Justification of approaches to development of the standard civil society organization based on international experience

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2022.267575

Keywords:

organization standard of Ukraine, enterprise standard, public organization, DSTU ISO 9001:2015, Quality Standard

Abstract

The object of the research is the principles of the quality management system and the interaction of different approaches to the quality assessment of civil society organizations (CSOs). In many countries, regulatory documents have not been developed regarding the quality management of the CSO activities. Let’s consider this problem using the example of Ukraine, since there has been an increase in the number of public associations by more than 85,000 during the last decade. Along with it, the principles of implementing DSTU ISO 9001:2015 for non-commercial, in particular civil organizations, are not sufficiently clear, given the various socio-cultural and economic prerequisites.

Based on theoretical and analytical methods, it is proposed to conduct an in-depth analysis of the problem and further justification of the implementation of the practice of compliance with Quality Standards and good governance in civil society organizations. That is primarily due to the desire of CSOs themselves to self-organize, reinforced by the need to establish partnership relations with state authorities and commercial organizations, which is accompanied by the fulfillment of requirements for transparency, accountability, and effectiveness of CSOs activities. Adherence to Quality Standards forms a commitment on the part of CSOs to generally accepted ethical principles and standards of behavior, which further contributes to the achievement of social legitimacy.

Based on the analyzed regulatory and technical documentation, the need to develop a Quality Standard of Ukraine for CSOs based on the complementarity of different approaches to evaluating the quality of organizations according to the «Quality Standard of CSOs» and DSTU ISO 9001:2015 is substantiated.

The results of the analysis of registered public associations by organizational and legal forms in Ukraine confirm the tendency to increase their number, which is a prerequisite for the implementation of the international experience of using the CSO Quality Standard. Taking into account the results of a comparative assessment of the principles of the CSO Quality Standard and DSTU ISO 9001:2015, wit is possible to state that there are no differences in the main approaches to managing the quality system of organizations. The governance aspects of the Modified Organizational Capacity Assessment Tool are similar to those of the «Quality Standard of CSOs», based on the subcategories: authorities; values, vision, and mission of the organization; management style and leadership; strategic planning.

Supporting Agency

  • The coverage of the research in the form of publication was due to financial support in the form of a grant from SUES (Support to Ukrainian Editorial Staff).

Author Biographies

Kateryna Pylypko, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine; Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Department of Standardization and Certification of Agricultural Products;

Department of Ecology and Zoology

 

Leonora Adamchuk, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine; National Science Center «PI Prokopovich Institute of Beekeeping»

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Standardization and Certification of Agricultural Products

Artem Antoniv, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Postgraduate Student

Department of Technologies of Meat, Fish and Marine Products

Sedat Sevin, Ankara University

PhD, Researcher

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Veterinary Medicine

References

  1. Nikolovska, M. (2021). Orhanizatsiia hromadianskoho suspilstva ta rozvytok liudskoho kapitalu. European Training Foundation, 38.
  2. Orhanizatsii hromadianskoho suspilstva Ukrainy (2017). Reziume doslidzhennia.
  3. Herasina, L. M., Pohribna, V. L., Polishchuk, I. O.; Trebin, M. P. (Ed.) (2015). Politolohichnyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk. Kharkiv: Pravo, 814.
  4. Rekomendatsii shchodo standartiv yakosti ta nalezhnoho vriaduvannia dlia orhanizatsii hromadianskoho suspilstva yak mekhanizmu zmitsnennia doviry (2019). Kyiv: Orhanizatsiia z bezpeky i spivrobitnytstva v Yevropi Koordynator proektiv v Ukraini, 1–13.
  5. Code of Ethics and Conduct for NGOs (2004). World Association of Non-Governmental Organizations, 44. Available at: www.aomonline.org/aom.asp?ID=&page_ID=240
  6. Adrover, K. L.,. Barrera, M. M. (2020). Kerivnytstvo iz vprovadzhennia Standartiv yakosti NUO. Kyiv: Orhanizatsiia z bezpeky i spivrobitnytstva v Yevropi Koordynator proektiv v Ukraini, 206.
  7. Buyse, A. (2018). Squeezing civic space: restrictions on civil society organizations and the linkages with human rights. The International Journal of Human Rights, 22 (8), 966–988. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2018.1492916
  8. Ibrahim, U., Wan-Puteh, S. E. (2018). An overview of civil society organizations’ roles in health project sustainability in Bauchi State, Nigeria. Pan African Medical Journal, 30 (1). doi: https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2018.30.150.15851
  9. Van Rooy, A., Robinson, M. (2020). Out of the ivory tower: civil society and the aid system. Civil society and the aid industry. Routledge, 31–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315071244-3
  10. Rivera-Ferre, M. G. (2018). The resignification process of Agroecology: Competing narratives from governments, civil society and intergovernmental organizations. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 42 (6), 666–685. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2018.1437498
  11. Lambin, E. F., Thorlakson, T. (2018). Sustainability Standards: Interactions Between Private Actors, Civil Society, and Governments. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43 (1), 369–393. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025931
  12. Egholm, L., Heyse, L., Mourey, D. (2019). Civil Society Organizations: the Site of Legitimizing the Common Good – a Literature Review. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31 (1), 1–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00171-y
  13. Korniievskyi, O., Sydorenko, D., Pelivanova, N. et al.; Tyshchenko, Yu., Kaplan, Yu. (Ed.) (2021). Kliuchovi vyklyky dlia rozvytku rozvytku hromadianskoho suspilstva. Stan rozvytku hromadianskoho suspilstva v Ukraini u 2020 rotsi. Kyiv, 116.
  14. Pro hromadski ob’iednannia (2012). Zakon Ukrainy No. 4572-VI. 22.03.2022. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4572-17#Text
  15. NGOs regulating themselves: The NGO quality standards (2006). Uganda, 24.
  16. Quality Standard. Version 5 (2014). Madrid: ADI Servicios Editoriales, 55.
  17. DSTU ISO 9001:2015 (ISO 9001:2015, IDT) (2015). Systemy upravlinnia yakistiu. Available at: https://khoda.gov.ua/image/catalog/files/%209001.pdf
  18. ISO 9001:2015 Quality management systems – Requirements. Available at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9001:ed-5:v1:en
  19. López, C., Martínez, M. (2011). Manual de implantación de la Norma ONG Calidad. ICONG, 202. Available at: https://icong.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Manual_Implantacion_Norma_ONGC1.pdf
  20. Trachenko, L. A. (2018). Important aspects of the formation of quality management systems in the context of the requirement of international standard ISO 9001: 2015. Efektyvna ekonomika, 4, 1–7.
  21. Upravlinnia v neuriadovii orhanizatsii: praktychni porady ta zrazky dokumentiv (administratyvni polityky, protsedury, protsedury, instruktsii) (2011). Kyiv: USAID, 31.
  22. The 2005 MOCAT Assessment of NSDP NGOs (2005). NGO Service Delivery Program. Watertown: NGO Service Delivery Program, 16.
Justification of approaches to development of the standard civil society organization based on international experience

Downloads

Published

2022-10-31

How to Cite

Pylypko, K., Adamchuk, L., Antoniv, A., & Sevin, S. (2022). Justification of approaches to development of the standard civil society organization based on international experience. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 5(2(67), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2022.267575

Issue

Section

Systems and Control Processes: Reports on Research Projects