Projection of communicative interaction as a component of assessment and control strategies in teaching languages at university

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2017.102899

Keywords:

control and assessment strategy, communicative interaction, projection, perceptive type of activity

Abstract

In the article are demonstrated the results of the study of conditions and possibilities of realization of the project of communicative interaction between students and teachers in the strategy of control and assessment of teaching language. The conclusion was made that the neglect of projection of communicative algorithms and procedures results in the incomplete taking into account of factors of qualitative and correct final exam on language. That is why the possibilities of feedback of study participants, language cognition, experience of speaking in communicative situations, initiative dialog and language partnership are lost. The author assumes that the projection of communicative interaction in the control and assessment strategy essentially and positively influences the check-up and development of language knowledge and speaking skills of students at an exam. The main observation was realized with the involvement of students of engineer and philological specialties of Ukrainian universities, who pass exams in English. It was elucidated that a condition of a successful exam is changes and correction of the perceptive image of communicative interaction between students and teachers at the final control. Statements about necessary changes in the project of communication between a teacher and a student became a conclusion of the research. These changes relate to: features and role of a question at an exam, put by a teacher to a student and vice versa; speaking roles and stereotype genres of teacher’s and student’s speaking; initiative in a dialog; mistakes in speaking at a speaking exam. The author of this article offers the bloc of operations for the activity project that positively influence the perceptive image of an exam in teachers and students. The correct perceptive image of an exam gives a possibility to create communicative situations of the full value communication between teachers and students. Speaking in these situations must become an object of the final control of language knowledge and speaking skills and enrich the experience of participants of an exam by new models of communicative interaction

Author Biography

Olesia Liubashenko, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Volodymyrska str., 60, Kyiv, Ukraine, 01033

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor

Department of Methods of teaching Ukrainian and foreign languages and literature

Institute of Philology

References

  1. D’yachenko, V. K. (2001). Novaya dydaktyka. Moscow: Narodnoe obrazovanye, 496.
  2. Liubashenko, O. (2007). Linguodydaktychni strategii priektuvannya protsesu navchannya ukrayinskoyi movy u vyshchiy shkoli [Linguodidactic strategy: framing process of learning the Ukrainian language in high school]. Nizhin: Aspekt-Poligraf, 296.
  3. Mandl, H., Friedrich, H. F. (Eds.) (2006). Handbuch Lernstrategien. Gottingen: Hogrefe, 414.
  4. Griffiths, C. (2013). The Strategy Factor in Successful Language Learning. Bristol: Mutilingual Matters, 240.
  5. Oxford, R. (2011). Teaching and Researching Language Learning Strategies. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited. doi: 10.4324/9781315838816
  6. Orlovskaya, I. S. Lichnostno-deyatelnostnaya strategiya obucheniya inostrannomu yazyku.
  7. Shchukin, A. N. (2010). Sovremennyye intensivnyye metody i tekhnologii obucheniya inostrannym yazykam. Moscow: Filomatis, 188.
  8. Pentyliuk, M. I. (2011). Aktualni problemy suchasnoi linhvodydaktyky. Kyiv: Lenvit, 256.
  9. Alderson, J. C., Banerjee, J. (2001). Language testing and assessment (Part I). Language Teaching, 34 (4), 213–236. doi: 10.1017/s0261444800014464
  10. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 240.
  11. Green, A. (2014). Exploring Language Assessment and Testing: Language in Action. New York: Routledge, 272.
  12. Petrashchuk, O. (1999). Testovyi kontrol' u navchanni inozemnoyi movy v seredniy zahal'noosvitniy shkoli [Testing control in foreign languages teaching at school]. Kyiv: Vydavnychyy tsentr KDLU, 261.
  13. Kvasova, O. G. (2009). Osnovy testuvannya inshomovnykh navychok i vmin' [Basis of Testing of foreign skills]. Kyiv: Lenvit, 119.
  14. Pavlova, T. P. (2006). Kompleksne testuvannia yak faktor modernizatsii navchannia inozemnyh mov. Problemy suchasnoyi pedagogichnoyi osvity, 11 (2), 206–214.
  15. Brookhart, S. M. (2008). How to Give Effective Feedback to Your Students. Alexandria.
  16. Skurativska, M. O. (2009). Suchasni metody na tehnologii vykladannia mov u vyshchii shkoli Ukrayiny. Available at: http://intkonf.org/skurativska-mo-suchasni-metodi-ta-tehnologiyi-vikladannya-inozemnih-mov-u-vischiy-shkoli-ukrayini/
  17. Vashchuk, F. G. (2011). Integratsia v Evropeiskii osvitnii prostir: zdobutky, problemy, perspektyvy. Uzhhorod: ZakDu, 560.
  18. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment (2016). Strasbourg: Language Policy Unit, 260. Available at: https://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf
  19. Murav'eva, G. E. (2002). Teoreticheskie osnovy proektirovaniya obrazovatel'nyh processov v shkole. Moscow: Prometey, 200.
  20. Stazicker, J. (Ed.) (2015). The Structure of Perceptual Experience. West Sussex: Wiley, 154. doi: 10.1002/9781119061113
  21. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press, 340. doi: 10.1037/10037-000

Published

2017-05-31

How to Cite

Liubashenko, O. (2017). Projection of communicative interaction as a component of assessment and control strategies in teaching languages at university. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, (5 (13), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2017.102899

Issue

Section

Pedagogical Education