P. (2014). The use of remote sensing methods and GIS technologies for monitoring forest re-sources. 1 (88), 27-31.
Coppin P., Jonckheere I., Nackaerts K. [and others]. (2004). Digital change detection methods in ecosystem moni-toring: a review. Belgium, 25, 9, 1565–1596.
Cushman S., McGarigal K., Neel M. (2007). Parsimony in landscape metrics: Strength, universality, and consisten-cy. 8, 691-703.
Houet T., Verburg P., Loveland T. (2010). Monitoring and modelling landscape dynamics. 25, 163-167.
Jons J. (2001). Monitoring species abundance and distribution at the landscape. 48, 9-13.
Keith D., Rodoreda S., Holman L. [andother]. (2006). Monitoring of changes in upland swamps in Sydney’s water catchments: the roles of fire and rain. Sydney, 1055-1059.
Kennedy R., Townsend P., Gross J. [and others]. (2009). Remote sensing change detection tools for natural re-source managers: Understanding concepts and tradeoffs in the design of landscape monitoring projects. 1382–1396
National Inventory of Landscapes in Sweden (NILS)–scope, design, and experiences from establishing a multiscale biodiversity monitoring system. (2011). 173., 579-595.
Noss R. Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach. (1990). Corvalli, Environmental Re-search Laboratory, 4, 355-364.
O'Neill R., Hunsaker C., Jones K. [and other]. (1997). Monitoring Environmental Quality at the Landscape Scale [and other]. 513-519.
Ricardo D. Lopez. Frohn C. (2017). Remote Sensing for Landscape Ecology: New Metric Indicators. Monitoring, Modeling, and Assessment of Ecosystems. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 285.
Roy Y. Paudel K. (2013). Landscape Monitoring of Terrestrial Ecosystems in the Credit River Watershed. Mead-owvale, 53.
Tretyakov O. S. Bodnia O. V., Balynska M. O. [andother]. (2015). Features of interpretation of plant association in national natural park “Slobozhanskiy”, using Landsat 8 satellite data. Kharkiv, KNU of V. N. Karazin, 21, 73-79.
Walz U. (2008). Monitoring of landscape changes and functions in Saxony (Eastern Germany) – Methods and indicators. 8, 807-817.
Zerger A., Gibbons P. Jones S. [and other]. (2006). Spatial modelling of native vegetation condition. 537–544.
Konstatninovskaya L. V. Interpretation of space imagery materials. Available at: http://www.astronom2000.info
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Аліна Юріївна Овчаренко, Оксана Вікторівна Залюбовська
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
