Issues and development prospects of the passenger transport in the city of Kharkiv: sociological and geographical aspect
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2016-44-19Keywords:
urban electric transport, metro system, automobile transport, tramway transport, premetro, monorailAbstract
Passenger transport is a most important part of Kharkiv transport system. Each of modern modes of transport – with their own features and infrastructure – functions as a whole system, while there is a range of problems encountered in the field.
Metro carries the largest number of passengers in Kharkiv, which is attributable to its advantages: it faces no traffic congestion; it operates equally efficiently in any time or season of the year. This mode faces such issues as relatively low trains’ speed, limited branching around the city. Motor vehicle takes the second place based on the transportations number. The major advantage is its mobility, and disadvantages include considerable impact on ecology, enlarged number of vehicles and enlarged congestion on city roads. Trolleybus transport is the least hazardous for the environment. The disadvantages include limited mobility, exhausted rolling stock, catenary system, and road surface. Trams occupy the last place by the number of passengers carried in Kharkiv. It has the following advantages: eco-friendly, costs cheaper in use, its technical lifespan is longer. It faces the following issues: tram lines are expensive in laying and service, need rational ways of laying, rolling stock is scarcely repaired or replaced.
Having studied the public transport main modes in Kharkiv, we provide recommendations to this system optimization. Premetro is proposed as an alternative to the tram. It is separated from the traffic flow and allows for saving on the rolling stock. Among disadvantages, there is less capacity as compared to the metro, and higher construction costs compared to the tram. It is reasonable to introduce premetro on the perspective areas of metro building. We find single rail transport to be promising. It does not overload automobile roads, and congestion has no effect on it, it gathers great speed and produces little noise, its construction takes less time, it is five to ten times cheaper in building compared to the metro, and two to three times cheaper than city automobile overpasses. It has its disadvantages as well. There are higher servicing costs,passengers get locked in a train if an unplanned stop takes place. Single rail transport is perspective to unite end metro stations.
References
1. Bezlyubchenko, O. S., Hordiyenko S. M., Zaval’nyi (2006). Planuvannya mist i transport [Cities planning and transport]. Kharkiv, Ukraine: HNUMG, 138.
2. Hrabel'nykov, V.A. (2012). Systema miskoho pasazhyrskoho transportu yak obyekt upravlinnya [City public transport system as subject to management]. Scholarly works: research and methodology journal, Government Control, 194 (182), 118-122.
3. Hunko, I. V., Hutsalenko O. V. (2015). Transport - aktualni problemy ta s'ohodennya [Transport – current issues and reality]. Technics, energy, agroindustrial complex, 2, 98-104.
4. Kaylyuk, Ye. M, Kryshtopets', I. M. Problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku mis'koho pasazhyrs'koho transportu na prykladi m. Kharkova [Issues and perspectives of the city passenger transport in Kharkiv]. Available at: http://eprints.kname.edu.ua/32553/1/88.pdf
5. Lezhneva, O. I. (2013). Rezultaty doslidzhennya zabrudnennya atmosfernoho povitrya avtomobil'nym transportom na vulytsyakh m. Kharkova [Results of atmospheric air pollution caused by automobile transport in Kharkiv city]. Motor transport, 33, 110-114.
6. Moroz, M. M. (2015). Shlyakhy vdoskonalennya pasazhyrs'kykh perevezen' transportom zahal'noho korystuvannya [Ways to improve passenger transportation by common transport]. Collection of research papers of Kirovograd national technical university. Technics in agricultural production, industrial engineering, and automatization, 28, 57-63.
7. Moroz, O. V. (2011). Modelyuvannya vyznachennya obsyahu popytu mis'kym pasazhyrs'kym transportom [Modelling the demand volume measurements on city public transport]. Project managing, system analysis and logistics, technical issue, 8, 340-343.
8. Novikova, A. M. (2010). Hromads'kyy transport Avstriyi: dosvid ta uroky dlya Ukrayiny [Austria public transport: experience and tutorials for Ukraine].Ukrainian motor road book, 6, 4-9.
9. Novomyrs'ka, I. B. (2011). Osnovni metody ta modeli prohnozuvannya obsyahiv pasazhyrs'kykh perevezen' transportom zahal'noho korystuvannya [Principal methods and models to predict public common transportation scope]. National Transport University newsletter, 24 (2), 198-202.
10. Ozerova, O. O. (2013). Prohnozuvannya pasazhyrs'kykh potokiv u velykykh transportnykh vuzlakh [Predicting passenger flow in big transport hubs]. Transport science and progress. Newsletter of Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan, 6, 72-80.
11. Otechko, S. A. (2011). Vehicle transport effect on Kharkiv ecology. Proceding of 4th Ukrainian scientific conference with international scientists. Sumy (Ukraine). P. 385-388.
12. Kharkiv general plan. Available at : http://uga.kharkov.ua/v-transport/
13. Electronic encyclopedia. Available at : http://uk.wikipedia.org/
14. Kharkiv of transport. Available at : http://gortransport.kharkov.ua/
15. Pankratov, D. P., Faletska, H. I. (2015). Vybir pasazhyramy shlyakhu peresuvannya u mistakh [How passengers choose transportation ways in cities]. O.M.Beketov National University of Urban Economy. Kharkiv, 164.
16. Transport complex of Kharkiv region in 2012 (2013). Collected statistics. Main statistics office in Kharkiv region. Kharkiv, 96.
17. Fedorov, V. A. (2014). Horodskoy passazhyrskyy transport Sankt-Peterburha: polytyka, stratehyya, ekonomyka (1991-2014 hh.) [City passenger transport of Saint Petersburg city: politics, strategy, economics (1991-2014)]. Saint Petersburg: Print, 232.
18. Chuvayev, P. I. (2013). Problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku avtomobil'noho transportu Ukrayiny [Problems and development prospectives of motor transport in Ukraine]. SevNTU newsletter. Machines and instruments construction and transport, 143, 196-198.
19. Shinkarenko, D. A. (2013). Transport yak skladova transportno-komunikatsiynoyi systemy velykoho mista [Transport as a part of transport and communication system of a city]. Newsletter of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Geology – Geography – Ecology, 1049 (38), 177-182.
20. Maslak, О. І., Moroz, О. V., Moroz, М. М. (2014). Specific features of city public transport financing (Kremenchuk case study). Economics contemporary issues, 10, 239-246.
21. Sotnichenko, L. (2013). Intelligent transport systems - quality factor of the development of the transport system. Economics innovations, 56, 136-143.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 C. A. Отечко
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
