The impact of duration of the period of home blood pressure assessment on antihypertensive treatment efficiency in real clinical practice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4798.2016.80467

Keywords:

arterial hypertension, arterial pressure, home arterial pressure antihypertensive treatment

Abstract

Aim. The assessment of diagnostic possibilities of protocols of home arterial pressure (AP) measuring of different duration for the control of antihypertensive therapy efficacy.

Methods. The data of home AP of 236 patients as to its value, frequency of attaining the recommended level and phenotype of arterial hypertension (AH) for 3–5–7 days of measuring were compared. The coefficients of Cohen’s kappa and Leen’s correlation coordination were studied.

Results. The coordination of mean AP values with the data of 7-days measuring was worsened most essentially at the reduction of measuring period to 3 days. The determination of home AP, according to the data of 5-days measuring comparing with 5-days one has no essential impact on the assessment of antihypertensive therapy efficacy as to the attainment of recommended level and establishing of AH phenotypes but worsens it at 3-days one.

Conclusion. The reduction of the period of home AP measuring from 7 to 3 and 5 days can influence the values of CAT and HAT at the beginning of treatment and in the case of 3 days period it can influence the diagnostic possibilities as to the efficacy control of antihypertensive therapy

Author Biographies

Катерина Миколаївна Амосова, Bogomolets National Medical University T. Shevchenko blvd., 13, Kyiv, Ukraine, 01601

Doctor of Medical Sciences, professor, Corresponding Member of National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, rector

Department of Internal Medicine № 2

Юлія Володимирівна Руденко, Bogomolets National Medical University T. Shevchenko blvd., 13, Kyiv, Ukraine, 01601

PhD, associate professor

Department of Internal Medicine № 2

References

  1. Rahimi, K., Emdin, C. A., MacMahon, S. (2015). The Epidemiology of Blood Pressure and Its Worldwide Management. Circulation Research, 116 (6), 925–936. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.116.304723
  2. Kovalenko, V. M., Kornac'kiy, V. M. (Eds.) (2014). Hvoroby systemy krovoobigu jak medyko-social'na i suspil'no-politychna problema. Kyiv, 115.
  3. Mancia, G., Fagard, R., Narkiewicz, K., Redón, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M. et. al. (2013). 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Journal of Hypertension, 31 (7), 1281–1357. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc
  4. Parati, G., Stergiou, G. S., Asmar, R., Bilo, G., de Leeuw, P., Imai, Y. et. al. (2008). European Society of Hypertension guidelines for blood pressure monitoring at home: a summary report of the Second International Consensus Conference on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring. Journal of Hypertension, 26 (8), 1505–1526. doi: 10.1097/hjh.0b013e328308da66
  5. Pickering, T. G., Miller, N. H., Ogedegbe, G., Krakoff, L. R., Artinian, N. T., Goff, D. (2008). Call to Action on Use and Reimbursement for Home Blood Pressure Monitoring: A Joint Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, American Society of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association. Hypertension, 52 (1), 10–29. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.107.189010
  6. Stergiou, G. S., Bliziotis, I. A. (2011). Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertension: A Systematic Review. American Journal of Hypertension, 24 (2), 123–134. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2010.194
  7. Stergiou, G. S., Asayama, K., Thijs, L., Kollias, A., Niiranen, T. J., Hozawa, A. et. al. (2014). Prognosis of White-Coat and Masked HypertensionNovelty and Significance. Hypertension, 63 (4), 675–682. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.113.02741
  8. Ward, A. M., Takahashi, O., Stevens, R., Heneghan, C. (2012). Home measurement of blood pressure and cardiovascular disease. Journal of Hypertension, 30 (3), 449–456. doi: 10.1097/hjh.0b013e32834e4aed
  9. Glynn, L. G., Murphy, A. W., Smith, S. M., Schroeder, K., Fahey, T. (2010). Interventions used to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd005182.pub4
  10. Stergiou, G. S., Ntineri, A. (2015). The optimal schedule for self-home blood pressure monitoring. Journal of Hypertension, 33 (4), 693–697. doi: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000000509
  11. Stergiou, G. S., Parati, G., Vlachopoulos, C., Achimastos, A., Andreadis, E., Asmar, R. et. al. (2016). Methodology and technology for peripheral and central blood pressure and blood pressure variability measurement. Journal of Hypertension, 34 (9), 1665–1677. doi: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000000969
  12. Amosova, K. M., Rudenko, Ju. V., Rokyta, O. I., Kacytadze, I. Ju. (2014). Efektyvnist' unifikovanogo pokrokovogo algorytmu likuvannja dlja zabezpechennja kontrolju arterial'nogo tysku u hvoryh z arterial'noju gipertenzijeju v ambulatornij praktyci: rezul'taty doslidzhennja PERFEKT. Serce i sudyny, 1, 34–46.
  13. Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20 (1), 37–46. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104
  14. McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 276–282. doi: 10.11613/bm.2012.031
  15. Lin, L. I.-K. (1989). A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility. Biometrics, 45 (1), 255. doi: 10.2307/2532051
  16. McBride, G. B. (2005). A Proposal for Strength-of-Agreement Criteria for Lin’S Concordance Correlation Coefficient. NIWA Client Report: HAM2005-062. Available at: http://www.medcalc.org/download/pdf/McBride2005.pdf
  17. Kottner, J., Audigé, L., Brorson, S., Donner, A., Gajewski, B. J., Hróbjartsson, A. et. al. (2011). Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64 (1), 96–106. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002
  18. Niiranen, T. J., Johansson, J. K., Reunanen, A., Jula, A. M. (2011). Optimal Schedule for Home Blood Pressure Measurement Based on Prognostic Data: The Finn-Home Study. Hypertension, 57 (6), 1081–1086. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.110.162123
  19. Martins, W. P., Nastri, C. O. (2014). Interpreting reproducibility results for ultrasound measurements. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 43 (4), 479–480. doi: 10.1002/uog.13320
  20. Ohkubo, T., Asayama, K., Kikuya, M., Metoki, H., Hoshi, H., Hashimoto, J. et. al. (2004). How many times should blood pressure be measured at home for better prediction of stroke risk? Ten-year follow-up results from the Ohasama study. Journal of Hypertension, 22 (6), 1099–1104. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200406000-00009
  21. Kim, J., Lee, M. Y., Kim, J., Namgung, J., Lee, S. Y., Cho, D. K. et. al. (2015). Optimal duration of home blood pressure measurements for the diagnosis of arterial hypertension: a prospective multicenter study. Journal of Hypertension, 33, e37. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000467447.76482.cd
  22. Nunan, D., Thompson, M., Heneghan, C. J., Perera, R., McManus, R. J., Ward, A. (2015). Accuracy of self-monitored blood pressure for diagnosing hypertension in primary care. Journal of Hypertension, 33 (4), 755–762. doi: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000000489
  23. Ntineri, A., Nasothimiou, E., Kollias, A., Roussias, L., Achimastos, A., Stergiou, G. S. (2015). Diagnostic agreement of the european society of hypertension home blood monitoring schedule with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in untreated and treated subjects. Journal of Hypertension, 33, e38. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000467449.84105.d0
  24. Hänninen, M.-R. A., Niiranen, T. J., Puukka, P. J., Jula, A. M. (2010). Comparison of home and ambulatory blood pressure measurement in the diagnosis of masked hypertension. Journal of Hypertension, 28 (4), 709–714. doi: 10.1097/hjh.0b013e3283369faa

Downloads

Published

2016-10-31

How to Cite

Амосова, К. М., & Руденко, Ю. В. (2016). The impact of duration of the period of home blood pressure assessment on antihypertensive treatment efficiency in real clinical practice. ScienceRise: Medical Science, (10 (6), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4798.2016.80467

Issue

No. 10 (6) (2016)

Section

Medical Science

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Катерина Миколаївна Амосова, Юлія Володимирівна Руденко

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.