The use of combined method in skin tumors treatment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4798.2018.137745Keywords:
treatment of tumors of the skin, combined method, radio wave method, surgical methodAbstract
We propose to consider a combined method of removing skin tumors, based on a combination of radio wave method and cryodestruction. We have studied the effectiveness of its use in the treatment of individual tumors of the skin. The results were analyzed at 3, 6 and 12 months after the removal of tumors. The aim of the work was to compare radio-wave and surgical methods with a combined method of removing skin tumors and their long-term results.
Materials and methods. For the study, patients with previous diagnoses of melanocytic naevus (MN), seborrheic keratosis (SK), skin cancer (SC) and melanoma of the skin (MS) were selected. All patients, depending on the indications, were recommended to conduct a diagnostic biopsy. During the diagnostic biopsy, the following methods were used: radio wave, combined (radio wave method with cryodestruction of the basis), surgical.
Results. According to the results of the review at 3, 6, 12 months after removal, the presence of relapse of tumors, formation of hypertrophic, keloid, normotrophic scars was evaluated. After the removal of tumors, the combined method of recurrence of tumors was observed at 3.3%. The formation of keloid scars after the combined removal method was 3.4% during 12 months of observation compared with the radio wave method (7.7%) and surgical (11.4%). Hypertrophic scars were observed in 3.4% after the combined method and 7.4% after radio wavelength removal. The highest number of normotrophic scarring was observed after the combined removal method (89.9%) compared with radio wave (76.9%) and surgical methods (88.9%).
Conclusions. After the use of combined method, healing of wound lasted the longest in comparison with the radio wave method and surgical. The formation of pathological types of scarring was observed less frequently after the combined method of removal than after radio waves and surgical methods. Relapses of the SC after the combined withdrawal method were observed less frequently, compared with the literature data about other methods of removal
References
- Menesi, W., Buchel, E. W., Hayakawa, T. J. (2014). A reliable frozen section technique for basal cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Plastic Surgery, 22 (3), 179–182. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/229255031402200301
- Ogawa, R. (2017). Keloid and Hypertrophic Scars Are the Result of Chronic Inflammation in the Reticular Dermis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18 (3), 606. doi: http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18030606
- Yun, M. J., Park, J. U., Kwon, S. T. (2013). Surgical Options for Malignant Skin Tumors of the Hand. Archives of Plastic Surgery, 40 (3), 238–243. doi: http://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2013.40.3.238
- Ogawa, R., Akaishi, S., Kuribayashi, S., Miyashita, T. (2016). Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars Can Now Be Cured Completely: Recent Progress in Our Understanding of the Pathogenesis of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars and the Most Promising Current Therapeutic Strategy. Journal of Nippon Medical School, 83 (2), 46–53. doi: http://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.83.46
- Cheng, H. (2012). Risks and complications of skin surgery. Available at: https://www.dermnetnz.org/topics/risks-and-complications-of-skin-surgery/
- Poetschke, J., Gauglitz, G. G. (2016). Current options for the treatment of pathological scarring. JDDG: Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft, 14 (5), 467–477. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.13027
- Potenza, C., Bernardini, N., Balduzzi, V., Losco, L., Mambrin, A., Marchesiello, A. et. al. (2018). A Review of the Literature of Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatments of Invasive Squamous Cells Carcinoma. BioMed Research International, 2018, 1–9. doi: http://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9489163
- Sartore, L., Lancerotto, L., Salmaso, M., Giatsidis, G., Paccagnella, O., Alaibac, M., Bassetto, F. (2011). Facial basal cell carcinoma: analysis of recurrence and follow-up strategies. Oncology Reports, 26 (6), 1423–1429. doi: http://doi.org/10.3892/or.2011.1453
- Jeon, H., Wang, Y., Smart, C. (2015). What is the best method for removing biopsy-proven atypical nevi? A comparison of margin clearance rates between reshave and full-thickness surgical excisions. Dermatologic Surgery, 41 (9), 1020–1023. doi: http://doi.org/10.1097/dss.0000000000000437
- Blum, A., Hofmann-Wellenhof, R., Marghoob, A. A., Argenziano, G., Cabo, H., Carrera, C. et. al. (2014). Recurrent Melanocytic Nevi and Melanomas in Dermoscopy. JAMA Dermatology, 150 (2), 138–145. doi: http://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6908
- Saaiq M., Zaib S., Ahmad S. (2012). Electrocautery burns: experience with three cases and review of literature. Ann Burns Fire Disasters, 25 (4), 203–206.
- Emanuel, G. (2012). Cryosurgery. Dermatology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Limited, 138, 2283–2289.
- Mirza, F. N., Khatri, K. A. (2017). The use of lasers in the treatment of skin cancer: A review. Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy, 19 (8), 451–458. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2017.1349321
- Castagna, R. D., Stramari, J. M., Chemello, R. M. L. (2017). The recurrent nevus phenomenon. Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, 92 (4), 531–533. doi: http://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20176190
- Kaliyadan, F., Venkitakrishnan, S. (2009). Teledermatology: Clinical case profiles and practical issues. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, 75 (1), 32–35. doi: http://doi.org/10.4103/0378-6323.45217
- Nelson, C. A., Takeshita, J., Wanat, K. A., Bream, K. D. W., Holmes, J. H., Koenig, H. C. et. al. (2016). Impact of store-and-forward (SAF) teledermatology on outpatient dermatologic care: A prospective study in an underserved urban primary care setting. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 74 (3), 484–490. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.09.058
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Kira Kravets, Zhanna Dranyk, Olga Vasylenko, Olga Bogomolets
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.