Digitalization impact on work quality at the enterprise operational level

Authors

  • Tetiana Tverdushka Private Higher Education Institution «International Institute of Business», 8a, Brest-Litovskyi highway, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03179, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0647-4309
  • Khristina Stoliaruk State Higher Educational Institution «Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman», 54/1, Peremohy ave., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03057, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9264-2024

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.211151

Keywords:

management strategy, digital transformation, R&D planning, working life quality, career management

Abstract

The object of research is the work quality of operational staff. One of the most problematic places in the introduction of new production technologies is the adaptation of personnel to digital transformation. Understanding and systematic management actions of managers can lead the company to business growth, make it more flexible through the proper use of digitalization as a potentially important component of business strategy.

Methods of logical generalization and analysis are used in the analysis of literature sources on the research topic. The work quality at the enterprise operational level was considered in two dimensions: the quality of work results and the quality of working life. During the sociological study at machine-building enterprises is developed a conceptual model of the interaction between work tasks, methods of labor organization and technological tools. According to the expert potential consequences assessment of the impact of digitalization on the operational staff work quality, the highest scores are given to the following factors: work intensity; content of work tasks; control over work; learning; motivation and work life balance; health; rights; career management. The Analytical Hierarchy Process, which allows to determine the components of the adaptation system of personnel to digital information and to form an algorithm for choosing the optimal version of the system for the enterprise, is also used.

The results of the presented study confirm the insufficient level of workers and industrial engineers readiness to implement changes related to the use of digital tools. The results provide a practical basis for the enterprises management to form a hierarchical structure of employee adaptation system to digital transformation. Presented system will be the projects framework for production technologies modernization, labor processes improving, staff training and the successful implementation procuring of digital transformation based on the model of interaction between work tasks, methods and technological tools at the operational level of the enterprise.

Author Biographies

Tetiana Tverdushka, Private Higher Education Institution «International Institute of Business», 8a, Brest-Litovskyi highway, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03179

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Business Administration

Khristina Stoliaruk, State Higher Educational Institution «Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman», 54/1, Peremohy ave., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03057

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Personnel Management and Labour Economics

References

  1. Ivanova, A. S., Holionko, N. G., Tverdushka, T. B., Olejarz, T. et. al. (2019). The Strategic Management in Terms of an Enterprise’s Technological Development. Journal of Competitiveness, 11 (4), 40–56. doi: http://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2019.04.03
  2. McKinsey Global Institute (2011). The Net’s sweeping impact on growth, jobs, and prosperity. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/Technology%20Media%20and%20Telecommunications/High%20Tech/Our%20Insights/Internet%20matters/MGI_internet_matters_exec_summary.pdf
  3. Eurofound and the International Labour Office (2017). Working anytime, anywhere: The effects on the world of work. Geneva: Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, and the International Labour Office. Available at: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2017/working-anytime-anywhere-the-effects-on-the-world-of-work
  4. The Global Information Technology Report (2016). Growth and Jobs in a Hyperconnected World. World Economic Forum and INSEAD. Available at: www.weforum.org/gitr
  5. Hämäläinen, E., Inkinen, T. (2017). How to Generate Economic and Sustainability Reports from Big Data? Qualifications of Process Industry. Processes, 5 (4), 64. doi: http://doi.org/10.3390/pr5040064
  6. Petrova, I. (2013). Rynok innovatsiinoi pratsi: tendentsii formuvannia v Ukraini. Ukraina: aspekty pratsi, 5, 3–7.
  7. Career Development Institute. (2013). The ACEG framework for careers and work-related education. Stourbridge: CDI. Available at: https://www.centralcareershub.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/CDI-Framework-web.pdf
  8. Silvestroni, C., Münstermann, K. (2015). Career Guidance in Germany. German Federal Employment Agency (BA), International and Specialized Services (ZAV), 13. Available at: https://euroguidance.ie/sites/default/files/images/uploads/Career%20Guidance%20in%20GERMANY.pdf
  9. Kolot, A., Gerasimenko, O. (2016). Values of working life and decent work: philosophy of interaction and development. Ukraine: aspects of work, 1-2, 3–13.
  10. Kolot, A., Herasymenko, O. (2018). Innovative labor and its intellectualization as strategic vectors of the formation of the new economy. Economics of Management Organization, 1 (29), 6–23.
  11. Kolot, A. M., Hrishnova, O. A. et. al. (2012). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist: teoriia i praktyka rozvytku. Kyiv: KNEU, 501.
  12. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2015). Handbook on Measuring Quality of Employment – A Statistical Framework. New York and Geneva: United Nations. Available at: http://www.unece.org/index.php?id=41346
  13. Bersin, J. (2017). Catch the wave: The 21st-century career Deloitte Review, issue 21. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/deloitte-review/issue-21/changing-nature-of-careers-in-21st-century.html
  14. Keister, R., Lewandowski, P. (2016). A routine transition? Causes and consequences of the changing job content of jobs in central and eastern Europe. ISB Policy Paper 05/2016.
  15. Vogel, S. (2017). Addressing digital and technological change through social dialogue. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Available at: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2017/eu-member-states/addressing-digital-and-technological-change-through-social-dialogue
  16. Bothfeld, S., Leschke, J. (2012). “More and better jobs”: is quality of work still an issue – and was it ever? Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 18 (3), 337–353. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/1024258912448602
  17. Piasna, A. (2017). Bad jobs recovery? European Job Quality Index 2005–2015. Working Paper 2017.06. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute. doi: http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3103624
  18. Valenduc, G., Vendramin, P. (2016). Work in the digital economy: sorting the old from the new. ETUI Working papers 2016.03. Brussels: ETUI. Available at: https://www.etui.org/publications/working-papers/work-in-the-digital-economy-sorting-the-old-from-the-new
  19. OECD. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2014). How good is your job? A Framework for measuring and assessing job quality. Paris: OECD Publishing in OECD Employment Outlook. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/sdd/labour-stats/Job-quality-OECD.pdf
  20. Muñoz-de-Bustillo, R., Grande, R., Fernández-Macías, E. (2017). An approximation of job quality and innovation using the 3rd European Company Survey. QuInnE working paper. Available at: https://www.soc.lu.se/en/sites/soc.lu.se.en/files/quinne_working_paper_no._4.pdf
  21. Höfer, M. (2013). Vielleicht will der Kapitalismus gar nicht, dass wir glücklich sind? Erkenntnisse eines Geläuterten. Maybe capitalism does not want us to be happy? Albrecht Knaus Verlag, 280.
  22. Berger, T., Frey, C. B. (2016). Digitalisation, Jobs and Convergence in Europe: Strategies for Closing the Skills Gap. Available at: https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/reports/SCALE_Digitalisation_Final.pdf
  23. Emelianov, S. V., Larichev, O. I. (1985). Mnogokriterialnye metody priniatiia reshenii. Moscow: Znanie, 32.
  24. Saati, T. L. (1977). Matematicheskie modeli konfliktnykh situatsii. Moscow: Sovetskoe radio, 303.
  25. Larichev, O. I., Moshkovich, E. M. (1996). Kachestvennye metody priniatiia resheniĭ. Verbalnyĭ analiz resheniĭ. Moscow: Nauka: Fizmatlit, 208.
  26. Weber, P. C., Katsarov, J., Cohen-Scali, V., Mulvey, R., Nota, L., Rossier, J., Thomsen, R. (2018). European Research Agenda for Career Guidance and Counselling, New Perspectives on Career Counseling and Guidance in Europe. Berlin: Springer, 219–250. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61476-2_14
  27. De Vos, A., Cambré, B. (2016). Career Management in High-Performing Organizations: A Set-Theoretic Approach. Human Resource Management, 56 (3), 501–518. doi: http://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21786
  28. International Labour Organisation. (2008). Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization. Geneva. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---cabinet/documents/genericdocument/wcms_371208.pdf
  29. Kiss, M. (2017). Digital Skills in the EU Labour Market. Available at: https://euagenda.eu/upload/publications/untitled-108183-ea.pdf

Downloads

Published

2020-08-31

How to Cite

Tverdushka, T., & Stoliaruk, K. (2020). Digitalization impact on work quality at the enterprise operational level. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(4(54), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.211151