Space transformations of urban peripheral and industrial areas in Ukraine (on the example of cities of Zaporizhia and Zhovti Vody)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2017-46-09Keywords:
spatial transformations, modernization, post-socialist city, industrial city, monofunctional city, socio-spatial processes, Zaporizhia, Zhovti VodyAbstract
The aim of the study: Given the key role of cities in spatial development, problems of their evolution and transformation turned into extremely important subject of geographical research. Spatial and functional transformations in post-socialist cities of East Central Europe, including the former Soviet Union, constitute a separate layer for scientific conceptualization. Despite the wide range of publications dealing with transformations of post-socialist cities, insufficient attention is paid to spatial transformation in cities that have developed in industrial regions and grow by virtue of industrial production. Therefore, the purpose of this article was to determine the main trends and peculiarities of the spatial transformations in peripheral industrial urban areas in Ukraine.
Research methods: Two cities, Zaporizhia and Zhovti Vody, both located in Dnieper industrial region, were selected to be case-studies. The test areas were selected in the central parts of the studied cities due to the primary interest in the nature of urban space adaptation to the new social values and demands. Residential buildings, non-residential constructions and infrastructure within the test areas were evaluated in terms of their functional profile and condition (level of renewation or modernization).
Results: The following key foci of the spatial transformations were identified: public transport stops and lines, major trade and entertainment facilities, current and former industrial areas, open public spaces, sacral objects and spaces. These foci can be characterized as the agents of spatial transformations, since they trigger further changes in the surrounding urban areas. The data collected made it possible to identify the following integrated socio-spatial processes: socio-spatial polarization, commercialization of public spaces, de-industrialization, revitalization, segregation and gentrification. Most of them were observed in both cities, but have different intensity and manifestations, except for gentrification apparent only in Zaporizhia. The differences between the transformation processes in Zaporizhia and Zhovti Vody are both quantitative and qualitative and generated due to differences in urban population, administrative status, and position in the spatial framework. However, in general, spatial transformations in both cities have the same course and are caused by the similar factors.
Scientific novelty: The paper for the first time represents comparative analysis of trends and peculiarities of the spatial transformations in peripheral-industrial urban areas in Ukraine using original methods.
Practical significance: The obtained results, specifically knowledge on the main spatial transformation agents and their interaction, may be used in urban planning process for more effective solutions in terms of urban areas modernization.
References
Bulinina, N. S. (2003). Osobennosti transformatsii gorodskogo prostranstva Nizhnego Novgoroda. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 6, 2-8.
Golubchikov O. Yu., Mahrova A. G. (2013). Faktory neravnomernogo razvitiya rossiyskih gorodov. Moscow University Herald. Geography, 2, 54-60.
Denysenko, O. O. (2012). Protsesy metropolizatsiyi: svitohospodars'kyy aspect. Кyiv: Institute of Geography of the National Academy of Science of Ukraine.
Druzhinin, A. G. (2008). Prostranstvennoe razvitie goroda-millionera: tendentsii postsovetskogo perioda. Rostov-on-Don.
Mezentsev, K. V., Mezentseva, N. I., Bura, T. L. (2011). Transformatsiya publichnykh prostoriv u velykykh mistakh Ukrayiny na prykladi torhovel'no-rozvazhal'nykh tsentriv. Ekonomichna ta Sotsialna Geografiya, 63, 172-184.
Mezentsev, K. V., Mezentseva, N. I. (2011). Publichni prostory Kyyeva: zabezpechenist' naselennya ta suchasna transformatsiya. Human Geography Journal, 11 (2), 39-47.
Mel'nyk, L., Oreshchenko, A., Batychenko, S. (2016). Transformatsiyi mis'koho prostoru na prykladi testovoyi dilyanky v misti Luts'k. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Geography, 1(64), 53-57.
Mel'nychuk, A., Kauk, Yu., Pal'chuk, M. (2012). Tendentsiyi transformatsiyi perevazhayuchykh mis'kykh funktsiy v mezhakh Pechers'koho rayonu mista Kyyeva pochatku XXI st. Ekonomichna ta Sotsialna Geografiya, 65, 173-183.
Turgel, I. D. (2013). «Vtorye» goroda gornozavodskogo Urala: opyt instytutsional’no-evolyutsionnogo analiza. Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya I praktika, 44 (323), 2-13.
Sheptukhina, L. I., Yevseev, O. S. (2014). Covremennye tendentsii transformatsii gorodskogo prostranstva. Regionalnoe razvitie, 3, 4, 125-129.
11. Bernt, M., Gentile, M., Marcińczak, S. (2015). Gentrification in post-communist countries: an introduction. Geografie, 120(2), 104-112.
12. Brade, I., Axenov, K., Bondarchuk, E. (2006). The Transformation of Urban Space in Post-Soviet Russia. New York: Routledge.
13. Gentile, M. (2004). Divided post‐soviet small cities? Residential segregation and urban form in Leninogorsk and Zyryanovsk, Kazakhstan. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 86, 2, 117-136.
14. Gentile, M., Salukvadze, J., Gogishvili, D. (2015). Newbuild Gentrification, Tele-urbanization and Urban Grows: Placing the Cities of the post-Communist South in the Gentrification Debate. Geografie, 2, 134-163.
15. Kovacs, Z., Wiessner, R., Zischner, R. (2012). Urban renewal in the inner city of Budapest: Gentrification from a post-socialist perspective. Urban Studies, 50 (1), 22-38. Doi: 10.1177/0042098012453856
16. Marcińczak, S., Sagan, I. (2011). The socio-spatial restructuring of Łodź, Poland. Urban Studies, 48, 9, 1789-1809.
17. Melnychuk, A., Kovalchuk, S. (2015). Modern spatial transformation in Holosiivskyi district of Kyiv. Ekonomichna ta Sotsialna Geografiya, 73, 65-75. Doi: 10.17721/2413-7154/2015.73.65-75.
18. Melnychuk, A., Khmelnytskyi, O. (2015). Directions and peculiarities of territorial functional changes in a medium size Ukrainian town in the post-soviet period of development (case of Berdychiv). Ekonomichna ta Sotsialna Geografiya, 71, 68-74. Doi: 10.17721/2413-7154/2015.71.68-74.
19. Nae, M., Turnock, D. (2011). City profile: The new Bucharest: Two decades of restructuring. Cities, 28 (2), 206-219.
20. Scott, J. W., Kuhn, M. (2012). Urban change and urban development strategies in Central East Europe: A selective assessment of events since 1989. European Planning Studies, 20 (7), 1093-1109.
21. Sýkora, L., Bouzarovski, S. (2012). Multiple Transformations: Conceptualising the Post-communist Urban Transition. Urban Studies, 49 (1), 43-60.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Олексій Михайлович Гнатюк
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).