Modern vocal performance as the preservation of the spiritual values of Ukrainian culture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-2180.38.2020.222113Keywords:
vocal performance, spiritual values, Ukrainian cultureAbstract
The purpose of the article is the analysis of modern vocal art as a spiritual carrier of the values of the Ukrainian mentality and their reflection in the cultural space. The methodology is the application of comparative, historical, and logical methods, as well as empirical, general scientific (analysis, synthesis) methods. Scientific novelty. The article attempts to analyze the current state of vocal art, its typical modern factors of development, as well as the peculiarities of functioning in the globalization processes of cultural space. Special emphasis is placed on the formation of a modern concept of preserving values through vocal and poetic language. Conclusions: vocal performance exists in space and is a conceptual image of contemporary events and moods in society. Due to the vocal art, which is connected with the verbal component, the most complete embodiment of the cultural space of the epoch is possible. Vocal art as one that is positionally accessible to humanity and an immanent feature of the archetypes of the Ukrainian mentality, as well as provides opportunities through the poetic word enshrined in the actualization of the boundaries of the supra-individual, social, historical experience of individuals in a particular field of culture. components in cultural processes that are able to reflect the individual-national and global context and thus be a means of preserving spiritual values.References
Andguladze N. (2003). Homo cantor. Essays on vocal art. Moscow: Agraf, 240 p. [in Russian].
Aref'eva A. (2017). Globalization processes in the culture of the present. Gilea: scientific bulletin, vol. 116. Kyiv: Gilea, p.185-189 [in Ukrainian].
Kablova T. (2015). F. Nietzsche on the cultural potential of the spirit of music. Culture and modernity: an almanac. Kyiv: Millennium, 2. p. 51-56. [in Ukrainian].
Kablova T., Teterya V. (2018). The specifics of academic flag art in modern cultural discourse. Culture and modernity: an almanac. Kyiv: Millennium, 1. p. 73-77. [in Ukrainian]. 5. Krymsʹkyy S. (2003). Queries of philosophical meanings. Kyiv: PARAPAN, 240 p. [in Ukrainian].
Lyubimtsev K. (2010). Culture of a modernizing society: between progress and tradition. Knowledge. Skill.1. P. 70–74 [in Russian].
Ustyugova E. (2003). Globalization and culture. St. Petersburg: Janus, S. 25-46. [in Russian].
Kulturfoerderung in gemeinsamer Verantwortung (II). (1996). Die Krise ueberwinden .ARCultMedia. № 2. S. 8-15. [in German].
Nash K. Global Culture: Globalization as Postmodernization (2002) Contemporary Political Sociology. Oxford, 309 p [in English].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Sofia Leontieva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
