Development of an effective product quality management system

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2019.181515

Keywords:

management systems, product quality, integrated quality control systems, enterprise competitiveness

Abstract

The object of research is product quality management. During the research, the analysis method was used to study approaches to product quality management. The paper reveals the theoretical foundations for product quality management. It is shown that in order to control the quality of products, it is necessary to establish relations between subjects and objects of quality, their changes using the method of a systematic approach. This method shows that for the sustainable economic development of a manufacturing enterprise, first it is necessary to study the structure of the management system. After that, it will be possible to propose an improved control system, schematically depicting it.

The international standards proposed in the work will allow the manufacturer to be competitive among others. Producers who seek to export their products must implement in their production a system of measures focused on high product requirements. However, the transition to modern equipment should occur without any psychological discomfort for workers. Do not forget that the use of a quality management system in production is quite long and financially costly. The process of enterprise restructuring should be economically justified, since owners must have income from manufacturing products. That is, the implementation of a quality management system should be cost-effective for a manufacturing enterprise. The use of integrated quality control systems in the modern era of innovation is a sign of enterprise competitiveness.

In the work, an improved product quality management system is obtained. This is due to the fact that the proposed system has advantages, in particular, modernization of the material and technical base and employee incentives, not only through material rewards, but also through professional qualifications.

Thanks to this, it is possible to obtain new quality indicators. Compared with similar outdated quality methods, the proposed model provides such advantages as the introduction of innovative technologies and equipment in production, training in modern technologies for workers, and allows them to compete in the labor market.

Author Biographies

Nataly Gritsenko, Ukrainian State Academy of Railway Transport, 7, Feuerbach sqr., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61050

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Economics, Business and Personnel Management for Transport

Elizaveta Rud, Kharkiv Cooperative Trade and Economic College, 14-a, Netichenska naberezhna, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61004

Department of Entrepreneurship and Tourism

References

  1. Hrytsenko, N. V., Yakovenko, V. H. (2014). Formuvannia hnuchkoi modeli upravlinnia personalom na zaliznychnomu transporti. Naukovyi visnyk Donbaskoi derzhavnoi mashynobudivnoi akademii, 2 (14E), 144–148.
  2. Kostiuk, O. D. (2006). Kontseptsii suchasnykh system upravlinnia yakistiu produktsii ta posluh. Naukovi dopovidi NAU, 2 (3). Available at: http://base.dnsgb.com.ua/files/journal/Naukovi-dopovidi-NAU/2006-2/kostuk.pdf
  3. Momot, O. I. (2014). Mozhlyvosti vykorystannia mizhnarodnykh standartiv dlia pobudovy intehrovanykh system menedzhmentu. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu tekhnolohii ta dyzainu, 5 (37), 133–138.
  4. Midor, K., Žarnovský, J. (2016). Innovative Use of Quality Management Methods for Product Improvement. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 24 (4), 264–267. doi: http://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-08-04-2016
  5. Daly, T.; Kowalewski, M. (Ed.) (1994). Where Real Product Quality Starts. Quality and Statistics: Total Quality Management. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 43–52. doi: http://doi.org/10.1520/stp13191s
  6. Fedorov, H. Ye.; Fedorov, H. Ye. (Ed.) (2013). Kontrol yakosti produktsii v mashynobuduvanni. Kyiv: Kramatorsk, 332.
  7. Varianychenko, O. V., Karasova, H. V. (2009). Standarty ISO 9000: Yakist produktsii ta osnova doviry mizh vyrobnykom ta spozhyvachem. Ekonomichnyi visnyk NHU, 1, 115–122. Available at: http://ir.nmu.org.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/460/2009_1_p115-122.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  8. Total Quality Management (2017). Butterworth-Heinemann: Elsevier, 580. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/c2016-0-00426-6
  9. Yevropeiskyi fond upravlinnia yakistiu (2003). Yevropeiska yakist, 4, 5–8.
  10. Bureau Veritas Certification. Available at: https://certification.bureauveritas.com/
  11. BSI Group. Available at: https://www.bsigroup.com/
  12. Lloyd's Register Group. Available at: https://www.lr.org/
  13. TÜV SÜD. Available at: https://tuv-cert.de/
  14. Det Norske Veritas group. Available at: https://www.dnvgl.com/
  15. SGS. Available at: https://www.sgs.com/
  16. KEMA Laboratories. Available at: https://www.dnvgl.com/energy/laboratories/index.html
  17. Orlov, P. A. (2013). Vprovadzhennia system upravlinnia yakistiu: stan, problemy, perspektyvy. Standartyzatsiia, sertyfikatsiia, yakist, 6, 59–63.

Published

2019-07-25

How to Cite

Gritsenko, N., & Rud, E. (2019). Development of an effective product quality management system. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 5(4(49), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2019.181515