Theoretical and methodological provision of justification of the enterprise activity efficiency in the marketing aspect

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.206402

Keywords:

efficiency of the enterprise, marketing aspect, methodical support, project approach, economic effect.

Abstract

The object of research is the process of determining the main directions of improving the efficiency of the enterprise in the marketing aspect, that is taking into account both the peculiarities of its internal environment and market participants, that is the external environment. One of the problems is the insufficient consideration of the modern conceptual apparatus of efficiency. In addition, it is important in some cases to narrow the purpose of the project without taking into account the marketing aspect. An obstacle may be the difficulty of developing a list of criteria for selecting responsible project executors. It is often incomplete to take into account the strategic and current problems of improving the efficiency of the enterprise in the marketing aspect.

Proposals for clarifying the definition of «efficiency» and «marketing aspect», the use of a project approach that takes into account the two main components of efficiency are substantiated and developed. These include: objective in the use of resource potential of enterprises and subjective, which takes into account the peculiarities of information and communication and marketing interaction of market participants. These components of efficiency allowed to eliminate the identified shortcomings of the studied problem.

The main result of research is a substantiated and proposed content and sequence of stages of methodological support for determining areas for improving the efficiency of the enterprise in the marketing aspect. At the first stage it is expedient to form the purpose of the project. The second is to develop criteria for the selection and appointment of responsible executors. The third stage involves the definition and implementation of a comprehensive analysis of strategic and current issues to improve the efficiency of the enterprise in the marketing aspect. At the fourth stage, it is advisable to define a strategic goal and its structuring. The fifth stage is the substantiation of the main directions of efficiency increase. At the sixth stage, it is advisable to form alternatives to achieve the goals. At the seventh stage, the financial, personnel, production, innovation, information and communication and marketing costs of the project should be optimized. The eighth stage – the distribution of responsibility for the project between the structural units of the enterprise.

In the practical implementation of the developed methodological support there is a real possibility of transition to alternative options for project implementation in the conditions of constant transformations, which contributes to the formation of the economic effect at the macro-, meso- and microeconomic levels.

Author Biographies

Olena Iastremska, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics, 9 A, Nauky ave., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

Doctor of Economic Science, Professor

Department of Management, logistics and Economics

Oleksandr Gerasymov, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics, 9 A, Nauky ave., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

Postgraduate Student

Department of Management, logistics and Economics

References

  1. Khachaturov, T. S. (1979). Effektivnost kapitalnykh vlozhenii. Moscow: Izd-vo «Ekonomika», 384.
  2. Kuznietsova, O. V. (2014). Shchodo sutnosti ekonomichnoi efektyvnosti. Rozvytok metodiv upravlinnia i hospodariuvannia na transporti, 4 (49), 178–189.
  3. Morschenok, T. S. (2016). Research of going near determination of economic essence of concept «efficiency». Economic Bulletin of the Zaporozhye State Engineering Academy, 1 (01), 7–13.
  4. Svitlyshyn, I. I. (2015). Typolohiia efektyvnosti funktsionuvannia pidpryiemstva. Visnyk ZhDTU, 1 (71), 110–118.
  5. Ambler, T. (2000). Marketing and the Bottom Line: the New Metrics of corporate wealth. London: Prentice-Hall, 325.
  6. Anderson, C., Narus, J. A., van Rossum, W. Customer Value Propositions in Business Markets. Harvard business review, 84 (3), 90–99. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7263153_Customer_Value_Propositions_in_Business_Markets
  7. Shaw, R. (2001). Improving marketing effectiveness. London: Profile Books Ltd., 245.
  8. Bushuyev, S. D., Wagner, R. F. (2014). IPMA Delta and IPMA Organisational Competence Baseline (OCB). International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 7 (2), 302–310. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-10-2013-0049
  9. Bushuyev, S. D., Bushueva, N. S., Babayev, I. A., Yakovenko, V. B., Grisha, E. V., Dzyuba, S. V., Voitenko, A. S. (2010). Creative project management technologies and programs. Kyiv: Sammit kniga, 768.
  10. Bushuyev, S. D., Kharitonov, D. A., Rogozina, V. B. (2012). Organizational Project Management pathology. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, 10, 5–8.
  11. Kerzner, H. (1998). In search of excellence in Project Management. VNB, 274.
  12. Kerzner, H. (2001). Strategic Planning for Project Management Using a Project Management Maturity Model. John Wiley & Sons Inc., 226.
  13. Vlasova, N. O., Pichuhina, T. S., Kruhlova, O. A., Haidar, N. O. (2012). Otsinka efektyvnosti hospodarskoi diialnosti pidpryiemstv rozdribnoi torhivli. Kharkiv: Monohraf, 196.
  14. Hvozdiu, S. Yu. (2010). Methodological approaches of industrial enterprises innovation expenses effiecency evaluation. Bulletin of the National University of Lviv Polytechnic. Problems of economics and management, 683, 184–187.
  15. Hovorushko, T. A., Klymash, N. I. (2013). Upravlinnia efektyvnistiu diialnosti pidpryiemstv na osnovi vartisno-oriientovanoho pidkhodu. Kyiv: Lohos, 204.
  16. Herasymov, O. K. (2018). Methodical provision of enterprise’s economic efficiency assessment in the marketing aspect. Scientific notes of the National University «Ostroh Academy». Economy series, 1 (9 (37)), 32–39. doi: http://doi.org/10.25264/2311-5149-2018-9(37)-32-39
  17. Ralko, O. S. (2011). Pidkhody do efektyvnosti upravliannia orhanizatsiieiu. Naukovi zdobutky molodi – vyrishenniu problem kharchuvannia liudstva u ХХI stolitti. Kyiv: NUKhT, 161.
  18. Blocker, C. P., Flint, D. J., Myers, M. B., Slater, S. F. (2010). Proactive customer orientation and its role for creating customer value in global markets. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39 (2), 216–233. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0202-9
  19. Boulding, W., Staelin, R., Ehret, M., Johnston, W. J. (2005). A customer relationship management roadmap: what is known, potential pitfalls, and where to go. Journal of Marketing, 69 (4), 155–166. doi: http://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.155
  20. Bradford, T. W. (2015). Beyond Fungible: Transforming Money into Moral and Social Resources. Journal of Marketing, 79 (2), 79–97. doi: http://doi.org/10.1509/jm.13.0437
  21. Brakus, J. J., Schmitt, B. H., Zarantonello, L. (2009). Brand Experience: What Is It? How Is It Measured? Does It Affect Loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 73 (3), 52–68. doi: http://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.3.52
  22. Brown, S. L., Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1), 1–34. doi: http://doi.org/10.2307/2393807
  23. Cambra‐Fierro, J., Florin, J., Perez, L., Whitelock, J. (2011). Inter‐firm market orientation as antecedent of knowledge transfer, innovation and value creation in networks. Management Decision, 49 (3), 444–467. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111120798
  24. Copley, P. (2004). Marketing communications management: concepts, theories, cases and practices. Oxford: Jordan Hill, 480. doi: http://doi.org/10.4324/9780080473376
  25. Balabanova, L. V., Folomkina, I. S. (2009). Upravlinnia realizatsiieiu stratehii pidpryiemstva: marketynhovyi pidkhid. Donetsk: DonNUET, 402.
  26. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press, 396.
  27. Beshelev, S. D., Gurvich, F. G. (1980). Matematiko-statisticheskie metody ekspertnykh ocenok. Moscow: Statistika, 264.
  28. Ventcel, A. D. (1975). Kurs teorii sluchainykh processov. Moscow: Nauka, 320.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Iastremska, O., & Gerasymov, O. (2020). Theoretical and methodological provision of justification of the enterprise activity efficiency in the marketing aspect. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 3(4(53), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.206402

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 4(53) (2020): Economics of enterprises. Macroeconomics

Section

Economics and Enterprise Management: Original Research

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Olena Iastremska, Alexandr Gerasimov

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.