Determination of features of development of modern theories of management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2021.225380Keywords:
management theories, digital technologies, intangible assets, corporate culture, Agile philosophyAbstract
The object of research is the processes of development of modern management theories. One of the next problematic aspects is the identification of the peculiarities of the development of modern management theory in the period of digitalization and pandemic, which means a significant impact on the economy.
In the process of work general scientific methods were used: induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, comparison, systematization. The analysis of scientific approaches to the definition of management is carried out; the main essential features of modern enterprises and management theories, respectively, are determined. It is determined that the theory of management at the present level undergoes significant transformations. In modern theories more and more attention is paid to: the intangible component and the peculiarities of its management; there is an active transition to digital technologies and digitalization of business; there is a need to use new management methods; organizational structures and corporate cultures are changing. This in turn contributes to the purposeful formation and development of such institutions within the organization as:
– trust and creative atmosphere of productive group work;
– development of organizational ties within the organization and outside it;
– development of innovative ability of the company’s staff;
– use of experience of other organizations.
Based on the analysis, the following features of modern management theories are identified:
– in modern theories more and more attention is paid to the intangible component and the peculiarities of its management;
– active transition to digital technologies and digitalization of business;
– change in the subject of work in most employees, in particular, the transition to advanced information and communication technologies;
– the need to use new management methods;
– transformation of organizational structures and corporate cultures. This provides the possibility of effective modern management by planning the activities of the firm in the short, medium and long term, as well as obtaining the maximum possible profit with minimal costs in a rapidly changing environment.
References
- Zakharchyn, H. M. (Ed.) (2011). Evoliutsiinyi rozvytok system menedzhmentu i orhanizatsiinoi kultury. Korporatyvna kultura. Available at: http://nebotan.info/corporative/management.php
- Сучасна ситуація в теоріi і практиці світового менеджменту. URL: https://elib.bsu.by/bitstream/.pdf
- Tkachuk, H. O. (2019). Tsyfrovi transformatsii: vzaiemozviazok iz systemoiu ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemstva. Ekonomika kharchovoi promyslovosti, 11 (4), 42–50.
- Tapskott, D.; Pisareva, S. (Ed.) (1999). Elektronno-tsifrovoe obschestvo: pliusy i minusy setevogo intellekta. Kyiv: ITN Press; Moscow: Refl-buk, 403.
- Mesenbourg, T. L. (2001). Measuring the Digital Economy. US Bureau of the Census, Suitland.
- Amosov, A. A. (2011). Povyshenie proizvoditelnosti truda. Ekonomist, 1, 205.
- Bazarov, T. Iu. (2011). Upravlenie personalom razvivaiuscheisia organizatsii. Moscow: IPK GS, 334.
- Napravleniia i tendentsii razvitiia sovremennogo menedzhmenta. Available at: https://finances.social/menedjment_695/napravleniya-tendentsii-razvitiya-sovremennogo-41196.html
- Zhaldak, G. P. (2014). Formation bases of socioeconomic mechanism of innovative development of industrial enterprises. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 3 (3 (17)), 43–46. doi: http://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2014.25398
- Filev, V. V. (2008). Upravlenie rostom proizvoditelnosti truda. Ekonomist, 3, 2–12.
- Dusharina, E. Iu. (2020). Key elements of corporate culture. Journal of Economics and Business, 3-1 (60), 64–67. doi: http://doi.org/10.24411/2411-0450-2020-10169
- Tsurri, O. G. (2016). Firmennii stil v sozdanii blagopriiatnogo imidzha kompanii. Almanakh teoreticheskikh i prikladnykh issledovanii reklamy, 1, 91–96.
- Gridneva, E. A. (2007). Firmennii stil kak problema sovremennoi estetiki. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo, 6, 288–292.
- Skulmovskaia, L. G., Klimenko, A. A. (2009). Korporativnye tsennosti kak faktor razvitiia korporativnoi kultury. Vestnik Tiumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 4, 101–105.
- Shevchenko, I. L. (2016). Korporativnaia kultura kak mekhanizm korporativnogo upravleniia. Vestnik Iuzhno-Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 4 (10), 116–121.
- Okatov, A. V., Solovev, D. A. (2017). Poniatie i vidy korporativnoi kultury. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta, 3 (11), 35–47.
- Merzlov, I. (2018). Rol AGILE v protsesse prekhoda k Industrii 4.0. Razvitie menedzhmenta v Industrii 4.0: perekhod k kiberfizicheskim organizatsiiam i formirovanie ikh sistem upravleniia. Perm, 94–98. Available at: http://www.psu.ru/files/docs/science/books/sborniki/razvitie-menedzhmenta-v-industrii-4.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Анна Петровна Жалдак
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.