Optimization of the production plan by three-criterion modeling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2019.181104Keywords:
economic and mathematical tools, production planning, three-criterion task, enterprise activityAbstract
The object of research is the processes of optimizing the production plan according to certain criteria by modeling. One of the most problematic places is the complexity of coordination and taking into account the influence of criteria on the optimal production plan. From the point of view of mathematics, the search for the optimal result can be obtained with different criteria laid down, but from an economic point of view it is important to choose those that are of decisive importance. That is, their weight is important for the consumer in deciding on a purchase and for the manufacturer – in terms of the production capabilities of certain types of products and performance (production efficiency). This problem was solved by solving the three-criterion problem of planning production. The search for a compromise alternative was achieved through a step-by-step solution of the proposed mathematical model for optimizing the production plan according to the most important criteria for the producer and consumer: profit, quality and demand for products of each type, taking into account the known number of units of each resource.
The ideal point method, the simplex method and the Lagrange multiplier method are used. The test example provides an algorithm for solving the optimization problem. The result obtained – the three-criterion task of production planning has been solved, which makes it possible to maximize profit from production, product quality and demand for products with known initial resource components. The importance/significance of the developed scientific and methodological approach is confirmed/argued by the fact that the achievement of effective results of the enterprise’s activity directly depends on the optimal production plan.
Given the results of the conducted research, out of the many possible alternatives, the enterprise will be able to most efficiently produce the products necessary for the consumer by type and quality. That is, with known resource parameters, the maximum possible positive result is achieved for the manufacturer and for the consumer.
The proposed economic and mathematical tools can be used in solving problems of optimizing production in various sectors of the economy.References
- Blaug, M. (2008). Pareto, Vilfredo. 100 velikikh ekonomistov do Keinsa. Saint Petersburg: Ekonomikus, 233–235.
- Frish Ragnar. Laureaty Nobelevskoi premii. Nauka i tekhnika. Available at: http://n-t.ru/nl/ek/frisch.htm
- Hotelling, H. (1933). Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24 (6), 417–441. doi: http://doi.org/10.1037/h0071325
- Kantorovich, L. (1939). Matematicheskie metody organizacii i planirovaniia proizvodstva. Leningrad: Izdanie Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 67.
- Orlov, O. O. (2002). Planuvannia diialnosti promyslovoho pidpryiemstva. Kyiv: Skarby, 336.
- Blahodyr, L. M. (2016). Metodychni zasady otsiniuvannia efektyvnosti funktsionuvannia pidpryiemstva iz vykorystanniam vyrobnychykh funktsii. Ekonomika i suspilstvo, 4, 378–384. Available at: http://www.economyandsociety.in.ua/journal/4_ukr/62.pdf
- Vitlinskyi, V. V., Skitsko, V. I. (2006). Planuvannia obsiahu realizatsii produktsii ta debitorskoi zaborhovanosti pidpryiemstva v umovakh nevyznachenosti. Finansy Ukrainy, 5, 127–133.
- Hrabovetskyi, B. Ye. (2006). Vyrobnychi funktsii: teoriia, pobudova, vykorystannia v upravlinni vyrobnytstvom. Vinnytsia: UNIVERSUM–Vinnytsia, 138.
- Melikhov, A. A. (2014). Modeliuvannia innovatsiinoi skladovoi konkurentnoho rozvytku promyslovykh pidpryiemstv. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu, 3 (37), 144–153. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ecvd_2014_3_24
- Voynarenko, M., Dykha, M. V., Mykoliuk, O., Yemchuk, L., Danilkova, A. (2018). Assessment of an enterprise’s energy security based on multi-criteria tasks modeling. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16 (4), 102–116. doi: http://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(4).2018.10
- Marko, M. Ya., Tsehelyk, H. H., Hrypynska, N. V. (2017). Vykorystannia metodu poslidovnoho vvedennia obmezhen dlia rozviazannia odniiei dvokryterialnoi zadachi planuvannia vyrobnytstva. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Ekonomichni nauky, 1, 95–99.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Mariia Dykha, Nadiia Hrypynska, Hryhorii Tsehelyk, Mariia Marko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
