Social innovations in the company’s strategic goals: peculiarities, classification, efficiency evaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2023.292812Keywords:
management, social innovation, strategic goals, performance evaluation, enterprise, dynamic transformational society, business structureAbstract
The article is devoted to the features, classification and evaluation of the effectiveness of social innovations in the implementation of the company's strategic goals. The object of the study is the process of formation and implementation of social innovations in the company's activities. At the same time, the development of the concept of social innovations from the 19th century to the present is considered in detail. Special attention is paid to the interpretation of social innovations and strategic goals of the company in Ukrainian and foreign economic science. The research problem is the complexity of forming modern classifications and evaluating the effectiveness of social innovations in the company's strategic goals. The essence of the obtained results is the disclosure of the theoretical provisions of social innovations and strategic goals, the determination of approaches and methods for evaluating the effectiveness of social innovations, as well as the role of social innovations as a tool for achieving the strategic goals of the enterprise. In the reasoned conclusions of the study, it is explained that the gradation of the results of the implementation of social innovations at the enterprise depending on the type (personal, economic, image and social) indicates that each of them has both positive and negative features; methods of evaluating the impact of innovations on the company's performance are shown. In particular, the assessment of the effectiveness of social innovations is also important because their implementation requires a lot additional efforts, which shifts the focus and can distract from solving important issues that are often urgent. The state of war, the destruction of the usual approaches to doing business, the loss of qualified management personnel, specialists in various processes does not allow to effectively find and implement innovations in the social, environmental and managerial components. All these aspects are considered in the context of the effective implementation of the company's strategic goals in the conditions of a dynamic transformational society, in which the research results can be used in practice.
References
- Coe, R. D., Wilber, Ch. K. (1985). Capitalism and Democracy: Schumpeter Revisited. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 460.
- Boyko-Boychuk, L. V. (2009). «Social innovation» notion: types of definitions, examples of implementation. Science and Innovations, 3, 94–99.
- Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Available at: https://ssir.org/articles/entry/rediscovering_social_innovation Last access: 29.11.2023
- Wizja 2050. Innowacje społeczne. Podsumowanie prac grupy roboczej w 2013 r. (2013). PWC. Available at: https://www.pwc.pl/pl/doradztwo-csr/wizja-2050/assets/broszura_wizja_2050_pl_innowacje_spoleczne_podsumowanie.pdf Last access: 29.11.2023
- Bui, Yu. V., Melnichenko, L. (2013). Sotsialni innovatsiyi: ikh sutnist ta klasyfikatsiya. Stratehiya pidpryyemstva: zmina paradyhmy upravlinnya ta innovatsiyni rishennya dlya biznesu. Available at: https://www.slideshare.net/alegre380/3-bui Last access: 29.11.2023
- Theron, I. V. (2011). Sotsialni innovatsiyi u protsesakh modernizatsiyi sotsialno-trudovykh vidnosyn. Scientific Works of the Kirovohrad National Technical University, 20 (II), 57–66.
- Zhaldak, G., Simchenko, N. (2012). Klasyfikatsiya innovatsiy ta yikh sotsialnyi pidvyd. Ekonomichnyy analiz, 10 (4), 92–95.
- Shershnyova, Z. E. (2004). Stratehichne upravlinnya. Kyiv: KNEU, 699.
- Nalivayko, A. P., Harashchenko, N. M., Prokhorova, E. V. (2016). Stratehiya pidpryyemstva. Kyiv: KNEU, 485.
- Dees, G., Anderson, B. B., Wei-Skillern, J. (2004). Strategies for spreading social innovations. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 1, 23–32.
- Kostevko, V. I. (2011). Metodolohichni pytannya otsinyuvannya efektyvnosti innovatsiynoyi diyalʹnosti pidpryyemstva. Visnyk Natsionalʹnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika», 698, 66–73.
- Kabachenko, D. V. (2019). Improving methods of efficiency assessment for enterprise development innovative projects. Business Navigator, 2, 63–70.
- Yevtushenko, V. A. (2013). Otsinka korporatyvnoyi sotsialʹnoyi vidpovidalʹnosti: metody, obʹyekty, pokaznyky. Visnyk NTU «KPI». Bulletin of NTU «KPI», 46 (1019), 53–63.
- Buyan, O. A. (2012). Pidkhody do otsinky efektyvnosti korporatyvnoyi sotsialʹnoyi vidpovidalnosti pidpryyemstv v Ukrayini. Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho universytetu. Seriya «Ekonomika», 6, 159–165.
- Mizhnarodnyy Standart «Sotsialʹna vidpovidalnist» (SA8000) (2007). Verkhovna Rada Ukrayiny. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/n0015697-07#Text Last access: 29.11.2023
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Oleksandr Vostriakov, Yevhenii Notevskyi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
