Improved methodology development for assessing the reservoir collector properties by the quantitative reservoir characterization tools

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2022.263640

Keywords:

fluid transfer, pore space, reservoir rock, uncertainty degree, representative elementary volume, Minkowski functions

Abstract

The object of research in the paper is the process of fluid transfer through the pore space of the reservoir rock. In this paper, using an expert method, the shortcomings of the Ukrainian methodology for assessing the reservoir properties of the reservoir were highlighted. In particular, the sources of uncertainty accumulation in determining the absolute values of the reservoir's filtration parameters have been identified. The existing problem is that the algorithms of actions, which are the basis of the Ukrainian method of assessing reservoir properties, introduce a significant degree of uncertainty into the assessment results.

In order to reduce uncertainty, the introduction of the concept of a representative elemental volume is considered when conducting laboratory research and the construction of a three-dimensional digital model of this elementary volume. It is suggested to improve the Ukrainian method of assessing the collector properties of the deposit based on current Western research.

It was established that the standard methods of assessing the reservoir properties of the deposit are a source of accumulation of uncertainty in the development of technological documentation for the development of the deposit. The work is aimed at the development of an improved methodology for assessing the collector properties of the deposit. It is proposed to add to the action algorithm the stage of determining the representative volume of the sample, building its three-dimensional model, and digitizing it. At the final stage, the connectivity of the pores inside the sample is determined using the Minkowski function to improve the quality of the project documentation for the development of deposits. Guidelines have been developed to improve standard methods for assessing the collector properties of the deposit. The use of an improved methodology for assessing the reservoir properties of the deposit leads to a significantly lower degree of uncertainty and helps to form a more reliable picture of the operation of the reservoir at the design stage of its development. The presented study will be useful for the engineering personnel of foreign contractor companies, as it justifies the need to collect additional core material and sets the quality criteria of the information obtained about the collector properties of the deposit.

Author Biographies

Olena Martus, National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic»

Postgraduate Student

Department of Oil and Gas Engineering and Technologies

Oleksandr Petrash, National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic»

PhD

Department of Oil and Gas Engineering and Technologies

References

  1. Vogel, H.-J., Weller, U., Schlüter, S. (2010). Quantification of soil structure based on Minkowski functions. Computers & Geosciences, 36 (10), 1236–1245. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.03.007
  2. Vogel, H. J., Roth, K. (1998). A new approach for determining effective soil hydraulic functions. European Journal of Soil Science, 49 (4), 547–556. doi: http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.1998.4940547.x
  3. Cvetkovic, B. (2009). Well Production Decline, 113–125.
  4. Blunt, M. J. (2017). Multiphase flow in permeable media: A pore-scale perspective. Cambridge university press, 16–56. doi: http://doi.org/10.1017/9781316145098
  5. Cnudde, V., Boone, M. N. (2013). High-resolution X-ray computed tomography in geosciences: A review of the current technology and applications. Earth-Science Reviews, 123, 1–17. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.04.003
  6. Wildenschild, D., Sheppard, A. P. (2013). X-ray imaging and analysis techniques for quantifying pore-scale structure and processes in subsurface porous medium systems. Advances in Water Resources, 51, 217–246. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.018
  7. Schlüter, S., Sheppard, A., Brown, K., Wildenschild, D. (2014). Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X-ray microtomography: A review. Water Resources Research, 50 (4), 3615–3639. doi: http://doi.org/10.1002/2014wr015256
  8. Blunt, M. J., Bijeljic, B., Dong, H., Gharbi, O., Iglauer, S., Mostaghimi, P. et. al. (2013). Pore-scale imaging and modelling. Advances in Water Resources, 51, 197–216. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.003
  9. Øren, P.-E., Bakke, S., Arntzen, O. J. (1998). Extending Predictive Capabilities to Network Models. SPE Journal, 3 (4), 324–336. doi: http://doi.org/10.2118/52052-pa
  10. Guises, R., Xiang, J., Latham, J.-P., Munjiza, A. (2009). Granular packing: numerical simulation and the characterisation of the effect of particle shape. Granular Matter, 11 (5), 281–292. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-009-0148-0
  11. Øren, P.-E., Bakke, S., Held, R. (2007). Direct pore-scale computation of material and transport properties for North Sea reservoir rocks. Water Resources Research, 43 (12), 44–53. doi: http://doi.org/10.1029/2006wr005754
  12. Strebelle, S. (2002). Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics. Mathematical geology, 34 (1), 1–21. doi: http://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014009426274
  13. Adler, P. M., Jacquin, C. G., Quiblier, J. A. (1990). Flow in simulated porous media. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 16 (4), 691–712. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(90)90025-e
  14. Latief, F. D. E., Biswal, B., Fauzi, U., Hilfer, R. (2010). Continuum reconstruction of the pore scale microstructure for Fontainebleau sandstone. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 389 (8), 1607–1618. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2009.12.006
  15. Hilfer, R., Zauner, T. (2011). High-precision synthetic computed tomography of reconstructed porous media. Physical Review E, 84 (6). doi: http://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.84.062301
  16. Hilfer, R., Lemmer, A. (2015). Differential porosimetry and permeametry for random porous media. Physical Review E, 92 (1). doi: http://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.92.013305
  17. Hilpert, M., Miller, C. T. (2001). Pore-morphology-based simulation of drainage in totally wetting porous media. Advances in Water Resources, 24 (3-4), 243–255. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1708(00)00056-7
  18. Serra, J. (1986). Introduction to mathematical morphology. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 35 (3), 283–305. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/0734-189x(86)90002-2
  19. Vogel, H.-J., Roth, K. (2001). Quantitative morphology and network representation of soil pore structure. Advances in Water Resources, 24 (3-4), 233–242. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1708(00)00055-5
  20. Vogel, H. J. (2002). Topological characterization of porous media. Morphology of condensed matter. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 75–92. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45782-8_3

Downloads

Published

2022-08-29

How to Cite

Martus, O., & Petrash, O. (2022). Improved methodology development for assessing the reservoir collector properties by the quantitative reservoir characterization tools. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(1(66), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2022.263640

Issue

Section

Technology and System of Power Supply: Reports on Research Projects