Influence of different photoperiodic conditions on the protein and oil content in soybean seeds (Glycine Max (L.) Merr.)

Authors

  • Nаbil Hussein Al-Hamadeni Hider V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Svobody sq., 4, Kharkiv, Ukraina, 61022, Ukraine
  • Vasily Zhmurko V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Svobody sq., 4, Kharkiv, Ukraina, 61022, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3898-3087

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-8025.2020.201416

Keywords:

soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.), Photoperiod, development rate, protein, oil

Abstract

Aim. Find out the effect of different durations of the photoperiod on the protein and oil content in the seeds of soybean varieties, which differ in response to the photoperiod.

Materials and methods. The experiments used photoperiodically neutral soybean varieties Annushka, Yatran, Ustya, as well as a short-day variety Khadzhibey. Plants were grown in the field 2016-2018 year at the experimental site of the Department of Physiology and Biochemistry of Plants and Microorganisms of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University on plots of 1 m2 in triplicate. From seedlings to the third true leaf, the plants grew with a natural long day (about 16 hours at the latitude of Kharkov - 50º N). In this phase, half of the plants were exposed to a short photoperiod for 14 days, darkening the plants with light-tight booths from 17 to 9 hours. After which the plants were grown again under long day conditions until the end of the growing season. The second part of the plants (control) during the entire growing season was grown under natural day conditions. The protein content in the seeds was determined on an infrared analyzer Infralum FT-10 (manufacturer Lumex, RF), according to the manufacturer's method, and oil - according to Rushkovsky. Analyzes were performed in two triplicate. The tables show the mean and standard deviations.

Results. The protein content in seeds under the influence of a short photoperiod increased, decreased or did not change, compared with the content on a long day, regardless of the type of photoperiodic reaction of the studied varieties. The oil content in the seeds of all varieties, regardless of their photoperiodic reaction, exposed to a short photoperiod, as a rule, was lower than in the seeds of plants that were grown on a long day.

Changes in the protein and oil content in the seeds of soybean varieties with different day lengths did not depend on the type of photoperiodic reaction.

The content of both protein and oil in seeds varied in different varieties and in different years of research. The degree of variation in different varieties was different.

Conclusions. Different photoperiodic conditions ambiguously influenced the protein content in the seeds of soybean varieties with different photoperiodic reactions, although in some years there was a tendency to increase it under the influence of a short photoperiod. Apparently, it is determined by the genotype of the variety and the meteorological conditions of the growing season.

The oil content in the seeds of the studied varieties, which differ in the type of photoperiodic reaction, decreased under the influence of a short day, compared with the content under long day conditions.

Apparently, the process of accumulation of protein and, especially, oil in soybean seeds is subject to photoperiodic control. Its mechanisms need in-depth studies at the level of physiological and biochemical processes.

Author Biographies

Nаbil Hussein Al-Hamadeni Hider, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Svobody sq., 4, Kharkiv, Ukraina, 61022

Postgraduate Student

Department of Physiology and Biochemistry of Plants and Microorganisms

Vasily Zhmurko, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Svobody sq., 4, Kharkiv, Ukraina, 61022

Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor

Department Physiology and Biochemistry of Plants and Microorganisms

References

  1. Petibskaia, V. S.; Lukomets, V. M. (Ed.) (2012). Soia: khimicheskii sostav i ispolzovanie. Maikop: OAO «Poligraf-IUG», 432.
  2. Vishniakova, M. A., Seferova, I. V., Samsonova, M. G. (2017). Trebovanie k iskhodnomu materialu dlia selektsii soi v kontekste sovremennykh biotekhnologii. Selskokhoziaistvennaia biologiia, 52 (5), 906–916.
  3. Song, W., Yang, R., Wu, T., Wu, C., Sun, S., Zhang, S. et. al. (2016). Analyzing the Effects of Climate Factors on Soybean Protein, Oil Contents, and Composition by Extensive and High-Density Sampling in China. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 64 (20), 4121–4130. doi: http://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00008
  4. United States Department of Agriculture, World Agricultural Production (2020). Circular Series February 2–20. USDA. Foraing Agr. Servise. Available at: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/production.pdf
  5. Zhmurko, V. V., Avksentieva, O. O., Yukhno, Yu. Yu., Popova, Yu. V., Samoilov, A. M. Tymoshenko, V. F. et. al. (2017). Efekty heniv fotoperiodychnoi chutlyvosti i potreby v yarovyzatsii u roslyn pshenytsi miakoi ta soi kulturnoi. Fiziolohiia roslyn: dosiahnennia ta novi napriamy rozvytku. Kyiv: Lohos, 187–197.
  6. Zhmurko, V. V. (2009). Fizioloho-biokhimichni aspekty fotoperiodychnoho i yarovyzatsiinoho kontroliu rozvytku roslyn. Kyiv, 43.
  7. Davydenko, O. H., Zhmurko, V. V., Holoienko, D. V., Rozentsveih, V. E., Shablinska, O. V. (2004). Proiav fotoperiodychnoi reaktsii u rannostyhlykh sortiv soi. Selektsiia i nasinnytstvo, 88, 151–162.
  8. Jiang, B., Nan, H., Gao, Y., Tang, L., Yue, Y., Lu, S. et. al. (2014). Allelic Combinations of Soybean Maturity Loci E1, E2, E3 and E4 Result in Diversity of Maturity and Adaptation to Different Latitudes. PLoS ONE, 9 (8), e106042. doi: http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106042
  9. Xia, Z., Watanabe, S., Yamada, T., Tsubokura, Y., Nakashima, H., Zhai, H. et. al. (2012). Positional cloning and characterization reveal the molecular basis for soybean maturity locus E1 that regulates photoperiodic flowering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109 (32), E2155–E2164. doi: http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117982109
  10. Kobyzieva, L. N. (2015). Skryninh kolektsii soi NTsHRRU za vmistom v nasinni bilka ta zhyru. Selektsiia i nasinnytstvo, 108, 53–59.
  11. Novikova, L. Y., Seferova, I. V., Nekrasov, A. Y., Perchuk, I. N., Shelenga, T. V., Samsonova, M. G., Vishnyakova, M. A. (2018). Impact of weather and climate on seed protein and oil content of soybean in the North Сaucasus. Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding, 22 (6), 708–715. doi: http://doi.org/10.18699/vj18.414
  12. Abugaliyeva, A. I., Didorenko, S. V. (2016). Genetic diversity of soybean cultivars belonging to different ripeness groups with regard to performance and quality. Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding, 20 (3), 303–310. doi: http://doi.org/10.18699/vj16.168
  13. Ojo, D. K., Adebisi, M. A., Tijani, B. O. (2002). Influence of environment on protein and oil contents of soybeans seed (Glycine Max (L.) Merril). Global Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1 (1), 27–32. doi: http://doi.org/10.4314/gjass.v1i1.2199
  14. Bellaloui, N., Bruns, H. A., Abbas, H. K., Mengistu, A., Fisher, D. K., Reddy, K. N. (2015). Agricultural practices altered soybean seed protein, oil, fatty acids, sugars, and minerals in the Midsouth USA. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6 (31), 1–14. doi: http://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00031
  15. Sudaric, A., Simic, D., Vrataric, M. (2006). Characterization of genotype by environment interactions in soybean breeding programmes of southeast Europe. Plant Breeding, 125 (2), 191–194. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2006.01185.x
  16. Song, W., Yang, R., Yang, X., Sun, S., Mentreddy, S. R., Jiang, B. et. al. (2018). Spatial differences in soybean bioactive components across China and their influence by weather factors. The Crop Journal, 6 (6), 659–668. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2018.05.001
  17. Mysak, E. V., Selikhova, O. A. (2017). Izmenenie biokhimicheskogo sostava zerna soi v zavisimosti ot prodolzhitelnosti dnia. Prioritetnye napravleniia otraslevogo nauchnogo obespecheniia, tekhnologii proizvodstva, khraneniia i pererabotki selskokhoziaistvennoi produktsii. Krasnodar: FGBNU SKFNTSSVV, 245.
  18. Zhmurko, V. V., Khaider, Nabil Khusein Al-Khamadeni (2018). Vliianie prodolzhitelnosti fotoperioda na formirovanie plodov u sortov soi (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Faktori eksperimentalnoi evoliutsіi organіzmіv, 23, 57–63.
  19. Ermakova, A. I. (Ed.) (1987). Metody biokhimicheskogo issledovaniia rastenii. Leningrad: Agropromizdat, 430.
  20. Dospekhov, B. A. (1985). Metodika polevogo opyta (s osnovami statisticheskoi obrabotki rezultatov issledovanii). Moscow: Agropromizdat, 351.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-28

How to Cite

Hider, N. H. A.-H., & Zhmurko, V. (2020). Influence of different photoperiodic conditions on the protein and oil content in soybean seeds (Glycine Max (L.) Merr.). ScienceRise: Biological Science, (1 (22), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-8025.2020.201416

Issue

No. 1 (22) (2020)

Section

Biological Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Nаbil Hussein Al-Hamadeni Hider, Vasily Zhmurko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.