Improving the measurement efficiency of marine ship-borne receivers of global navigation satellite systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2025.337041

Keywords:

navigation safety, AIS, positioning accuracy, differential mode, NMEA

Abstract

Global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) play a decisive role in maritime navigation. The differential mode of operation of ship-based GNSS receivers using coordinate corrections allows to significantly increase the accuracy of positioning of a seagoing vessel compared to the autonomous mode. The object of the study was marine GNSS receivers capable of operating in differential mode.

This research examines the problems of reliably determining the actual operating mode of a shipboard GNSS receiver (autonomous or differential). It outlines the risks associated with the ambiguity and unreliability of standard differential mode indicators (flags posMode = D, Fix Quality = 2). This leads to misinterpretation of the accuracy status by related navigation systems, in particular, the Automatic Identification System (AIS), and poses a threat to maritime safety.

It has been experimentally proven that outdated receiver models can falsely indicate operation in differential mode, relying solely on user settings rather than the actual receipt and application of corrections. It has been established that modern receivers solve this problem but create a new level of complexity by separating the concepts of “accuracy” and “integrity” of the navigation solution. They can produce a highly accurate position while simultaneously flagging it as unreliable (NavStatus flag = V) if a faulty satellite is detected. A systemic conflict between the requirements of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standards regarding high-accuracy criteria for AIS has been identified.

It has been established that inaccurate mode indications in outdated equipment are related to the particularities of its software logic, which links the mode flag to the setting rather than to the availability of data. The behavior of modern receivers is explained by the implementation of advanced integrity control algorithms (RAIM) and the logic of new standards (in particular, IEC 61108-7), which require reporting the loss of confidence in data.

The research results can be used by developers of marine equipment (AIS, ECDIS) to create comprehensive GNSS data analysis algorithms that take into account a set of indicators. International organizations (IMO, ITU) can use them to harmonize standards. Ship operators and technical specialists can use these results to form a correct understanding of the limitations of standard indicators and the need for a comprehensive assessment of the status of the GNSS receiver.

Author Biographies

Viktor Konovets, Naval Institute National University "Odessa Maritime Academy"

PhD, Senior Researcher

Vitalii Kuzmenko, Naval Institute National University "Odessa Maritime Academy"

PhD

Eduard Pleshko, Specialized Military Prosecutor's Office

PhD

Oleksandr Shyshkin, National University “Odessa Maritime Academy”

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Electronic Complexes of Shipping

References

  1. Resolution MSC.112(73): Adoption of the Revised Performance Standards for Shipborne Global Positioning System (GPS) Receiver Equipment (2000). Available at: https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MSCResolutions/MSC.112(73).pdf
  2. Resolution A.915(22): Revised Maritime Policy and Requirements for a Future Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) (2001). Available at: https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/AssemblyDocuments/A.915(22).pdf
  3. Resolution A.1046(27): World-wide radionavigation system (2011). Available at: https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/AssemblyDocuments/A.1046(27).pdf
  4. IHO Standards for Hydrographic Surveys (Publication S-44) (2020). Available at: https://iho.int/uploads/user/pubs/standards/s-44/S-44_Edition_6.1.0.pdf
  5. Tabti, L. (2025). Evaluation and Comparison of the Accuracy and Integrity of GPS Single-Point Positioning Using EGNOS Corrections. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 53 (8), 2577–2590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-025-02168-1
  6. Pogurelskiy, O., Ostroumov, I., Znakovska, Y., Holubnychyi, O., Zaliskyi, M., Voliansky, R. et al. (2024). Estimation Positioning Accuracy for GPS/EGNOS Mode in Ukraine Region. 2024 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Trends in Radioelectronics, Telecommunications and Computer Engineering (TCSET), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcset64720.2024.10755700
  7. Specht, C., Pawelski, J., Smolarek, L., Specht, M., Dabrowski, P. (2018). Assessment of the Positioning Accuracy of DGPS and EGNOS Systems in the Bay of Gdansk using Maritime Dynamic Measurements. Journal of Navigation, 72 (3), 575–587. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0373463318000838
  8. RTCM 10402.3, RTCM Recommended Standards for Differential GNSS Service, Version 2.3 (2001). Available at: https://rtcm.myshopify.com/products/rtcm-10402-3-rtcm-recommended-standards-for-differential-gnss-global-navigation-satellite-systems-service-version-2-3-with-amendment-1-may-21-2010?_pos=2&_sid=64d21e781&_ss=r
  9. What is SBAS? (2024). European Union Agency for the Space Programme. Available at: https://www.euspa.europa.eu/eu-space-programme/egnos/what-sbas
  10. EGNOS Open Service (OS) Quarterly Performance Report: Quarter 4 (2023). European Union Agency for the Space Programme. Available at: https://www.gsc-europa.eu/sites/default/files/sites/all/files/Galileo-OS-Quarterly-Performance_Report-Q4-2023.pdf
  11. GPS Accuracy (2022). U.S. Government. Available at: https://www.gps.gov/systems/gps/performance/accuracy/
  12. Januszewski, J. (2014). Nominal and Real Accuracy of the GPS Position Indicated by Different Maritime Receivers in Different Modes. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 8 (1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.08.01.01
  13. Specht, C. (2022). Maritime DGPS System Positioning Accuracy as a Function of the HDOP in the Context of Hydrographic Survey Performance. Remote Sensing, 15 (1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010010
  14. Alissa, S., HÁkansson, M., Henkel, P., Mittmann, U., Huffmeier, J., Rylander, R. (2021). Low Bandwidth Network-RTK Correction Dissemination for High Accuracy Maritime Navigation. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 15 (1), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.15.01.17
  15. IEC 61108-1: 2003 Maritime navigation and radiocommunication equipment and systems – Global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) – Part 1: Global positioning system (GPS) – Receiver equipment – Performance standards, methods of testing and required test results (2003). IEC. Available at: https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/4515
  16. User Manual SPR/DSPR-1400. Samyung ENC. Available at: https://www.samyungenc.com/eng/view.do?no=148&bunryuSeq=25&prdSeq=109&pageIndex=1&pgMode=show
  17. IEC 61162-1:2024 Maritime navigation and radiocommunication equipment and systems – Digital interfaces – Part 1: Single talker and multiple listeners (2024). IEC. Available at: https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/72729
  18. IEC 61108-7:2024 Maritime navigation and radiocommunication equipment and systems – Global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) – Part 7: Shipborne SBAS receiver L1 – Performance requirements, methods of testing and required test results (2024). IEC. Available at: https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/68696
  19. Tegedor, J., Fortuny, J., Fernandez, G., Lacarra, E., Canestri, E., Porfili, S., Gioia, C. (2025). IEC-61108-7 SBAS Standard for Shipborne Receivers: Preliminary Testing Validation Activities. European Navigation Conference 2024, 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025088048
  20. NEO-F10N Data sheet. Available at: https://content.u-blox.com/sites/default/files/documents/NEO-F10N_DataSheet_UBX-23002117.pdf
  21. u-blox F10/M10 SPG 5.10 (2023). Interface Description. Available at: https://content.u-blox.com/sites/default/files/u-blox-M10-SPG-5.10_InterfaceDescription_UBX-21035062.pdf
  22. GnssToolKit3-binaries. GitHub. Available at: https://github.com/zxcwhale/GnssToolKit3-binaries
  23. ZED-F9P-04B (2024). Data sheet. Available at: https://content.u-blox.com/sites/default/files/ZED-F9P-04B_DataSheet_UBX-21044850.pdf
  24. Recommendation M.1371-5 (02/2014): Technical characteristics for an automatic identification system using time-division multiple access in the VHF maritime mobile frequency band (2014). Available at: https://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-r/rec/m/R-REC-M.1371-5-201402-I!!PDF-E.pdf
  25. IEC 61993-2:2018: Maritime navigation and radiocommunication equipment and systems – Automatic identification systems (AIS) – Part 2: Class A shipborne equipment of the automatic identification system (AIS) – Operational and performance requirements, methods of test and required test results (2018). IEC. Available at: https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/34277
Improving the measurement efficiency of marine ship-borne receivers of global navigation satellite systems

Downloads

Published

2025-08-30

How to Cite

Hlynianiuk, V., Konovets, V., Kuzmenko, V., Pleshko, E., Rudenskyi, R., & Shyshkin, O. (2025). Improving the measurement efficiency of marine ship-borne receivers of global navigation satellite systems. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(1(84), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2025.337041

Issue

Section

Electrical Engineering and Industrial Electronics