Validating measurement techniques during accreditation of testing laboratory validating

Authors

  • Евгений Тимофеевич Володарский National Technical University of Ukraine “Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, 37, Prospect Peremohy, 03056, Kyiv-56, Ukraine
  • Лариса Александровна Кошевая National Aviation University, ave. Komarova, 1, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03058, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2014.21715

Keywords:

validation, statistical criterion, acceptability of results, precision, accuracy, measurement uncertainty

Abstract

The procedure of validating measurement techniques, which is necessary during accreditation of testing laboratories, is described in the paper. Today, the validation procedure in most cases does not have a regulatory-methodological support. The peculiarity of its conducting in different situations, which occur in practical activities of testing laboratories, is shown. The examples of calculating validation characteristics, the choice of which depends on the type of a measurement technique, its modification extent, alteration of intermediate precision factors, have been presented. It is shown that the necessary condition for validating a certificated technique is the confirmation of acceptability of results using statistical criteria. The association between statistical accuracy indicators of a technique and measurement uncertainty has been considered. It is shown that random factors are estimated by repeatability, equipment influence, calibration, conditions, operator, i.e. reproducibility, while factors, unaccounted by these characteristics, are estimated by uncertainty of results.

Author Biographies

Евгений Тимофеевич Володарский, National Technical University of Ukraine “Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, 37, Prospect Peremohy, 03056, Kyiv-56

Dr. Of Sci. (Engineering), Professor

Department of Automation experimental studies

Лариса Александровна Кошевая, National Aviation University, ave. Komarova, 1, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03058

Dr. Of Sci. (Engineering), Professor

Department of Biocybernetics and Aerospace Medicine

References

  1. ISO/IEC 17025. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories [Text]. – ISO/CASCO, 2005. – 28 р.
  2. Egan, H. Collaborative interlaboratory studies in chemical analysis [Text]/ H. Egan, T. S. West (Eds.). – Oxford, etc.: Pergamon Press, 1982. – 171 р.
  3. EURACHEM Guide. The Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods. A Laboratory Guide to Method Validation and Related Topics [Text]. – Eurachem, 1998. – 61 р.
  4. IUPAC Guide. Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis [Text] / Pure Appl. Chem., 2002.–V. 74.–№ 5.– Р. 835 – 855.
  5. ДСТУ ГОСТ 8.010:99. Методики виконання вимірювань [Текст]. – Чинний від 2003-05-01. – К.: Держстандарт України, 2003. – 20 с.
  6. ISO 5725-1:1994. Аccuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Рart 1: General principles and definitions [Text]. – ISO, 1994. – 17 р.
  7. Р 50.2.060.- 2008 ГСИ. Рекомендация. Внедрение стандартизованных методик количественного химического анализа в лаборатории. Подтверждение соответствия установленным требованиям [Текст]. – Введ. с 25.11.2008. – М.: Стандартинформ, 2008. – 15 с.
  8. ISO 5725-6:1994. Аccuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods. Рart 6. Use in practice of accuracy values [Text]. – ISO, 1994. – 41 р.
  9. Guide ILAC G17:2002. Introducing the Concept of Uncertainty of Measurement in Testing in Association with the Application of the Standard ISO/IEC 17025. [Electronic resource]. – Available at: www/URL: http://aac-analitica.ru/
  10. ISO 10576-1:2003. Guidelines for the evaluation of conformity with specified requirements. Part 1: General principles [Text]. – ISO, 2003. – 17 р.
  11. ISO/TS 21748:2010. Guidance for the use of repeatability, reproducibility and trueness estimates in measurement uncertainty estimation [Text]. – ISO, 2010. – 38 р.
  12. ISO/IEC 17025. (2005). General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO/CASCO, 28.
  13. In: Egan, H., West, T. S. (1982). Collaborative interlaboratory studies in chemical analysis. Oxford, etc.: Pergamon Press, 171.
  14. EURACHEM Guide. (1998). The Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods. A Laboratory Guide to Method Validation and Related Topics. Eurachem, 61.
  15. IUPAC Guide. (2002). Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis. Pure Appl. Chem., V. 74, № 5, 835-855.
  16. DSTU GOST 8.010:99. (2003). Metodiki vikonannja vimіrjuvan'. K.: Derzhstandart Ukraini, 20.
  17. ISO 5725-1:1994. (1998). Аccuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Рart 1: General principles and definitions. ISO, 17.
  18. R 50.2.060 – 2008 GSI. (2008). Vnedrenie standartizovannyh metodik koliche-stvennogo himicheskogo analiza v laboratorii. Podtverzhdenie sootvetstvija ustanovlennym trebovanijam. M.: Standartinform, 15.
  19. ISO 5725-6:1994. (2001). Аccuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods. Рart 6. Use in practice of accuracy values. ISO, 41.
  20. ILAC G17:2002. (2002). Introducing the Concept of Uncertainty of Measurement in Testing in Association with the Application of the Standard ISO/IEC 17025. Available: http://aac-analitica.ru/
  21. ISO 10576-1:2003. (2003). Guidelines for the evaluation of conformity with specified requirements. Part 1: General principles. ISO, 17.
  22. ISO/TS 21748:2004. (2010). Guidance for the use of repeatability, reproducibility and trueness estimates in measurement uncertainty estimation. ISO, 38.

Published

2014-02-06

How to Cite

Володарский, Е. Т., & Кошевая, Л. А. (2014). Validating measurement techniques during accreditation of testing laboratory validating. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(5(15), 9–11. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2014.21715