The analysis of vitality structure of Chimaphila Umbellata (L.) W. Barton CENOpopulations in forest phytocenoses of the novgorod-sivers’k polissia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-8025.2017.94019

Keywords:

cenopopulation, vitality, vitality structure of cenopopulations, quality index, Chimaphila umbellatа

Abstract

The population analysis included nine Chimaphila umbellatа cenopopulations from different groups, typical for Novgorod Siver’sk Polissia: Pinetum (sylvestris) pleuroziosum (schreberi), Pinetum (sylvestris) callunoso (vulgaris)–pleuroziosum (schreberi), Pinetum (sylvestris) vaccinioso (myrtilli)–pleuroziosum (schreberi), Pinetum (sylvestris) convallarioso (majalis)–pleuroziosum (schreberi), Pinetum (sylvestris) franguloso (alni)–vaccinioso (myrtilli)–pleuroziosum (schreberi), Pinetum (sylvestris) sorboso (aucuparii) –convallarioso (majalis)–pleuroziosum (schreberi), Querceto (roboris)– Pinetum (sylvestris) pleuroziosum (schreberi), Pineto (sylvestris)–Betuletum (pendulae) vaccinioso (myrtilli)–pleuroziosum (schreberi), Betuletum (pendulae) vaccinioso (myrtilli)– pleuroziosum (schreberi).

The aim of research was to explain the features of vitality structure of Chimaphila umbellatа cenopopulations in aforesaid forest phytocenoses of studied region.

The morphometric analysis, attended by the assessment of 17 morphometric parameters in Chimaphila umbellatа plants was used during the research. In the same time the algorithm of vitality analysis, attended by determination of correlations between morphoparameters and estimation of their factor loads, was realized.

It was established, that in Chimaphila umbellatа plants at the level of correlation r=0,85 and higher, the dimensional values form four pleiads. Most factor loads were registered in indices of leaves mass, general area of leaf surface, general phytomass, number of leaves, photosynthetic effort and also ratio between the area of leaf surface and phytomass. On the base of combination of correlative and factor solution among the totality of morphoparameters that characterize the state of Chimaphila umbellatа ramets of generative ontogenetic state we fixed the dimensional parameters that determine the vitality of plant of this specie: general phytomass of plants, general area of leaf surface and photosynthetic effort.

The results of vitality analysis testified that Chimaphila umbellatа cenopopulations are rather diverse by vitality structure. Their signs correspond to all three vitality types: depressive, moderate and flourishing. The depressive one is cenopopulation from the group Pinetum (sylvestris) vaccinioso (myrtilli)–pleuroziosum (schreberi). The moderate include cenopopulations from the groups Pinetum (sylvestris) callunoso (vulgaris)–pleuroziosum (schreberi), Querceto (roboris)–Pinetum (sylvestris) pleuroziosum (schreberi), Pineto (sylvestris)–Betuletum (pendulae) vaccinioso (myrtilli)–pleuroziosum (schreberi), Betuletum (pendulae) vaccinioso (myrtilli)–pleuroziosum (schreberi). The flourishing ones are cenopopularions from the groups Pinetum (sylvestris) pleuroziosum (schreberi), Pinetum (sylvestris) convallarioso (majalis)–pleuroziosum (schreberi), Pinetum (sylvestris) franguloso (alni)–vaccinioso (myrtilli)–pleuroziosum (schreberi), Pinetum (sylvestris) sorboso (aucuparii) –convallarioso (majalis)– pleuroziosum (schreberi).

The belonging to three different vitality types testifies to the different degree of favorableness of one or another location as to the formation and existence of cenopopulation of this specie. Based on the signs of vitality structure, the least favorable are the ecological-cenotic conditions of Pinetum (sylvestris) vaccinioso (myrtilli)–pleuroziosum (schreberi) group, and most favorable – Pinetum (sylvestris) pleuroziosum (schreberi) and Pinetum (sylvestris) franguloso (alni)–vaccinioso (myrtilli)–pleuroziosum (schreberi)

Author Biography

Maryna Sherstiuk, Getmanski National Natural Park Myru str., 6, Trostyanets, Ukraine, 42600

Head of Research Department

References

  1. Sheljag-Sosonko, Ju. R. (2007). Bioriznomanitnist’: paradyhma ta vyznacennja [Biodiversity: paradigm and determination]. Ukr. botan. zurn., 64 (6), 777–796.
  2. Sheljag-Sosonko, Ju. R. (2008). Bioriznomanitnist’: koncepcija, kul’tura ta rol’ nauky [Biodiversity: concept, culture and the role of science]. Ukr. botan. zurn., 65 (1), 3–25.
  3. Malynovs’kyj, K., Caryk, J., Kyjak, V., Nesteruk, Ju. (2002). Ridkisni, endemicni, reliktovi ta pohranycno-areal’ni vydy roslyn Ukraіns’kych Karpat [The rare, endemic, relict and boundary-species areal Ukrainian Carpathians]. Lviv: Liha-Pres, 76.
  4. Stojko, S. M. (2004). Kryteriі ocinky ridkisnosti vydiv [Evaluation criteria rarity of species]. Rarytetnyj fitohenofond zachidnych rehioniv Ukraіny [Rare fitohenofond western regions of Ukraine]. Lviv: Liha-Pres, 57–64.
  5. Ustymenko, P. M., Sheljag-Sosonko, Ju. R., Vakarenko, L. P. (2007). Rarytetnyj fitocenofond Ukraіny [Rare phytocoenotic pool Ukraine]. Kyiv: Fitosociocentr, 270.
  6. Sherbakova, O. F., Barmak, I. M. (2013). Pryncypy ta pidchody do sozolohicnoі katehoryzaciі rarytetnych vydiv Roslyn [Principles and approaches to categorizing sozological rare species]. Pytannja bioindykaciі ta ekolohiі, 18 (1), 101–115.
  7. Popovych, S. Ju. (Ed.) (2011). Dendrosozolohicnyj kataloh pryrodno-zapovidnoho fondu Lisostepu Ukraіny [Dendrosozolohichnyy catalog of natural reserve fund steppes of Ukraine]. Kyiv: Ahrar Media Hrup, 800.
  8. Zlobin, Yu. A. (1989). Printsipyi i metodyi izucheniya tsenoticheskih populyatsiy rasteniy [Principles and methods for the study cenotic populations of plant]. Kazan: Izd-vo Kazanskogo un-ta, 146.
  9. Zlobin, Yu. A. (1989). Teoriya i praktika otsenki vitalitetnogo sostava tsenopopulyatsiy rasteniy [Theory and practice of evaluation of vitality composition of plants cenotic populations]. Botan. zhurn., 74 (6), 769–781.
  10. Zlobin, Yu. A. (2009). Populyatsionnaya ekologiya rasteniy: sovremennoe sostoyanie, tochki rosta [Population ecology of plants: the current state, in terms of growth]. Sumy: Universitetskaya kniga, 263.
  11. Zhilyaev, G. G., Tsarik, Y. V. (1989). Struktura populyatsiy travyanistyih rasteniy v rastitelnyih soobschestvah Karpat [The structure of the herbaceous plant populations in plant communities of the Carpathians]. Botan. zhurn., 74 (1), 88–96.
  12. Luchkiv, N. (2010). Osoblyvosti vikovoі ta vitalitetnoі struktury cenopopuljacij Centaurea carpatica (Porc.) Porc [Features of age and vitality structure of populations Centaurea carpatica (Porc.) Porc]. Visnyk Lviv. un-tu. Serija biolohicna, 52, 36–43.
  13. Caryk, J. V. (2004). Dejaki aspekty vyvcennja vnutrisn’opopuljacijnoho riznomanittja [Some aspects of the study diversity of populations]. Visnyk L’vivs’koho universytetu. Serija Biolohicna, 37, 176–184.
  14. Zyljajev, H. H., Caryk, J. V. (2009). Koncepcija zyttjezdatnosti populjacij [The concept of sustainability populations]. Zyttjezdatnist’ populjacij roslyn vysokohir’ja Karpat [The viability of populations of plants highlands Carpathians]. Lviv: Merkator, 7–17.
  15. Bondarjeva, L. M., Bjelan, S. S. (2010). Porivnjal’nyj analiz vitalitetnoі struktury populjacij cenozoutvorjujucych zlakiv na terytorijach zakaznykiv zaplavy ricky Suly ta na diljankach iz antropohennym vykorystannjam [Comparative analysis of vitality structure of populations tsenozoutvoryuyuchyh cereals on the reserve floodplain rivers Sula and in areas with anthropogenic use]. Visnyk SNAU, 4 (19), 15–21.
  16. Gavrilova, M. N. (2008). Vitalitetnaya struktura tsenopopulyatsiy nekotoryih kustarnikov v raznyih rayonah respubliki Mariy El [Vital structure of populations of some bushes in different regions of the Republic of Mari El]. Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 7 (1), 106–111.
  17. Zlobin, Yu. A., Kirilchuk, K. S. (2005). Populyatsionnaya struktura poymennyih lugovyih fitotsenozov [Population structure of floodplain meadow phytocenoses]. Izv. GGU im. F. Skorinyi, 6 (33), 65–70.
  18. Kashin, A. S., Zhulidova, T. V., Parhomenko, V. M. et. al. (2009). Sostyanie tsenopopulyatsiy Antennaria dioica (L.) Gaerth. v Saratovskoy oblasti [Status tcenopopuljatcij Antennaria dioica (L.) Gaertn. in the Saratov region]. Povolzhskiy ekologicheskiy zhurnal, 3, 195–209.
  19. Skljar, Ju. L. (2002). Rozmirno-vitalitetna riznomanitnist’ populjacij Potamogeton natans L. basejnu Desny [Size-population diversity vitality Potamogeton natans L. basin of the Desna]. Visnyk deržavnoho ahroekolohicnoho universytetu, 1, 67–70.
  20. Skljar, Ju. L. (2003). Populjacijna struktura Nuphar lutea L. (Nymphaeaceae) basejnu r. Desny [Population structure Nuphar lutea L. (Nymphaeaceae) basin of the Desna]. Ukr. botan. Zurn, 60 (2), 175–181.
  21. Thazaplizheva, L. H., Chadaeva, V. A. (2010). Vitalitetnaya struktura tsenopopulyatsiy vidov roda Allium L. v usloviyah Kabardino-Balkarii [Vytaly structure of species populations Genus Allium L. in terms Kabardino-Balkariya]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gos. un-ta, 6 (112), 42–46.
  22. Andrijenko, T. L., Perehrym, M. M. (2012). Oficijni pereliky rehional’no ridkisnych roslyn administratyvnych terytorij Ukraіny (dovidkove vydannja) [Official lists of regionally rare plants administrative territories of Ukraine (reference book)]. Kyiv: Al’terpres, 148.
  23. Pancenko, S. M. (2000). Flora, roslynnist’ ta populjaciі model’nych vydiv Starohuts’koho lisovoho masyvu (Sums’ka oblast’) [Flora, vegetation and population modeling Starogutskiy forest types (Sumy region)]. Kyiv, 19.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-28

How to Cite

Sherstiuk, M. (2017). The analysis of vitality structure of Chimaphila Umbellata (L.) W. Barton CENOpopulations in forest phytocenoses of the novgorod-sivers’k polissia. ScienceRise: Biological Science, (1 (4), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-8025.2017.94019

Issue

No. 1 (4) (2017)

Section

Biological Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Марина Юріївна Шерстюк

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.