The analysis of methodical approaches of the risk assessment organization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.135482Keywords:
risk assessment, quantitative and qualitative analysis methods, choice of risk assessment method, result of risk assessmentAbstract
The object of research is methods of approach to risk assessment, each organization independently develops and implements. The author provides practically gained experience in an international company – an effective approach in the use of risk assessment methods.
One of the most problematic places is the choice of the method of assessing the organization's risks. The method is in primarily in the compatibility of the mission and the objectives of the organization, and a number of tasks with the selected methods of risk assessment. For a quantitative method of risk assessment, it is the availability of correctly calculated norms, according to which a risk analysis will be carried out. For a qualitative method of risk assessment, it is the availability of qualified experts with sufficient experience in the field of risk assessment. For a mixed method of risk assessment, it is compliance with the balance and appropriateness of use between a quantitative and qualitative method of risk assessment.
In accordance with the selected types of economic activity, organizations that require strict compliance with production standards, legislation, licensing, etc., it is advisable to use quantitative methods of risk assessment. As an example, the risks associated with violation of the norms: the rates of environmental tax for emissions of pollutants into the air, stationary sources of pollution; disposal of hazardous waste; control over water use and discharges of enterprises.
A mandatory creation of a risk map for each organization is proposed. This is due to the fact that all risks must be structured and investigated, and a risk response method must be chosen for each of the risks. The risk map has a number of features and an important purpose in the corporate governance structure, in particular:
- risk matrix, or visualization for the top management of the organization;
- risk table, or working tool for risk management.
Risk assessment in any field is very important. Due to this, the company that invests in the improvement of the internal control system (ICS), in ICS support at a given level, subsequently receives effects in the form of savings, the absence of fines, and protection from corruption. As an example, protection against corruption provides timely detection of risks – red flags, which indicate possible manipulations.
References
- Guidance for applying Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)-related risks. Available at: https://www.coso.org/Pages/default.aspx
- Vitlinskyi, V. V., Velykoivanenko, H. I. (2004). Ryzykolohiia v ekonomitsi ta pidpryiemnytstvi. Kyiv: KNEU, 480.
- Nazarchuk, T. V., Kosiiuk, O. M. (2016). Menedzhment orhanizatsii. Kyiv: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury, 560.
- Starostina, A. O., Kravchenko, V. A. (2004). Ryzyk-Menedzhment teoriia ta praktyka. Kyiv: NTUU «KPI», 198.
- Karas, O. O., Vertel, V. V. (2015). Ryzyk menedzhment, metodychni vkazivky, shchodo samostiinoho vyvchannia materialu. Kyiv, 53.
- Kryshkin, O. V. (2013). Nastol'naya kniga po vnutrennemu auditu. Riski i biznes-protsessy. Moscow: OOO «AL'PINA PABLISHER», 37.
- Gibbs, M. T., Browman, H. I. (2015). Risk assessment and risk management: a primer for marine scientists. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72 (3), 992–996. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu232
- Rodricks, J. V. (1994). Risk assessment, the environment, and public health. Environmental Health Perspectives, 102 (3), 258–264. doi: http://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.94102258
- Ushvitskii, L. I., Kulagovskaya, T. A., Ter-Grigor’yants, A. A., Solovyova, I. V., Mezentseva, E. S. (2015). Methodological Tools for Risk Assessment in Industrial Enterprises. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5 (4), 1011–1016.
- Broilo, E. V., Nazarova, I. G. (2016). Methodological Approach to Assessing Performance of the Organization Projects. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9 (27). doi: http://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i27/97684
- Prochazka, J., Melichar, J. (2017). Methodological Framework for Operational Risk Assessment. Vojenske Rozhledy, 26 (4), 19–34. doi: http://doi.org/10.3849/2336-2995.26.2017.04.019-034
- Lamm, G. A., Haimes, Y. Y. (2002). Assessing and managing risks to information assurance: A methodological approach. Systems Engineering, 5 (4), 286–314. doi: http://doi.org/10.1002/sys.10030
- Adelsberger Z. et al. (2014). Risk Assessment for Building Security. Coll. Antropol, 38 (1), 215–227
- Iacob, V.-S. (2014). Risk Management And Evaluation And Qualitative Method Within The Projects. Ecoforum, 3 (1 (4)), 60–67.
- Bobrovych, O. B. (2013) Metodychni pidkhody do otsiniuvannia audytorskoho ryzyku. Naukovyi visnyk NLTU Ukrainy, 23.1, 216–224.
- Hryniuk, O. I. (2016). Naukovo-metodychni pidkhody do otsiniuvannia ta prohnozuvannia ryzykiv diialnosti naftohazovydobuvnykh pidpryiemstv. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu «Ekonomichni nauky», 1, 11–23.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Maksym Taraschevsky
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.