Justification of the number of samples of weapons and military techniques for performing tasks

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2022.262797

Keywords:

samples of weapons and military equipment, predicted efficiency of use, composition of troops, multi-criteria optimization methods

Abstract

During the research of the use issue of samples of weapons and military equipment in operations, a significant correlation was established between the predicted effectiveness of such use and the characteristics of the quantitative and qualitative composition of samples of weapons and military equipment. Taking this into account, it is clear that while preparing any operation, it would be desirable to have such a basis of the composition of samples of weapons and military equipment, which is well-founded and can only be adjusted in the conditions of a certain operation. The objects of the research are the samples of weapons and military equipment that are the part of the groups of troops (forces). However, the results of the analysis show that the existing methods for substantiating the composition of samples of weapons and military equipment need improvement. First of all, this concerns the determination of the basic (support) version of the composition of samples of weapons and military equipment (WME). As in the existing methods, the basic (support) version of the composition is not determined, it is chosen by comparing the composition of one's troops and the enemy's troops according to their combat potential. This approach does not provide an opportunity to compare the groups, taking into account the specifics of the use of their striking equipment and to create the necessary balance of forces at all stages of the operation.

Taking into account the above, we conducted the researches that made it possible to determine that with certain proportions, characteristic of the organizational structure of the absolute majority of military formations, there is a close to linear relationship between the number of their personnel and WME and combat potential.

Based on the research results, an improved method of determining the basic (support) composition of samples of weapons and military equipment in operation is proposed.

Author Biographies

Volodymyr Dudnyk, Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy

PhD, Associate Professor, Professor

Department of Fire Training

Oleksiy Grishchyn, Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy

Senior Lecturer

Department of Fire Training

Vitaliy Netrebko, Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy

Senior Lecturer

Department of Fire Training

Oleksandr Kmin, Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy

Senior Lecturer

Department of Fire Training

Alexander Bohachev, Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy

Lecturer

Department of Fire Training

References

  1. Shyshatskyi, A. V., Bashkyrov, O. M., Kostyna, O. M. (2015). Rozvytok intehrovanykh system zv’iazku ta peredachi danykh dlia potreb Zbroinykh Syl. Naukovo-tekhnichnyi zhurnal «Ozbroiennia ta viiskova tekhnika», 1 (5), 35–40.
  2. Zahorka, O. M., Mosov, S. P., Sbyttniev, A. I., Stuzhuk, P. I. (2005). Elementy doslidzhennia skladnykh system viiskovoho pryznachennia. Kyiv: NAO Ukrainy, 100.
  3. Telelym, V. M., Zahorka, O. M., Stryzhevskyi, V. V. (2012). Dosvid stvorennia ta zastosuvannia uhrupovan viisk (syl) u lokalnykh viinakh i zbroinykh konfliktakh druhoi polovyny XX ta na pochatku XXI stolittia. Kyiv: NUOU, 336.
  4. Romanchenko, I. S., Kotliarov, V. P., Shapoval, Yu. Ye., Smirnov, O. O. (2008). Metodyka vyznachennia vykhidnoho spivvidnoshennia syl storin iz dotrymanniam vymoh do operatsii. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats. TsNDI ZS Ukrainy, 3 (45), 14–18.
  5. Nikitenko, A. P. (2019). Metod vyznachennia bazovoho (opornoho) boiovoho skladu operatyvnoho uhrupovannia viisk. Problemy koordynatsii voienno-tekhnichnoi ta oboronno-promyslovoi polityky Ukrainy. Perspektyvy rozvytku ozbroiennia ta viiskovoi tekhniky, 205–206.
  6. Pilar, A. B.-C., Pérez, C.-F. B., Sancho, R., Lorente, M., Sastre, G., González, C. (2019). A new tool for evaluating and/or selecting analytical methods: Summarizing the information in a hexagon. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 118, 538–547. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2019.06.015
  7. Ramaji, I. J., Memari, A. M. (2018). Interpretation of structural analytical models from the coordination view in building information models. Automation in Construction, 90, 117–133. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.02.025
  8. Pérez-González, C. J., Colebrook, M., Roda-García, J. L., Rosa-Remedios, C. B. (2019). Developing a data analytics platform to support decision making in emergency and security management. Expert Systems with Applications, 120, 167–184. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.11.023
  9. Chen, H. (2018). Evaluation of Personalized Service Level for Library Information Management Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Procedia Computer Science, 131, 952–958. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.233
  10. Chan, H. K., Sun, X., Chung, S.-H. (2019). When should fuzzy analytic hierarchy process be used instead of analytic hierarchy process? Decision Support Systems, 125. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2019.113114

Downloads

Published

2022-08-23

How to Cite

Dudnyk, V., Grishchyn, O., Netrebko, V., Kmin, O., & Bohachev, A. (2022). Justification of the number of samples of weapons and military techniques for performing tasks. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(2(66), 33–36. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2022.262797

Issue

Section

Systems and Control Processes: Reports on Research Projects