SOCIAL AND GEOGRAPHIC ASPECTS IN THE RESEARCH OF AGRIBUSINESS TERRITORIAL ORGANIZATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2015-43-25Keywords:
agribusiness (agrarian and industrial complex), territorial organization, agribusiness integration, agrarian cluster, development, structural changesAbstract
During Soviet times, the territorial system of agribusiness (agrarian and industrial complex) consisted of large state agricultural and processing companies, agricultural associations. The main integrators and system-forming units at that time were processing plants. In modern terms integrators are not only and not so much processing enterprises as investment companies, large farms with their own processing base and integrated formation that accumulate different stages of agricultural production. Modern agriculture development is characterized by diverse forms of ownership and economic structure shapes farms also as particularly important departure from traditional sectoral management to complex territorial and functional principle of functioning and development.
The article proposes a scheme of territorial and functional structure of agriculture, the basis of which we combined as consolidated taxonomy forms of territorial organization and levels of territorial organization. By levels of territorial organization of agribusiness we identify the national level – within the state; regional – the level of the oblast, region; sub-regional – level large parts of the region (seaside of Kherson region); mezo-regional – the level of administrative units, including city councils; micro-regional – within town and village councils and local – within certain villages. In some cases, the presence information database can be continued differentiation territorial levels to a point level – based on individual businesses and business units.
The forms of territorial organization include: specialized agricultural areas (zones, districts, sub-districts, areas), agro-industrial system (APS) and agro-industrial clusters. APS is formed based on a type of agro-industrial integration, according to form following systems: agricultural (without specialization); agrarian and industrial, agrarian and financial system. In the formation of any system the main role belongs to the existing links between the main elements (subsystems). By these we mean: organizational and economic relations (organizational, managerial, marketing, agri-service) and technological ties.
A new phenomenon in the structure of AIC (primarily within regional AIC) is an agro-industrial clusters. An agricultural cluster is understood by us as a combination of different spatial orientation of the sector companies, organizations and institutions that may be involved in the agro-industrial production and located in geographical proximity to each other. Among them are: agriculture, processing enterprises, research and educational institutions, market infrastructure, etc.
References
Kanivs’kyy, P.K. ed. (2005). Ahropromyslovyy kompleks Ukrayiny: stan, tendentsiyi ta perspektyvy rozvytku. Kyiv (Ukraine): In-t ahrar. ekonomiky, 292.
Alaev, É.B. (1983). Sotsyal’no-ékonomycheskaya heohrafyya: Ponyatyyno-termynolohycheskyy slovar’. Moscow (Russia): Mysl’, 350.
Palamarchuk, M.M. Nahirna, V.P., Palamarchuk, V.M., (1980). APK URSR: Posibnyk dlya vchytelya, Kyiv (Ukraine): Radyans’ka shkola, 175.
Balabanov, H.V. (2000). Terrytoryal’naya sehmentatsyya prodovol’stvennoho rynka Ukrayny. Kyiv (Ukraine): TSPER, 187.
Balabanov, H.V., Kobzyev, O.M., Semenchenko, H.V. (2000). Transformatsiya struktury sil’s’kohospodars’koho vyrobnytstva Ukrayiny: rehional’nyy aspekt. Kyyiv(Ukraine): UAPP / PAP, 29.
Derechyn, V.V. Dovhopalova, R.D. (1991). Analyz éffektyvnosty yspol’zovanyya osnovnykh fondov v ahropromyshlennom komplekse: Metodolohycheskyy aspekt. Kyiv (Ukraine): Lybyd’, 104.
Dudnyk, I.M. (1997). Suspil’no-heohrafichni systemy nyzovoho rivnya (teoretychni ta metodolohichni aspekty). Poltava (Ukraine): Poltavs’kyy literator, 248.
Kryuchkov, V.H. (1978). Terrytoryal’naya orhanyzatsyya sel’skoho khozyaystva (Problemy y metody ékonomyko-heohrafycheskoho yssledovanyya). Moscow (Russia): Mysl’, 268.
Marmul’, L.O. Efektyvnist’ funktsionuvannya rehional’noho APK v umovakh rynkovoyi ekonomiky / AN Ukrayiny, RVPS Ukrayiny; Melitopol’s’kyy derzhavnyy pedinstytut. Kyiv(Ukraine), 1993.
Mukomel’, I.F. (1961). Sil’s’kohospodars’ki zony Ukrayins’koyi RSR: Monohrafiya. Kyiv (Ukraine): Vyd-vo Kyyivs’koho un-tu, 396.
Pistun, M.D. Hutsal, V.O., Provotar, M.D. (1997). Heohrafiya ahropromyslovykh kompleksiv: [navch. posibnyk]. Kyiv (Ukraine): Lybid’, 198.
Rakytnykov, A.N. (1970). Heohrafyya sel’skoho khozyaystva (Problemy y metody yssledovanyya). Moscow (Russia): Mysl’, 342.
Borshchevs’kyy, P.P., Ushkarenko, V.O., Chernyuk, L.H., Marmul’, L.O. (1996). Rehional’ni APK Ukrayiny (teoriya ta praktyka rozvytku). Kyiv (Ukraine): Naukova dumka, 263.
Yurchyshyn, V.V., Shevchenko, L.M., Brus, V.Kh. (2004). Rozvytok riznoukladnosti na seli: osoblyvosti, problemy. Kyiv (Ukraine): NNTS IAE, 446.
Osaulenko O.H. ed. (2006). Rozvytok sil’s’kykh terytoriy Ukrayiny: [zbirnyk]. Kyiv (Ukraine): IVTS Derzhkomstatu Ukrayiny, 751.
Sarkisov, A.Yu. (2009). Osoblyvosti rozvytku riznykh form hospodaryuvannya v APK Khersons’koyi oblasti. Chasopys sotsial’no-ekonomichnoyi heohrafiyi KHNU imeni V.N. Karazina, 6 (1), 188-193.
Sarkisov, A.Yu. (2010). Osoblyvosti ta tendentsiyi suchasnoho rozvytku APK Khersons’koyi oblasti. Culture of the people of Black Sea Coast, 177, 131-133.
Sarkisov, A.Yu. (2008). Sutnist’ ta znachennya ahropromyslovoyi intehratsiyi. Molod’ – heohrafichniy nautsi: [zb. nauk. Prats’]. Kyiv (Ukraine): Obriy, IV, 332-333.
Sarkisov, A.Yu. (2010). Teoretyko-metodolohichni pryntsypy doslidzhennya transformatsiyi terytorial’noyi orhanizatsiyi APK v suchasnykh umovakh. Culture of the people of Black Sea Coast, 191, 7-9.
Sarkisov, A.Yu. (2009). Transformatsiya zemlekorystuvannya ta zemlevolodinnya v APK Khersons’koyi oblasti. Materialy VI Mizhnarodnoyi naukovoyi konferentsiyi. Conference. Geography, geoecology, geology: the experience of science research. (28-30 kvitnya 2009). Dnipropetrovs’k (Ukraine), 377-379.
Sarkisov A.Yu. (2011). Transformatsiya terytorial’noyi orhanizatsiyi APK Khersons’koho rehionu v suchasnykh umovakh. (The transformation of territorial organization of agrarian and industrial complex of Ukraine]. Odessa National University after Illya Mechnicov. Odesa (Ukraine), 20.
Semenov, V.F., Derechyn V.V. (1995). Rehyonalnyy APK: teoryya, praktyka, problemy. Odessa (Ukraine): OKFA, 164.
Sokolenko, S.I.( 2004). Klastery v hlobal’niy ekonomitsi. Kyiv (Ukraine): Lohos, 848.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 А. Ю. Саркісов
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
