The use of combined method in skin tumors treatment

Authors

  • Kira Kravets Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education Amosova str., 58, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61176, Ukraine
  • Zhanna Dranyk Dr. Bogomolets’ Institute of Dermatocosmetology Schevchenko blvd., 17, Kyiv, Ukraine, 01030, Ukraine
  • Olga Vasylenko Dr. Bogomolets’ Institute of Dermatocosmetology Schevchenko blvd., 17, Kyiv, Ukraine, 01030, Ukraine
  • Olga Bogomolets Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education Amosova str., 58, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61176, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4798.2018.137745

Keywords:

treatment of tumors of the skin, combined method, radio wave method, surgical method

Abstract

We propose to consider a combined method of removing skin tumors, based on a combination of radio wave method and cryodestruction. We have studied the effectiveness of its use in the treatment of individual tumors of the skin. The results were analyzed at 3, 6 and 12 months after the removal of tumors. The aim of the work was to compare radio-wave and surgical methods with a combined method of removing skin tumors and their long-term results.

Materials and methods. For the study, patients with previous diagnoses of melanocytic naevus (MN), seborrheic keratosis (SK), skin cancer (SC) and melanoma of the skin (MS) were selected. All patients, depending on the indications, were recommended to conduct a diagnostic biopsy. During the diagnostic biopsy, the following methods were used: radio wave, combined (radio wave method with cryodestruction of the basis), surgical.

Results. According to the results of the review at 3, 6, 12 months after removal, the presence of relapse of tumors, formation of hypertrophic, keloid, normotrophic scars was evaluated. After the removal of tumors, the combined method of recurrence of tumors was observed at 3.3%. The formation of keloid scars after the combined removal method was 3.4% during 12 months of observation compared with the radio wave method (7.7%) and surgical (11.4%). Hypertrophic scars were observed in 3.4% after the combined method and 7.4% after radio wavelength removal. The highest number of normotrophic scarring was observed after the combined removal method (89.9%) compared with radio wave (76.9%) and surgical methods (88.9%).

Conclusions. After the use of combined method, healing of wound lasted the longest in comparison with the radio wave method and surgical. The formation of pathological types of scarring was observed less frequently after the combined method of removal than after radio waves and surgical methods. Relapses of the SC after the combined withdrawal method were observed less frequently, compared with the literature data about other methods of removal

Author Biographies

Kira Kravets, Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education Amosova str., 58, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61176

Postgraduate student

Department of Dermatovenereology and HIV / AIDS

Zhanna Dranyk, Dr. Bogomolets’ Institute of Dermatocosmetology Schevchenko blvd., 17, Kyiv, Ukraine, 01030

Surgeon

Olga Vasylenko, Dr. Bogomolets’ Institute of Dermatocosmetology Schevchenko blvd., 17, Kyiv, Ukraine, 01030

Surgeon

Olga Bogomolets, Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education Amosova str., 58, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61176

MD, Professor

Dermatovenerology and HIV/AIDS Department

References

  1. Menesi, W., Buchel, E. W., Hayakawa, T. J. (2014). A reliable frozen section technique for basal cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Plastic Surgery, 22 (3), 179–182. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/229255031402200301
  2. Ogawa, R. (2017). Keloid and Hypertrophic Scars Are the Result of Chronic Inflammation in the Reticular Dermis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18 (3), 606. doi: http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18030606
  3. Yun, M. J., Park, J. U., Kwon, S. T. (2013). Surgical Options for Malignant Skin Tumors of the Hand. Archives of Plastic Surgery, 40 (3), 238–243. doi: http://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2013.40.3.238
  4. Ogawa, R., Akaishi, S., Kuribayashi, S., Miyashita, T. (2016). Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars Can Now Be Cured Completely: Recent Progress in Our Understanding of the Pathogenesis of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars and the Most Promising Current Therapeutic Strategy. Journal of Nippon Medical School, 83 (2), 46–53. doi: http://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.83.46
  5. Cheng, H. (2012). Risks and complications of skin surgery. Available at: https://www.dermnetnz.org/topics/risks-and-complications-of-skin-surgery/
  6. Poetschke, J., Gauglitz, G. G. (2016). Current options for the treatment of pathological scarring. JDDG: Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft, 14 (5), 467–477. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.13027
  7. Potenza, C., Bernardini, N., Balduzzi, V., Losco, L., Mambrin, A., Marchesiello, A. et. al. (2018). A Review of the Literature of Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatments of Invasive Squamous Cells Carcinoma. BioMed Research International, 2018, 1–9. doi: http://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9489163
  8. Sartore, L., Lancerotto, L., Salmaso, M., Giatsidis, G., Paccagnella, O., Alaibac, M., Bassetto, F. (2011). Facial basal cell carcinoma: analysis of recurrence and follow-up strategies. Oncology Reports, 26 (6), 1423–1429. doi: http://doi.org/10.3892/or.2011.1453
  9. Jeon, H., Wang, Y., Smart, C. (2015). What is the best method for removing biopsy-proven atypical nevi? A comparison of margin clearance rates between reshave and full-thickness surgical excisions. Dermatologic Surgery, 41 (9), 1020–1023. doi: http://doi.org/10.1097/dss.0000000000000437
  10. Blum, A., Hofmann-Wellenhof, R., Marghoob, A. A., Argenziano, G., Cabo, H., Carrera, C. et. al. (2014). Recurrent Melanocytic Nevi and Melanomas in Dermoscopy. JAMA Dermatology, 150 (2), 138–145. doi: http://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6908
  11. Saaiq M., Zaib S., Ahmad S. (2012). Electrocautery burns: experience with three cases and review of literature. Ann Burns Fire Disasters, 25 (4), 203–206.
  12. Emanuel, G. (2012). Cryosurgery. Dermatology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Limited, 138, 2283–2289.
  13. Mirza, F. N., Khatri, K. A. (2017). The use of lasers in the treatment of skin cancer: A review. Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy, 19 (8), 451–458. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2017.1349321
  14. Castagna, R. D., Stramari, J. M., Chemello, R. M. L. (2017). The recurrent nevus phenomenon. Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, 92 (4), 531–533. doi: http://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20176190
  15. Kaliyadan, F., Venkitakrishnan, S. (2009). Teledermatology: Clinical case profiles and practical issues. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, 75 (1), 32–35. doi: http://doi.org/10.4103/0378-6323.45217
  16. Nelson, C. A., Takeshita, J., Wanat, K. A., Bream, K. D. W., Holmes, J. H., Koenig, H. C. et. al. (2016). Impact of store-and-forward (SAF) teledermatology on outpatient dermatologic care: A prospective study in an underserved urban primary care setting. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 74 (3), 484–490. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.09.058

Published

2018-07-19

How to Cite

Kravets, K., Dranyk, Z., Vasylenko, O., & Bogomolets, O. (2018). The use of combined method in skin tumors treatment. ScienceRise: Medical Science, (5 (25), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4798.2018.137745

Issue

Section

Medical Science