Evolution of theories of shadow economy formation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.218711

Keywords:

shadow economy, theory of shadow economy emergence, bibliometric analysis, policy of unshadowing the economy, economic development

Abstract

The object of research is the theory of formation of the shadow sector of the economy. The paper presents an evolutionary analysis of theories of the shadow economy emergence. It deals with the study of the main theories of the emergence of the informal sector of the economy and determines their features, preconditions of origin, and drivers. Based on the systematization of literary research of scholars, the following groups of theories have been identified: modernization theory, neoliberal theory, institutional theory, the theory of political economy. The analysis of the economic content of the concept of the shadow economy emergence has been used to identify the most influential drivers of the transition of economic entities into the «underground». In particular, the most influential factors include the level of centralization of power, the economic development of the country, the quality of the institutional environment, etc. The analysis of approaches to understanding the definition of the «shadow economy» revealed ambiguous interpretations of the concept of the shadow economy and a significant number of synonyms used in the study of the shadow economy. The Google Trends toolkit was used to prove the multivariate approaches to understanding the essence of this phenomenon. The most common interpretations include the shadow economy, the informal economy, the underground economy, the black economy, and the non-observed economy. The bibliometric analysis of scientific publications in journals indexed in Scopus and WoS databases for 2014–2020 yielded three main clusters, which combine papers that deal with the study of the theory of shadow economy. They are as follows: the shadow economy emerges mainly due to low rates of economic development of the country; the shadow economy emerges due to high unemployment; the growing share of the shadow sector of the economy is a consequence of ineffective government policies. The study concluded that the key task in the implementation of state policy aimed at combating the shadow economy should be coordination the state prevention measures with the most influential drivers of growth in the share of the shadow sector of the economy.

Author Biographies

Andrii Zolkover, Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, 2, Nemyrovycha-Danchenka str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 01011

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Economics and Services

Dmytro Kovalenko, Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, 2, Nemyrovycha-Danchenka str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 01011

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Finance and Financial and Economic Security

References

  1. Williams, C., Schneider, F. (2016). Measuring the Global Shadow Economy: The Prevalence of Informal Work and Labour Hardcover. Measuring the Global Shadow Economy: The Prevalence of Informal Work and Labour, 247.
  2. Zahalni tendentsii tinovoi ekonomiky v Ukraini u 2019 rotsi (2019). Department ekonomichnoi stratehii ta makroekonomichnoho rozvytku i torhivli Ukrainy. Available at: https://ucap.io/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/1_shadow_2019.pdf
  3. Cherniavskyi, S. S., Nekrasov, V. A., Tytko, A. V. (Red.) (2017). Tinova ekonomika v Ukraini: stan, tendentsii, shliakhy podolannia. Kyiv: Natsionalna akademiia vnutrishnikh sprav, 152.
  4. Berdiev, A. N., Saunoris, J. W. (2016). Financial development and the shadow economy: A panel VAR analysis. Economic Modelling, 57, 197–207. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.03.028
  5. Mazhar, U., Méon, P.-G. (2017). Taxing the unobservable: The impact of the shadow economy on inflation and taxation. World Development, 90, 89–103. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.08.019
  6. Chen, K., Ren, J., Zha, T. (2018). The Nexus of Monetary Policy and Shadow Banking in China. American Economic Review, 108 (12), 3891–3936. doi: http://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20170133
  7. Foster, C., Frieden, J. (2017). Crisis of trust: Socio-economic determinants of Europeans’ confidence in government. European Union Politics, 18 (4), 511–535. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/1465116517723499
  8. Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., Tamayo, A. (2017). Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis. The Journal of Finance, 72 (4), 1785–1824. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12505
  9. Moreira, A., Savov, A. (2017). The Macroeconomics of Shadow Banking. The Journal of Finance, 72 (6), 2381–2432. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12540
  10. Tiutiunyk, I., Kobushko, I., Ivaniy, O., Flaumer, A. (2019). Innovations in the management of tax gaps in the economy: foreign economic component. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 112–125. doi: http://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.3-09
  11. Hart, K. (1973). Informal Income Opportunities and Urban Employment in Ghana. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 11 (1), 61–89. doi: http://doi.org/10.1017/s0022278x00008089
  12. Tiutiunyk, I. V., Humenna, Yu. H. (2018). Illicit financial flows of economic subjects: value aspect. Prychornomorski ekonomichni studii, 33, 208–212.
  13. Osipov, G. V., Glotov, V. I., Karepova, S. G. (2018). Population in the shadow market: petty corruption and unpaid taxes. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6 (2), 692–710. doi: http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.2(16)
  14. Medina, L., Schneider, F. (2018). Shadow Economies Around the World: What Did We Learn Over the Last 20 Years? IMF Working Papers, 18 (17), 1. doi: http://doi.org/10.5089/9781484338636.001

Downloads

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

Zolkover, A., & Kovalenko, D. (2020). Evolution of theories of shadow economy formation. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 6(4(56), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.218711

Issue

Section

Development of Productive Forces and Regional Economy: Original Research