THE STRATEGIES OF THE MANAGING OF THE PROCESSES OF THE GIFTED PERSON INTERNALIZATION OF CULTURAL VALUES DURING NATION-BUILDING IN UKRAINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-0285.2.2014.147052Keywords:
gifted person, reading and artistic interests and needs, strategies of the management, internalization of cultural valuesAbstract
This article reviews the new management strategy processes of internalization of cultural property gifted person in terms of nation-building in Ukraine. The author of the study based on the best domestic and international experience gained in a designated area.
To define the modern strategies of management of the internalization processes of cultural properties of gifted person in terms of nation-building in Ukraine, the author of the article conducted sociological studies, which included questionnaires and oral interviews talented students in higher educational institutions of Ukraine. In this process we used the method of conversation. The sample was 2500 people. Gifted students should have not only the appropriate knowledge and information from the literature, but they also should have the specific skills of evaluation, analysis, systemizing, using their knowledge in practice. This is an integral part of such thing as reading culture.
The first category of respondents conventionally have been attributed to the "humanities." The question "What subjects do you most enjoy watching?". The 37% of respondents answered that they had liked the humanities. The second category of gifted students were the "artists." Among the 32% of respondents preferred subjects of art and artistic cycle such as piano, vocal, choral conducting, visual arts, choreography, design etc. The third category were "economists and lawyers" (the 7% of them preferred subjects of economic and the 5 % of them preffered the jurisprudential cycle), and the fourth one were "naturalists, scientists", 19% of them called subjects of science series such physics, mathematics, chemistry etc.
The 41.1% of the respondents "humanitarians", answering the questionnaire "What book edition do you prefer?" called fiction, the 17% of them called books on art, art history, the 11.1% of them named the educational one, the 7% of them named the scientific popular publications, the 5.3% of them – socio-economic literature, the 3,2% of them – religious one, the 3.1% of them – books and textbooks, the 2,6% of them – natural scientific literature, the 2%of them – philosophical, the 2.2% of them – literature on cultural studies, the 2.1% of them – political, the 1.5% of them – technical, the 0.95% of them – art literature, the 0,85% of them – psychological.
The question was 'What genres and topics you prefer to book literature?" The humanists said that they are most interested in classics (14.6%), poetry (9.2%), historical novel (8.7%), realistic story (7.3%), modern fiction (6.8%). The 6.5% of respondents like adventure, 6,4% – scientific fiction and fantasy, 5.5% – the modern novel, 5% – drama, the 4.6% of respondents admired detectives. In reading the 3.7% of respondents the specialty books dominate in such spheres historical – 3.3%, 3.2% – on religious subjects, 3.1% – political stories, 2.9% – horror and mysticism, 2 5% – melodrama (female romance).
Publications on parenting are interested in the 1.2% of respondents, books about sex – 1.1%, interests (publications on gardening, housekeeping, cooking, etc.) – 1%, comedy books – 1%, astrology – 0.9%, psychology – 0.85%, esoteric – 0.65%.
The 42.2% of respondents, being classified as "artist", responding to the questionnaire "What book edition do you prefer?" called fiction, 19% – books on art, art history, 9.7% – Fine Arts, 7 2% – religious, 7.1% – psychological, 4% – philosophical, 3.2% – cultural studies, 1.8% – books and textbooks, 1,3% – literature on education, 1.2% – scientific and popular publications, 1,1% – political literature, 0,9% – socio-economic, 0,8% – natural scientific literature, 0.5% – the technical literature.
The question was 'What genres and topics you prefer to book literature?" The artists responded that they are most interested in classics (24.6%) and modern prose (11.8%). Poetry is being interested in – the 9.5% of respondents, historical novel – 6.6%, the modern novel – 6.3% and 5.8% – detectives. The structure of reading the 5.5% of respondents in this category a realistic novel dominated, adventure – 5.4%, fiction and fantasy – 4,4%, book comedy – 4.2%, drama – 3.8%. Publication of the specialty are interesting for the 2.7% of respondents, historical – 2.3%, religious – 1.1%, a political novel – 1%. The 0.9% of respondents like to read horror and mysticism, 0.8% – melodrama (female romance).
Books on parenting interested in 0.7% of the respondents about sex – 0.7% interest (publications on gardening, housekeeping, cooking, etc.) – 0.6%, astrology – 0.6%, psychology – 0 5%, esoteric – 0.2%.
The 34% of respondents classified as "economists and lawyers' answers to the questionnaire" What book edition do you prefer? " called fiction, 25.7% – socio-economic, 10% – natural sciences, 9% – philosophical, 6.2% – political, 5.8% – scientific and popular publications, 3% – books and textbooks, 2,1% – religious literature, 2% – on art, art history, 1% – the literature of cultural studies, 0.5% – educational, 0, 3% – technical, 0.2% – fine Arts, 0.2% – psychology.
The tastes of this group of readers by genre and theme, divided in such a way poetry – 15.7%, classics – 13.6%, drama – 10%, a historical novel – 6.7%. The 6.4% of respondents like to read horror and mysticism, 5.5% – modern prose, 4.1% – a realistic story, 4.8% – scientific fiction and fantasy, 4,6% – detectives, 3.5% – adventures. The books on specialty preferred the 3.5% of respondentsv, comedy genre – 3.4%, a historical novel – 3.1%, political – 2.7%. The religious topics of interest of the 3% of the respondents, 1.4% prefer the modern novel, 1.3% – melodrama (female romance).
Books about sex are interesting for 2%, the education of children – 1.2%. Books of interest – 1%, astrology – 0.1%, psychology – 2%, esoteric – 0.4%.
The 49.6% respondents – "naturalists, scientists" among the priorities of book editions called natural-scientific literature, 11.7% – artistic, 9.5% – technical, 7.1% – books and textbooks, 5.1% – political literature, 5% – popular science, 2.8% – philosophical, 2.3% – books on art, art history, 2% – education, 1.9% – socioeconomic, 1.1% – religious, 0.8% – the literature of cultural studies, 0.6% – the literature of the fine arts, 0.5% – psychology.
As for genres and themes of books, the most popular among the readers of this book are in the category of specialty – the 39.7% of respondents, historical – 8.3%, classics – 7.4%, poetry – 5.2%, a historical novel – 5.1 %, realistic story – 4.7%, political novel – 4.1%, modern prose – 3.7%. The 3.4% of respondents like adventure, 3.3% – scientific fiction and fantasy, 2.4% prefer the modern novel, 2.2% – drama, 2.1% – the publication of comedy, 2% – astrology, 1.7% – psychology, 1.4% – detective, 1.1% – religious subjects, 0.9% – horror and mysticism, 0.5% – melodrama (female romance).
Publication of parenting are interesting for 0.4%, a book about sex – 0.2% interest publications – 0.2%.
The author of the article also carried out the sociological and cultural analysis of the interests and priorities of the gifted person in the field of music. The 32% of respondents preferred the subjects of art and artistic cycle such as piano, vocal, choral conducting, visual arts, choreography, design, etc. On the basis of which they were classified as "artists." The largest number of respondents preferred piano and symphonic art (55, 8%). The second of the most popular with respondents artists is vocal art (22, 1%). On third place on the popularity of the respondents is choral art (15, 3%).
The author proved the possibility of optimal control of the process of internalization of cultural properties gifted person in conditions amounting personal interests and needs that have the diverse orientation.
References
Ибрагимов Т. М. Экспертная система развития научных способностей молодых исследователей / Т. М. Ибрагимов / Математическое моделирование информационных процессов и систем в науке, технике и образовании : межвуз. Сб. науч. Тр. – Самара, 2005. – С. 200-202.
Мощь Интернета для обучения / Доклад Комиссии Конгресса США, 2000 г. = The power of the Internet for learning: moving from promise to practice, Report of the Web-based Education Commission. – Washington DC, December 2000.
Одаренность: рабочая концепция / Материалы I Международной конференции (Самара 1–3 октября, 2000.). – М., 2002. – С. 143-150.
Пиявский С. А. Система поиска, развития, поддержки и профессионально-творческой подготовки одаренной молодежи и закрепления ее в региональной инфраструктуре научно-исследовательской деятельности / С. А. Пиявский, В.С. Кагерманьян, Н. А. Маркова / Аналитические обзоры по основным направлениям развития высшего образования. – Вып. 9. – М., 2003. – 60 с.
Пиявский С.А. Вузовское молодежное интернет-сообщество /Пиявский С.А. // Вестник высшей школы. – 2003. – № 8. – С. 24-29.
Пиявский С.А. Стратегия оптимального управления развитием научных способностей в информационном обществе, Одаренность: рабочая концепція / Пиявский С.А. // Материалы I Международной конференции (Самара, 1-3 октября. – 2000.). – М., 2002. – С. 143-150.
Терепищий С. О. Обдарована молодь України: оцінка сучасного стану та поширення перспективного досвіду роботи з обдарованою молоддю в регіонах України / Терепищий С.О. [та ін.]. – К. : ВМГО "Союз обдарованої молоді", 2008. – 155 с.
Ibragimov T.M. Expert system development of scientific skills of young researchers / T.M. Ibragimov / Mathematical modeling of information systems and processes in science, technology and education: Hi. Coll. scientific. Tr. – Samara, 2005. – Р. 200-202.
The power of the Internet for learning / Report of the Commission of the US Congress, 2000 = The power of the Internet for learning: moving from promise to practice, Report of the Web-based Education Commission. – Washington DC, December 2000.
Talent: Working concept / Proceedings of the I International Conference (Samara 1-3 October, 2000). – M., 2002. – p. 143-150.
Piyavskii S.A. Search system, development, support and vocational training of creative and talented youth to consolidate its regional infrastructure research activities / S.A. Piyavskii, V.S. Kagermanyan, N. Markov / Analytical reviews in key areas of higher education. – Vol. 9. – M., 2003. – 60 p.
Piyavskii S.A. Undergraduate youth online community / Herald of high school. – 2003. – № 8. – P. 24-29.
Piyavskii S.A. Optimal control strategy development of scientific skills in the information society, the gifted: working concept / Proceedings of the I International Conference (Samara, October 1-3. – 2000). – M., 2002. – p. 143-150.
Terepyschyy SA Gifted Youth of Ukraine: assessment of the current state and the spread of long-term experience with talented young people in the regions of Ukraine / SO Terepyschyy [et al.]. – K: YPO "Union Gifted Youth", 2008. – 155 p.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Almanac "Culture and Contemporaneity"
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).