Forecasting postoperative complications of transurethral resection of prostate in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Authors

  • S.P. Pasechnikov National Medical University A.A. Bogomolets, Ukraine
  • Y.M. Klymenko National Medical University A.A. Bogomolets, Ukraine
  • Abdulfatah Ahmed Moallim National Medical University A.A. Bogomolets, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-5279.22.3.2018.143278

Keywords:

prostate transurethral resection, benign prostatic hyperplasia, postoperative complications, risk factors, prognostic card

Abstract

The work focuses on unfavorable factors with well-grounded features that influence the development of postoperative complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). 266 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were analyzed, including 141 cases in urgent and 125 planned procedures, which had undergone TURP in the Urological departments of the Oleksandrivka Clinical Hospital in Kyiv in 2015–2016. There was determined informative value (in points) of each sign (27, included in 13 factors), as well as the significance of relative risk. Based on their analytical and synthetic analysis, the prognostic cards for outpatient-polyclinic and in-patient stages of providing medical care to contingents are compiled. The principle of distribution of patients with BPH is proposed for two groups of risk (minimum and maximum). Thus, for clinical urology, a convenient, cost-effective tool for taking appropriate action at certain stages of medical care and choosing the optimal timing for surgical treatment is offered. The essence of the unified approach is in summarizing the existing features in the patient at the time of the survey, the magnitude of which correlates with the objectified limit values for each group, while an algorithm of action is presented.

References

Аляев Ю.Г., Винаров А.З., Локшин К.Л., Спивак Л.Г. Выбор метода лечения больных гипер-плазией предстательной железы. – Москва: Клиника урологии ММА им. И.М.Сеченова, 2005:59.

Бабич П.Н., Чубенко А.В, Лапач С.Н. Применение современных статистических методов в практике клинических исследований. Сообщение третье. Отношение шансов: понятие, вычисление и интерпретация // Український медичний часопис. – 2005;2(46):113–119.

Волков Д.Ю., Артифексов С.Б., Артифексова А.А. Пути профилактики ранних послеоперационных осложнений после трансуретральной резекции простаты: экспериментальное исследование // Урология. – 2011;1:44–46.

Давыдов Д.С., Цариченко Д.Г., Безруков Е.А., Суханов Р.Б. и др. Осложнения гольмиевой лазерной энуклеации гиперплазии предстательной железы // Урология. – 2018;1:42–47.

Когут В.В. Обµрунтування вибору методу ендоскопічного хірургічного лікування хворих на ДГПЗ // Здоровье мужчины. – 2013;1:138–142.

Кузьменко В.В., Кочетов М.В., Семенов Б.В. Доброкачественная гиперплазия предстательной железы: Монография. – Воронеж: Новый взгляд, 2008:141

Пасєчніков С.П. Принципи класифікації, діагностики та лікування доброякісної гіперплазії передміхурової залози // Медичні аспекти здоров’я чоловіків. – 2018;1(28):36–41.

Федорук О.С., Владиченко К.А. Післяопераційні ускладнення трансуретральної резекції доброякісної гіперплазії простати // Буковинський мед. вісник. – 2006;10(1):153–155.

Ahyai S.A. et al. Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement // Eur. Urol. – 2010;58:384–397.

Charles Е., Edmiston Jr., Candace J. Krepel, Patti J. Wilson et al. Инновационные стратегии снижения риска хирургической раневой инфекции // Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. – 2012;3:79–88.

Clavien P.A., Barkun J., de Oliveira M.L, Vauthey J.N., Dindo D. et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience // Ann. Surg. – 2009;250(2):187–196.

Gobermado M., Valdes L., Alos J.I. et al. Antimicrobal susceptibility of clinical Escherihia coli isolates from uncomplicated cystitis in women over a 1-year period in Spain // Rev. Esp. Quimiotherap. – 2007;20:68–75.

Forthofer R.N., Lee E.S., Hernandez М. Biostatistics: A Guide to Design, Analysis, and Discovery. – Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press, 2007:502.

Nicoll L.E. Catheter-related urinary tract infection // Drugs Aging. – 2005;22:627–639.

Pisco J.M., Rio Tinto H., Campos Pinheiro L., Bilhim T. et al. Embolization of prostatic arteries as treatment of moderate to severe lower urinary symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign hyperplasia: results of short- and mid-term follow-up // Eur. Radiol. – 2013;23(9):2573–2574.

Schroeck FR., Hollingsworth J.M., Kaufman S.R. et al. Population based trends in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia // J. Urology. – 2012;188:1837–1841.

Published

2018-09-27

Issue

Section

Andrology