Features of education of dignity in junior schoolchildren

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2021.232389

Keywords:

education, dignity, junior school students, personality, age, moral experience, methods

Abstract

The article is devoted to the topical problem of educating dignity in junior schoolchildren. Based on the analysis of philosophical psychological and pedagogical literature, generalization of the obtained empirical data, use of pedagogical diagnostics, the basic tendencies and features of education of dignity at younger schoolchildren are revealed, criteria (cognitive, emotional-value, active) are defined with the corresponding indicators, which allowed to characterize dignity in junior school students (high, medium, low). Students' understanding of the concept of "human dignity", the peculiarities of its upbringing and behavioral manifestations is considered.

The practical significance of the study is determined by the fact that its results allow to improve the quality of the educational space of the school, to increase the effectiveness of its impact on the moral and ethical development of the younger generation, to adapt the activities of junior students to real life. The defined age features of students of grades 1-4 allow to provide a qualitatively new educational effect in solving the problems of moral education of schoolchildren, features of influence of pedagogical and educational systems on formation and development of the person are considered. Various approaches to determining the essence of moral value – dignity and factors of its successful formation, which have gained recognition in foreign pedagogical thought and spread in educational practice, are analyzed. The article reveals the state of formation of dignity in junior schoolchildren at the ascertaining stage of scientific research.

The practical significance of the article is that its materials can be used in the organization of educational work of general education institutions and training of primary school teachers

Author Biography

Olga Tretyak, Borys Hrinchenko Kyiv University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Preschool and Primary Education

Institute of Postgraduate Education

References

  1. Kant, I. (2000). Krytyka chystoho rozumu. Kyiv: Universytet.
  2. Kremen, V. Kh. (2010). Filosofiia liudotsentryzmu v osvitnomu prostori. Kyiv: Tovarystvo «Znannia» Ukrainy.
  3. Staffen, M. R., Arshakyan, M. (2017). About the principle of dignity: philosophical foundations and legal aspects. Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos, 38 (75), 43. doi: http://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p43
  4. Ruget Sound ESD-excellence & equity in education Pre-K-12 Life Skills Curriculum Guide presd.org. (2015). Washington: Center for Change in Transition Services; Seattle: University.
  5. Zhurba, K. O., Konovets, S. V., Shkilna, I. M. (2016). Osobystisno oriientovana metodyka vykhovannia moralnoi samosvidomosti zrostaiuchoi osobystosti. Kharkiv: «Drukarnia Madryd», 176.
  6. Pro skhvalennia Kontseptsii realizatsii derzhavnoi polityky u sferi reformuvannia zahalnoi serednoi osvity “Nova ukrainska shkola” na period do 2029 roku (2016). Nakazy KM Ukrainy No. 988-r. 14.06.2016. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/988-
  7. Bekh, I. D., Aliksiienko, T. F., Zhurba, K. O., Kyrylenko, S. V., Kyrychenko, S. V., Koretska, I. V., Ostapenko, O. I. et. al. (2019). Prohrama «Nova ukrainska shkola u postupi do tsinnostei». Kyiv, 40.
  8. Bekh, I. D. (2012). Osobystist u prostori dukhovnoho rozvytku. Kyiv: Akademvydav, 256.
  9. Bekh, I. D. (2014). Innovative educational technology: essential terms and ways of realization. Pedahohika i psykholohiia, 1, 12–17.
  10. Nieuważny, J., Nowakowski, K., Ptaszyński, M., Masui, F., Rzepka, R., Araki, K. (2021). Does change in ethical education influence core moral values? Towards history- and culture-aware morality model with application in automatic moral reasoning. Cognitive Systems Research, 66, 89–99. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2020.10.011
  11. Bajovic, M., Rizzo, K. (2020). Meta-moral cognition: bridging the gap among adolescents’ moral thinking, moral emotions and moral actions. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 26 (1), 1–11. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2020.1867206
  12. Fowers, B. J. (2021). Introduction to the special issue: Research in morality as an integrated, interdisciplinary domain of inquiry. Journal of Moral Education, 1–8. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2020.1868415
  13. Mesquita, A. M. (2020). Value formation on concrete subject educational process. Interacao em Psicologia, 24 (3), 375–384. doi: http://doi.org/10.5380/riep.v24i3.72853
  14. Aldridge, D. (2019). The Moral Contract, Sympathy and Becoming Human: A Response to Michael Hand's A Theory of Moral Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 53 (4), 636–641. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12394
  15. Willemse, T. M., Thompson, I., Vanderlinde, R., Mutton, T. (2018). Family-school partnerships: a challenge for teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44 (3), 252–257. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2018.1465545
  16. Marin, D. C., Bocos, M., Calin, C. V. (2018). Effektive mtthods of strengthening the school-family partnership during the preparatory grade. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS, XLI, 101–107. doi: http://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.06.12
  17. Zhurba, K. O. (2018). Smyslozhyttievi tsinnosti shchkoliariv osnovnoi i starshoi shkoly: teoretyko-metodychnyi aspekt. Dnipro: Seredniak T. K., 496.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-31

How to Cite

Tretyak, O. (2021). Features of education of dignity in junior schoolchildren. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, (3(42), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2021.232389

Issue

No. 3(42) (2021)

Section

Pedagogical Education

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Olga Tretyak

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.