Methodological basis of economic geography (part 1)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2016-44-22Keywords:
economic geography, social, socio-economic, social geography, relationships and influencesAbstract
By the middle of the 60-s years of the XX century, a theory of economic geography occupied a leading position in geographical science and was recognized by the world community of geographers. Scientists were assured that science would be perspective for the future. At that time, the original methods of research were developed, economic and geographical division into districts of the country were carried out, which was used in government plans for future economic development.
However, in the 70-s years of the XX century, the situation has changed and economic geography suffered sharp and informed criticism for scholastic nature of theoretical analysis, narrow regional studies, developed pseudo efficiency, a sharp falling behind the world level. The crisis in economic science began spreading rapidly. In the 20 years of the last century, some scientists had even begun to refer the economic geography to economics.
The crisis had matured a long time from the terrible extermination of the geographical elite in the 30-s-50-s years of the XX century, and in the 60-s after the period of the «Khrushchоv thaw» in the science, occasional people who generated dressing, protectionism, sectionalism, corruption that led to deep crisis of the economic geography «rushed» into it.
Economic geography has formed an uncertainty situation of its status: today, some geographers affirm that economic geography no longer execute its function as an independent science and has became an addition to other sciences. After a long and emotional discussion «the fate» of economic geography was determined – it had become part of other sciences, «social geography» and «social and economic geography». However, new sciences cannot do without economic geography. Therefore, there was a problem to ascertain the current status of economic geography in the system of geographical sciences. In fact, it is a self-sufficient science. To prove this statement, we have determined the ways for further research.
References
1. Agranat, G.A. (1997). Geografija i jekonomika: svjazi i zavisimosti (k poiskam putej razvitija jekonomicheskoj geografii) [Geography and Economy: Communication and Dependence (Search of the Ways of Economic Development Geography)]. Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Series: Geography, 6, 13-26.
2. Alaev, Je.B. (1977). Jekonomiko-geograficheskaja terminologija [Economic and Geographic Terminology]. Moscow: Mysl, 199.
3. Alaev, Je.B. (1980). Social’no-jekonomicheskaja geografija: Aktual’nye voprosy razvitija nauki [Socio-Economic Geography: Actual Problems of Development of Science]. Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Series: Geography, 4, 89-94.
4. Annenkov, V.V., Gerasimov, I.P., Minc, A.A. (1972). Jetapy razvitija sovremennoj geografii [Stages of Modern Development Geography]. Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Series: Geography, 3, 90-100.
5. Druzhinin, A.G. (1989). Geografija kul’tury: nekotorye aspekty formirovanija novogo nauchnogo napravlenija [Geography of Culture: Some Aspects of the Formative New Scientific Direction]. Proceedings of the VGO, 121 (4), 307-312.
6. Isachenko, A.G. (1990). Geografija na pereput’e: uroki proshlogo i puti perestrojki [Geography at the Crossroads: Lessons of the Past and Ways of Rebuild]. Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Series: Geography, 2, 127-137.
7. Isachenko, A.G. (1971). O yedinstve geografii [About Unity of Geography]. Proceedings of the VGO, 103 (4), 289-310.
8. Denisov, V. ed. (1987). Istoricheskij materializm kak metodologija poznanija i preobrazovanija obshhestvennoj zhizni [The Historically Materialism as Methodology Cognition and Transformation Social Life] Moscow: Nauka, 284.
9. Kotljakov, V.M. (1990). Geograficheskie aspekty novogo myshlenija [Geographic Aspects of the New Thinking]. Communist, 11, 61-70.
10. Kotljakov, V.M. (1990). Geograficheskaja nauka na poroge 90-h godov [Geographic Science at the Threshold of 90-s]. Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Series: Geography, 4, 5-16.
11. Kotljakov, V.M., Annenkov, V.V. (1989). XXVI Mezhdunarodnyj geograficheskij kongress [XXVI International Congress of Geography]. Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Series: Geography, 1, 7-19.
12. Lavrov, S.B., Agafonov, N.T. (1977). Principial’nye voprosy jekonomicheskoj geografii na XXIII Mezhdunarodnom geograficheskom kongresse [Actaul Problems on Economic Geography at the XXIII International Congress of Geography]. Proceedings of the VGO, 1, 4-7.
13. Lavrov, S.B., Agafonov, N.T. (1974). Teoreticheskie spory i nekotorye nauchno-prakticheskie zadachi jekonomicheskoj geografi [Theoretical Arguments and Some Scientific and Practical Problems of Economic Geography]. Proceedings of the VGO, 2, 148.
14. Lavrov, S.B., Sdasjuk, G.V. (1980). Sovetskaja social’no-jekonomicheskaja geografija: nekotorye aspekty mezhdunarodnogo znachenija [Soviet Socio-Economic Geography: Some Aspects of International Importance]. Regional Economic-Geographical Analysis and Forecasting, Frunze, 11-13.
15. Lenin, V.I. Otnoshenie k burzhuaznym partijam [Attitude to Bourgeois Parties]. PSS, 15, 7-68.
16. Lenin, V.I. O gosudarstve [About the State]. PSS, 39, 368-369.
17. Maksakovskij, V.P. (1998). Geograficheskaja kul’tura: Uchebnoe posobie dlja studentov vuzov [Geographic Culture: Textbook for students]. Moscow: Humanitarian Pub. Center VLADOS, 416.
18. Mashbic, Ja.G. (1990). Tendencii razvitija geograficheskoj mysli [Trends in the Development of Geographical Thought]. Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Series: Geography, 4, 17-27.
19. Mereste, U.I., Nimmik, S. Ja. (1984). Sovremennaja geografija: voprosy teorii [Modern Geography: Theoretical Problems]. Moscow: Mysl, 296.
20. Mukitanov, N.K. (1985). Ot Strabona do nashih dnej [From Strabo to the Today]. Moscow: Mysl, 234.
21. Pokshishevskij, V.V. (1974). O samom glavnom v jekonomicheskoj geografi [On the Most Important in Economic Geography]. Problems of Geography, 95, 25-42.
22. Preobrazhenskij, V.S. (1979). Fenomen geografii (razdum’ja geografa) [Geographical Phenomenon (Thoughts of Geographer)]. Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Series: Geography, 4, 20-27.
23. Saushkin, Ju.G. (1980). Geograficheskaja nauka v proshlom, nastojashhem, budushhem: Posobije dlja uchititelej [Geographical Sciences in the Past, Present, Future: Textbook for Teacher]. Moscow: Prosveshcheniie, 269.
24. Perspektivy geografii [Prospects of Geography]. (1976). One Hundred Collections «Problems of Geography». Moscow: Mysl, 100, 254.
25. Topchijev, O.H. (2001). Osnovy suspilʹnoji heohrafiji: Navch. Posibnyk [Basis of Social Geography: Manual]. Odesa: Astroprynt, 560.
26. Topchijev, O.H. (2006). Konceptualʹno-ponjattjevyjj aparat i predmetna oblastʹ heohrafiji [Conceptual Apparatus and Subject Area in Geography]. Theoretical and Methodological Problems of Social Geography: Coll. Scien. Works in Honour of Honoured Professor of Lviv Ivan Franko National University Oleh Shablii. Lviv: Pub. Center LNU named by Ivan Franko, 77-84.
27. Shablij, O.I. (2012). Osnovy suspilʹnoji heohrafiji: pidruchnyk dlja studentiv vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladiv [Basis of Social Geography: Textbook for Students of Higher Education Institutions]. Lviv: LNU named by Ivan Franko, 296.
28. Barans’kij, N.N. ed. (1965). Jekonomicheskaja geografija v SSSR: istorija i sovremennoe razvitie [Economic Geography in the USSR: History and Modern Development]. Moscow: Prosveshcheniie, 653.
29. Gillmor Desmond, A. (1968). Economic Geography: its Scope, Development and Methodology. Geogr. Viewpoint, 1 (5), 251-260. (Ekonomichna heohrafija – jiji zmist, rozvytok i metodolohija).
30. Mazúr, T. (1968). Geography of Today and its Perspective. Geogr. časop., 20 (3), 201-211. (Suchasna heohrafija i jiji perspektyvy).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 B. О. Chernov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
