“Cost-benefit” analysis: defining the expediency of it application in CSR

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.38504

Keywords:

corporate social responsibility, evaluation, cost-benefit analysis

Abstract

This paper provides an introduction to the problem of usage and effectiveness of “cost-benefit” analysis in social responsible activity through worldwide case studies. The main purpose of the paper is to persuade that comparing costs and benefits of social activity change the essences of CSR (corporate social responsibility). We analyzed of case-studies of CSR performance to do it. The cases indicate that in the context of social responsibility the usage of financial valuators in relation to social objects as incentives as well as a “cost-benefit” analysis abolish the very concept of social responsibility.

CSR have to be done taking in accounts specific inputs and output of social activity without using traditional economic utilitarian approach. In the case when the event is economically advantageous to be socially responsible it should have moral value. We states that this method of financial analysis in practice of CSR should abandon We propose during the analysis of any case in CSR proceed from the fact that it was adopted on the basis of "cost-benefit" analysis in a situation of "what if…?". This does not affect the calculation of effectiveness of CSR activity; however it will valuates the moral aspect of the issue.

Author Biographies

Tetiana Botsian, Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University, Veluka Berdichivska str., 40, Zhytomyr, Ukraine, 10008

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associated Professor

Department of Management and Administration

Svitlana Diachek, Zhytomyr State Technological University, Cherniakhovsky str., 103, Zhytomyr, Ukraine, 10005

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associated Professor

Department of Finance and Credit

References

  1. In: Azriliyan, A. N. (1997). Bolshoy ekonomicheskiy slovar. Ed. 2. Mockva: Institut novoy ekonomiki, 864.
  2. Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2009). Сonceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. Available: http://www.fasb.org/jsp/FASB/Page/PreCodSectionPage&cid=1176156317989. Last accessed: November 14, 2014.
  3. Mamedov, О. Y. (2006). Dve sudbyi: stoimost i sobstvennost. Ekonomicheskiy vestnik Rostovskogo universiteta, Т. 4, № 4, 5-10.
  4. Sandel, M. (2013). What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. London: Penguin books, 256.
  5. International Organization for Standardization. (2010). ISO 26000 Social responsibility. Available: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:26000:ed-1:v1:en. Last accessed: November 16, 2014.
  6. Al-Debei, M. M., Avison, D. (2010, May 11). Developing a unified framework of the business model concept. European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 19, № 3, 359–376. doi:10.1057/ejis.2010.21
  7. Stewart, D. W., Zhao, Q. (2000, September). Internet Marketing, Business Models, and Public Policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, Vol. 19, № 2, 287–296. doi:10.1509/jppm.19.2.287.17125
  8. Palmer, K., Oates, W. E., Portney, P. R. (1995, November). Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 9, № 4, 119–132.doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.119
  9. Porter, M., Van der Linder, C. (1995). Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120-134.
  10. Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., Walsh, J. P. (n.d.). Does it Pay to Be Good...And Does it Matter? A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance. SSRN Electronic Journal. Available: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/m-rcbg/papers/seminars/margolis_november_07.pdf. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1866371
  11. Manescu, C., Staricad, C. (2010). Do Corporate Social Responsibility scores explain profitability? A case study on the publishers of the Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes in Economic Implications of Corporate Social Responsibility and Responsible Investments. Sweden: University of Gothenburg. Available: http://www.academia.edu/528708/Do_Corporate_Social_Responsibility_scores_explain_and_predict_firm_profitability_A_case_study_on_the_publishers_of_the_Dow_Jones_Sustainability_Indexes1_2
  12. Tofallis, Ch. (2001). Combining two approaches to efficiency assessment. Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 52, No. 11, 1225-1231. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601231
  13. Commons, J. (1934). Institutional Economics. New York: Macmillan, 200.
  14. Mitchell , W. C. (1937). The Backward Art of Spending Money: and other essays. New York: McGraw-Hill, 268.
  15. Galbraith, J. K. (1973). Economics and the Public Purpose. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 334.
  16. Myrdal, G. (1958). Value in Social Theory: A Selection of Essays on Methodology. New York: Harper, 269.
  17. Coase, Rd. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1-44.
  18. North, D. (1994). Economic Performance through Time. American Economic Review, 84 (3), 359–368
  19. Sosnina, Т. N. (2005). Stoimost: istoriko-metodicheskoe issledovanie. Samara: Samar. gos. aerokosm. un-t, 396.
  20. Marx, К., Engels, F. (1956). Iz rannih proizvedeniy. M.: Politizdat, 587.
  21. One Hundred Eleventh Congress of the United States of America. (2009). Available: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111hr3590enr/pdf/BILLS-111hr3590enr.pdf. Last accessed: January 10, 2015.
  22. Sandel, М. (2013). Chto nelzya kupit za dengi. Moralnyie ogranicheniya cvobodnogo ryinka. Mockva: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 256.
  23. Giné, X., Karlan, D., Zinman, J. (2010, October). Put Your Money Where Your Butt Is: A Commitment Contract for Smoking Cessation. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, Vol. 2, № 4, 213–235. doi:10.1257/app.2.4.213
  24. Miller, S. (2010). Employers Weigh Health Care Strategies A growing number do more to mitigate costs and improve employee health. Available: http://www.shrm.org/hrdisciplines/benefits/Articles/Pages/HealthStrategies.aspx. Last accessed: November 25, 2014.
  25. Kyoto Protocol Fast Facts. (April 8, 2014). Available: http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/26/world/kyoto-protocol-fast-facts/. Last accessed: January 10, 2015.
  26. Trading Platform. Official site of Texas Climate & Carbon Exchange. Available: http://www.tccxchange.com/about/trading-platform/. Last accessed: January 2, 2015
  27. Yin, D. (2013). China's Carbon Emissions Traders Await Offset Demand. Available: http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/pages/dynamic/article.page.php?page_id=9820. Last accessed: November 10, 2014.
  28. Our programme of action to manage climate and carbon risk. Official site of British Petroleum. Available: http://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/sustainability/the-energy-future/climate-change/our-programme-of-action-to-manage-climate-and-carbon-risk.html. Last accessed: January 14, 2015.
  29. Carbon Emissions Calculator. Official site of British Airways. Available: http://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/CarbonOffset/Pages/default.aspx. Last accessed: January 6, 2015.

Downloads

Published

2015-01-29

How to Cite

Botsian, T., & Diachek, S. (2015). “Cost-benefit” analysis: defining the expediency of it application in CSR. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(6(21), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.38504

Issue

Section

Economics and management of enterprise (by the type of economic activity)