Features of CSR development in various sectors of the economy: case study from Ukraine based on the analytical-hierarchical method

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2026.361128

Keywords:

CSR of enterprises, market environment, working environment, environment, society, analytical-hierarchical method

Abstract

The object of research is the level of development of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in various sectors of the economy. The conducted research solves the problem of the lack of a comprehensive assessment of the level of development of CSR in various sectors of the economy. The research method is the construction of an analytical hierarchical model (AHP) for assessing CSR, taking into account economic, social and environmental aspects. The empirical basis of the research is an expert survey of specialists in the field of management and CSR. The research results were processed using the Expert Choice software. The data show that for enterprises in the IT (0.316) and energy (0.323) industries, the most important aspect of CSR is the working environment (0.383). The latter can be explained by the high level of digital culture, the significant importance of human capital and environmental responsibility. Enterprises of the light, food and machine-building industries received lower weight coefficients (0.104; 0.11 and 0.146, respectively), which is due to the low level of investment in employees, lower interest in environmental initiatives or low participation in social projects. In general, the AHP analysis shows that CSR in Ukraine is formed at the expense of social, labor and public aspects, while the market and financial and economic blocks play a less significant role. The applied structured multi-aspect approach to expert assessment will allow to form priorities of components and elements of CSR in different sectors of the economy. The results can be used by enterprises of different sectors of the economy to form corporate social responsibility policies. The use of the AHP model allows to structure the decision-making process, reduce the level of uncertainty and increase the validity of resource allocation regarding corporate social responsibility.

Author Biographies

Halyna Lema, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Management and International Business

Ihor Oleksiv, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine; University of London, Goldsmiths, United Kingdom; School of Creative Management, London, United Kingdom

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Management and International Business

Viktoriya Kharchuk, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Management and International Business

Roksolana Vilhutska, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Management and International Business

Liliia Mykhailyshyn, Vasyl Stefanyk Carpathian National University

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of International Economic Relations

References

  1. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34 (4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-g
  2. Mosad, M. S. T., Szegedi, K. (2025). Mapping the academic discourse on CSR disclosure in family firms. Discover Sustainability, 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-02342-y
  3. Peng, Y., Zhang, Z. (2026). The roles of lean and corporate social responsibility in acquisitions. Omega, 141, 103483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2025.103483
  4. Ta, H. T. T., Le, O. T. T., Can, D. H. (2025). Stakeholder pressure on the level of corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from Vietnam. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 8 (2), 2026029. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2026029
  5. He, L.-Y., Wang, Y. (2026). Is CSR a leading indicator of corporate restructuring performance? Evidence from explainable machine learning. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 11 (1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2025.12.001
  6. Yin, C., Salmador, M. P., Li, D. (2026). The impact of corporate social responsibility on executive remuneration: A comparative analysis of family and non-family firms. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 22 (1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-025-01147-9
  7. Rodrigues, M., Mendes, L. (2018). Mapping of the literature on social responsibility in the mining industry: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.163
  8. Willness, C. R., Grygoryeva, A. (2026). A systematic review of negative reactions to corporate social responsibility. Human Resource Management Review, 36 (2), 101130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2025.101130
  9. Téllez-Bedoya, C., Almanza-Junco, C., Herrera, J. (2026). Analytic Hierarchy Process-Based Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility Decision-Making in Peacebuilding Contexts. Sustainability, 18 (4), 2151. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18042151
  10. Kirzhetska, M. S., Kirzhetskyy, Y. I., Zelenko, N. M., Zelenko, V. A., Klos, L. Y., Shkoliar, M. V., Gnylianska, L. Y. (2023). Activity-based costing: a practical model of cost calculation in psychiatric hospitals. Wiadomości Lekarskie, 76 (12), 2679–2686. https://doi.org/10.36740/wlek202312118
  11. Moskvyak, Y., Kucher, A., Kniaz, S., Heorhiadi, N., Fedorchak, O. (2025). Construction of a model for forecasting the rationality of financial decisions under the conditions of financial markets digitalization. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (13 (134)), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.325518
  12. Kharchuk, V., Oleksiv, I. (2023). The Intellectual Structure of Sustainable Leadership Studies: Bibliometric Analysis. Advances in Intelligent Systems, Computer Science and Digital Economics IV. Cham: Springer, 430–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24475-9_37
  13. Oleksiv, I., Lema, H., Vankovych, L., Chapran, S. (2025). Analysis of the Relationship Between CSR Elements Applying Isomorphic Distances. Advances in Computer Science for Engineering and Education VII. 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-84228-3_36
  14. Lema, H., Lisovych, T., Oleksiv, I., Kharchuk, V., Shulyar, R., Lema, O. (2025). Influence of External and Internal Factors on Company Activity in War Conditions Applying Expert Integral Evaluation System: A Case Study from Ukraine. Advances in Computer Science for Engineering and Education VII. Cham: Springer, 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-84228-3_37
  15. Kuzmin, O. Y., Oleksiv, I. B., Mykhailyak, G. V. (2014). Integral evaluation of company employees' competence system. Actual Problems of Economics, 5 (155), 506–513.
  16. Chapran, S. (2021). Analysis of methodological approaches to the construction of dynamic systems of investment in information development. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 6 (4 (62)), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2021.248312
  17. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, 287.
  18. Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting (Text with EEA relevance) (2022). European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022L2464&qid=1681303503520
  19. Corporate responsibility (2025). EPAM Systems. Available at: https://www.epam.com/about/who-we-are/corporate-responsibility
  20. Corporate social responsibility report 2024 (2024). SoftServe. Available at: https://www.softserveinc.com/files/csr/softserve-corporate-social-responsibility-report-2024.pdf
  21. Sustainability in action report (2024). DTEK. Available at: https://dtek.com/content/upload/Sustainability_in_Action_report.pdf
Features of CSR development in various sectors of the economy: case study from Ukraine based on the analytical-hierarchical method

Downloads

Published

2026-06-19

How to Cite

Lema, H., Oleksiv, I., Kharchuk, V., Vilhutska, R., & Mykhailyshyn, L. (2026). Features of CSR development in various sectors of the economy: case study from Ukraine based on the analytical-hierarchical method. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 3(4(89), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2026.361128