THE INSTITUTIONAL ROLE OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY IN ENSURING THE ECONOMIC SECURITY OF UKRAINE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63978/3083-6476.2026.1.4.03

Keywords:

knowledge economy, economic security, intellectual potential, regionalization, human capital, institutional transformations, labor market

Abstract

The article examines the fundamental role of the knowledge economy as a strategic institution for ensuring Ukraine's economic security amidst global transformations and wartime challenges. Traditional factors of production are progressively losing their dominant significance, giving way to intellectual capital and innovative competencies. Under these conditions, a profound scientific need arises to redefine the category of "economic security" through the lens of knowledge reproduction and protection, which dictates the choice of the research topic.

The Objective of the article is to provide a theoretical and methodological substantiation of the institutional role of the knowledge economy within the state's economic security system and to develop strategic approaches to the regionalization of educational and scientific processes to minimize threats to human potential.

The study is based on institutional and systemic approaches. Methods of logical generalization (to clarify the categorical apparatus), matrix modeling (to illustrate systemic transformations at the regional level), and comparative analysis (to study exogenous and endogenous threats) were applied.

The author proves that the economic security of the knowledge sphere is characterized by the system's ability to respond adequately to destabilizing factors, ensuring the continuous adaptation of economic mechanisms to changing environments. Exogenous (external) and endogenous (internal) threats are identified, with technological dependence and interregional "brain drain" highlighted as the most critical.

Particular attention is paid to the concept of regionalization. It is substantiated that shifting the management center of reproductive processes to the regional level allows for the creation of flexible adaptive systems where the intellectual potential of higher education becomes a baseline resource for territorial development. A model of systemic transformations is proposed, based on changing the state's role from rigid administration to "soft" regulation through standardization and certification.

The article addresses the imperfections of the market mechanism for labor regulation, manifested in low resource mobility and information asymmetry. The author argues that the necessity for state forecasting of the workforce stems from the limited substitutability of specific intellectual qualifications. The study concludes that the economic security of regions directly depends on the development of postgraduate education and scientific training systems capable of reproducing new professional elites.

It is concluded that investments in the knowledge economy not only ensure technological advancement but also contribute to social stability by narrowing income gaps and increasing population mobility. The practical significance of the work lies in the possibility of using the proposed models to develop regional economic security strategies and programs for the post-war recovery of Ukraine's intellectual capital.

References

Heiets, V. M. (2021). Endohenni chynnyky ekonomichnoho rozvytku Ukrainy [Endogenous factors of economic development of Ukraine]. Ekonomika Ukrainy, 1, 3-18 [in Ukrainian].

Drucker, P. (2020). Postkapitalistychne suspilstvo [Post-capitalist society]. Kyiv: KM Publishing [in Ukrainian].

Bazylevych, V. D. (2019). Ekonomika znan [Knowledge economy]. Kyiv: Znannia [in Ukrainian].

Zhalilo, Ya. A. (2022). Ekonomichna bezpeka derzhavy v umovakh hlobalnykh transformatsii [Economic security of the state in the context of global transformations]. Kyiv: NISD [in Ukrainian].

North, D. (2000). Instytutsii, instytutsiina zmina ta funktsionuvannia ekonomiky [Institutions, institutional change and the functioning of the economy]. Kyiv: Osnovy [in Ukrainian].

Moisio, S. (2018). Geopolitics of the Knowledge-Based Economy. London: Routledge. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315742984.

Nee, V., & Wang, G. (2024). Sources of Regional Advantage: Emergence of a Global Knowledge Economy. Working Paper, Cornell University.

Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy. 98, 5, S71-S102.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Veselinovič, J. (2024). A Knowledge Regime Fit for Geoeconomics? The Changing Production, Consumption and Practices of Policy Knowledge in the EU. European Foreign Affairs Review, 29, 2, 177-204. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2024008.

Ansoff, H. I. (1979). Strategic Management. New York: Wiley Wiley.

Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.

Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Amavilah, V., Asongu, S. A., & Andrés, A. R. (2014). Globalization, Peace & Stability, Governance, and Knowledge Economy. Development Research Working Paper Series, 04/2014. La Paz: INESAD.

Asongu, S. A. (2017). Knowledge Economy Gaps, Policy Syndromes and Catch-up Strategies: Fresh South Korean Lessons to Africa. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8, 1, 211-253.

Asongu, S. A., & Nwachukwu, J. C. (2016). The Role of Lifelong Learning in Political Stability and NonViolence: Evidence from Africa. Journal of Economic Studies, 43, 1, 141-164.

Asongu, S. A., & Nwachukwu, J. C. (2019). Who is Who in Knowledge Economy in Africa? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 10, 1, 333-362.

European Commission, (2024). The Future of European Competitiveness: A Competitiveness Strategy for Europe. Part B: In-depth Analysis. Brussels: EC.

Machlup, F. (1962). The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Moisio, S. (2018). Geopolitics of the Knowledge-Based Economy: The Case of Finland. in Knowledge Economy and the City. London: Routledge, 45-67.

Nee, V., Wang, G., & Macy, M. (2023). Knowledge Spillover and Network Rewiring in the Emergence of a Global Knowledge Economy. Working Paper. Center for the Study of Economy and Society, Cornell University.

Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Free Press. New York: Free Press.

Stewart, T. A. (1997). Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations, Doubleday. New York: Doubleday.

Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave, Bantam Books. New York: Bantam Books.

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Datsii, O. (2026). THE INSTITUTIONAL ROLE OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY IN ENSURING THE ECONOMIC SECURITY OF UKRAINE. Military Strategy and Technology, (1(4), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.63978/3083-6476.2026.1.4.03

Issue

Section

НАЦІОНАЛЬНА БЕЗПЕКА ТА ОБОРОНА