Application of geoecological vulnerability assessment to prevention of emergencies

Authors

  • I. G. Chervanyov V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ukraine
  • Ye. O. Varyvoda National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2015-42-26

Keywords:

emergency situations, geosystem, geoecological vulnerability, assessment, environment

Abstract

The articles analyses prerequisites of development and introduction of modern approach to a problem of the ensuring preventive safety based on methodology of geoecological vulnerability assessment to emergency situations in Ukraine.

It is examined that experience of realization of vulnerability assessment to emergency situations in Ukraine is limited to researches in the field of the social and economic analysis of emergency situations of natural and technogenic character for today. It is necessary to provide active actions in the field of harmonization and the subsequent implementation of the normative legal acts, methodological approaches and separate standards aimed at the development and strengthening of potential of counteraction in emergency situations at the expense of geoecological vulnerability assessment application.

Comparative analysis of an “emergency situation” and “geosystem” characteristics in terms of vulnerability conception allowing to conclude that adaptation of the conception in Ukraine can effectively be solved by the use of research tools of constructive geography and geoecology. Constructive and geographical approach is a backbone to integration of information, analytical and decision-making processes on a uniform methodological basis. The elaboration of the methodology of estimation of geoecological vulnerability to emergency situations can serve as a powerful impulse for development. The analysis and generalization of various techniques and approaches to an assessment of vulnerability show expediency of development of the generalized integrated methodology. Obligatory elements of an assessment of geoecological vulnerability are: landscape maps as a basis for spatial localization; a set of estimated criteria and indicators in total the landscapes defining degree of vulnerability to emergency situations; analysis of the structurally functional organization of landscape complexes; estimation and classification of landscape complexes by vulnerability degree to emergency situations; development of geoecological recommendations on strengthening of coping capacity  to vulnerability.

It is concluded in the article that introduction of geoecological vulnerability assessment methodology will provide transition to a qualitatively new level of management of emergency situations prevention, mitigation of risks and consequences for the account of transition from the model based on collecting, documenting and synthesis of data on emergency situations to the analysis of geoecological prerequisites of their emergence, identification of natural mechanisms of self-control and development of preventive measures.

Author Biographies

I. G. Chervanyov, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Doctor of Sciences (Technics), Full Professor

Ye. O. Varyvoda, National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

PhD (Geography), Associate Professor

References

Adger, W. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268-281.

Alexander, D., Birkmann, J. and Kienberger, S. (n.d.). (2014). Assessment of vulnerability to natural hazards.

Bankoff, G., Frerks, G. and Hilhorst, D. (2004). Mapping Vulnerability. London: Earthscan.

Bagrov, N., Rudenko, L., and Chervanyov, I. (2012). The “new” Geography of the Information age: the Ukrainian realizes and trends. Geography, Ecology and Environment, RAN, Moscow.

Birkmann, J. (2013). Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

Bokov, V. (2005). Jekogeodinamika Krymskogo regiona: konceptual'nye podhody. Geopolitika i jekogeodinamika regionov, (5), 7-11.

Cardona, O. (2004). The need for rethinking the concepts of vulnerability and risk from a holistic perspective: a necessary review and criticism for effective risk management. In: Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development and People, London: Earthscan, 37-51.

Cardona, O. (2011). Disaster risk and vulnerability: Notions and measurement of human and environmental insecurity. In: Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security – Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks, Berlin: Springer, 107-122.

Chervanev, I. (2000). Perspektiva ocenki vozdejstvija na okruzhajushhuju sredu s uchetom spontannyh processov samoorganizacii (v regional'nom aspekte stran ChJeS). Chrezvychajnye situacii: preduprezhdenie i likvidacija posledstvi, Har'kov, 159-160.

Green, C. (2004). The evaluation of vulnerability to flooding. Disaster Prevention and management, 13(4), 323-329.

Luers, L. (2005). The surface of vulnerability: an analytical framework for examining environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 15, 214-223.

Mamaev, Ju. (1996). Voprosy metodologii v ocenke ustojchivosti territorij. Geojekologija, (2), 17-18.

Mjagkov, S. (1995). Geografija prirodnogo riska. Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. Un-ta.

Puzachenko, Yu. et al. (1991). Geograficheskie osnovy preduprezhdenija i likvidacii posledstvij prirodno-tehnogennyh katastrof. Izvestija AN SSSR, (6), 40.

Schneiderbauer, S. and Ehrlich, D. (2004). Risk, hazard and people’s vulnerability to natural hazards: A review of definitions, concepts and data. European Commission-Joint Research Centre (EC-JRC). Brussels.

Unisdr.org, (2014). Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters - full text - UNISDR. [online] Available at: http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/1037 [Accessed 24 Dec. 2014].

Vogel, C. and O’Brein, K. (2004). Vulnerability and Global Environmental Change: Rhetoric and Reality. AVISO – Information Bulletin on Global Environmental Change and Human Security.

Voloshyn, S. et al. (2010). Social'no-ekonomichnyj analiz nadzvychajnyh sytuacij pryrodnogo ta tehnogennogo harakteru. Simferopol': RVPS Ukrai'ny NAN Ukrai'ny.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-04

Issue

Section

Ecology