Improvement of economic and information mechanisms of social-economic development of mountain territories

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.129119

Keywords:

mountain territories, economic mechanism, information mechanism, socio-economic development, public administration, cluster, model

Abstract

The object of research is the socio-economic development of the mountain territories of the Carpathian region (Ukraine). One of the most problematic places is the existing mechanisms of state management to address the problems of mountain territories. Limited resources, insufficient information need to strengthen the attention of local executive bodies and local self-government, as well as further improve existing instruments of state regulation. The following research methods are used: analysis, extrapolation, SWOT analysis and systemic generalization.

In the course of the study, an analysis of the socio-economic development of mountain territories was made. This helped determine the priority industry, namely tourist and recreational. A model of a tourist-recreational cluster is proposed. This will allow creating conditions for effective activity and cooperation of all business entities. In particular, it will contribute to the development and implementation of measures to stabilize and improve the demographic situation in mountain territories, and to reduce the scale of emigration of local residents.

Effective mechanisms for the development of the mountain territories of the Carpathian region, namely, a mechanism for monitoring and forecasting factors, mechanisms for implementing state mining policy, mechanisms for influencing the effective use of available resources are determined. This will ensure the harmonization of the interests of all economic entities and will contribute to the growth of the economic potential of the mountain territories of Ukraine.

The economic and information mechanisms of state management of the socio-economic development of mountain territories are improved, in which, in addition to the steps for each of these mechanisms, specific actions are indicated. That is, their orientation, security, as well as the final goal and conditions of implementation are given.

Thanks to the proposed economic and information mechanisms, the peculiarities of the Carpathian region will be taken into account. Mechanisms contribute to the development of sectoral clustering, the introduction of innovative technologies, taking into account environmental security, the development of the region's infrastructure, increasing employment, social protection of the population and the popularization of the Carpathian region, both inside and outside Ukraine. The essence of the relationship between these mechanisms lies in the fact that the state should regulate those spheres and processes to which the market affects insufficiently or little effectively. This will guarantee the effective development of mountain territories.

Author Biographies

Myroslav Kryshtanovych, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 12, S. Bandera str., Lviv, Ukraine, 79013

Doctor of Science in Public Administration, Professor

Department of Pedagogy and Social Management

Volodymyr Kholiavka, Lviv State University of Physical Culture, 11, T. Kostiushko str., Lviv, Ukraine, 79000

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Economics, Management and Hotel and Restaurant Business

Svitlana Kryshtanovych, Lviv State University of Physical Culture, 11, T. Kostiushko str., Lviv, Ukraine, 79000

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Economics, Management and Hotel and Restaurant Business

Ivan Gul, Lviv State University of Physical Culture, 11, T. Kostiushko str., Lviv, Ukraine, 79000

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Economics, Management and Hotel and Restaurant Business

References

  1. Matviishyn, Ye. H. (2009). Napriamy derzhavnoi pidtrymky rozvytku vidstalykh i depresyvnykh terytorii: zarubizhnyi dosvid. Demokratychne vriaduvannia v konteksti hlobalnykh vyklykiv ta kryzovykh sytuatsii. Lviv: LRIDU NADU, 48‒51.
  2. Lundgren, T. (2005). The determinants of economic growth in the Swedish mountain region–the role of the forest and tourism sector, and protected land. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228455341_The_determinants_of_economic_growth_in_the_Swedish_mountain_region-the_role_of_the_forest_and_tourism_sector_and_protected_land
  3. Dukov, D. F. (2015). Analiz sutnosti poniattia «mekhanizm derzhavnoho upravlinnia» ta pobudova yoho uzahalnenoho vyznachennia. Publichne upravlinnia: stratehiia reform 2020. Kharkiv: KharRI NADU «Mahistr», 77–79. Available at: http://www.kbuapa.kharkov.ua/e-book/apdu/2015-1/doc/1/05.pdf
  4. Yeroshkina, O. O. (2009). Biudzhetnyi mekhanizm rozvytku depresyvnykh rehioniv. Derzhava ta rehiony. Seriia: Derzhavne upravlinnia, 4, 111–115.
  5. Porter, M. (1998). Clusters and the New Economies of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 11–12, 77‒90.
  6. Deili, H. (2002). Poza zrostanniam. Ekonomichna teoriia staloho rozvytku. Kyiv: Intelsfera, 312.
  7. Stratehiia rozvytku hirskykh terytorii lvivskoi oblasti na 2018–2022 roky. (2017). Lviv, 96. Available at: http://sts-rrada.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Strategiya-rozvytku-girs'kyh-terytoriy-1.pdf
  8. Krainyk, O., Bil, M. (2009). Turystychnyi klaster rehionu yak forma sotsialnoho dialohu: upravlinskyi aspekt. Demokratychne vriaduvannia, 4. Available at: http://tourlib.net/statti_ukr/krajnyk.htm
  9. Pietrzyk, I. (2000). Regionalna polityka UE. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN SA, 311.
  10. Beni, M. C. (2003). Globalizacao do Turismo: Megatendencias do Sectore a Realidade Brasileira. Sao Paulo: Editora Aleph, 180.
  11. Shandova, N. (2017). Investigation of organizational and management specifics of health tourism development. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 3 (5 (35)), 4–8. doi:10.15587/2312-8372.2017.100915
  12. Dushko, N. H.; Bobrovska, O. Yu. (Ed.). (2010). Derzhavno-pryvatne partnerstvo yak perspektyvnyi instrument sotsialno-ekonomichnoho rozvytku terytorii. Stalyi rozvytok terytorii: problemy ta shliakhy vyrishennia. Dnipropetrovsk: DRIDU NADU, 51–53.
  13. Sillence, G. (2009). Gothenburg Symposium on Tourism and Travel in the Green Economy Final Report. ETC, 14.
  14. Shkarupa, O. V. (2015). Management of region’s social and economic development environmental modernization. Economic Annals-XXI, 7–8 (2), 57–60.
  15. Melnykovych, M., Nijnik, M., Soloviy, I., Nijnik, A., Sarkki, S., Bihun, Y. (2018). Social-ecological innovation in remote mountain areas: Adaptive responses of forest-dependent communities to the challenges of a changing world. Science of The Total Environment, 613–614, 894–906. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.065
  16. Keeton, W. S., Angelstam, P. K., Bihun, Y., Chernyavskyy, M., Crow, S. M., Deyneka, A. et al. (2013). Sustainable Forest Management Alternatives for the Carpathian Mountains with a Focus on Ukraine. The Carpathians: Integrating Nature and Society Towards Sustainability. Environmental Science and Engineering. Berlin: Springer, 331–352. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12725-0_24
  17. Angelstam, P., Roberge, J.-M., Axelsson, R., Elbakidze, M., Bergman, K.-O., Dahlberg, A. et al. (2013). Evidence-Based Knowledge Versus Negotiated Indicators for Assessment of Ecological Sustainability: The Swedish Forest Stewardship Council Standard as a Case Study. AMBIO, 42 (2), 229–240. doi:10.1007/s13280-012-0377-z
  18. Schubert, U., Stormer, E. (Eds.). (2007). Sustainable development in Europe: concepts, evaluation and applications. Edward Elgar Publishing, 340. doi:10.4337/9781781007587

Downloads

Published

2017-12-28

How to Cite

Kryshtanovych, M., Kholiavka, V., Kryshtanovych, S., & Gul, I. (2017). Improvement of economic and information mechanisms of social-economic development of mountain territories. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 2(5(40), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.129119

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 5(40) (2018): Macroeconomics

Section

Development of Productive Forces and Regional Economy: Original Research

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Myroslav Kryshtanovych, Volodymyr Kholiavka, Svitlana Kryshtanovych, Ivan Gul

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.