Mitrofanov’s principle in the practice of pediatric urologist

Authors

  • V.A. Dihtiar Municipal Institution «Dnipropetrovsk Regional Childrens Clinical Hospital»; State Establishment «Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of Health Ministry of Ukraine», Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3182-2512
  • L.M. Kharitoniuk Municipal Institution «Dnipropetrovsk Regional Childrens Clinical Hospital»; State Establishment «Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of Health Ministry of Ukraine», Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9893-1177
  • M.V. Boiko Municipal Institution «Dnipropetrovsk Regional Childrens Clinical Hospital»; State Establishment «Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of Health Ministry of Ukraine», Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5199-5384
  • O.A. Ostrovska Municipal Institution «Dnipropetrovsk Regional Childrens Clinical Hospital»; State Establishment «Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of Health Ministry of Ukraine», Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3471-2714
  • A.V. Obertynskyi Municipal Institution «Dnipropetrovsk Regional Childrens Clinical Hospital»; State Establishment «Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of Health Ministry of Ukraine», Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2887-604X
  • D.H. Vernihora Municipal Institution «Dnipropetrovsk Regional Childrens Clinical Hospital»; State Establishment «Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of Health Ministry of Ukraine», Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6159-0866

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-5279.24.4.2020.224416

Abstract

Introduction. Management of neurogenic bladder is quite serious problem in child urologist practice. The key place for improvement quality of life is choice adequate way to restore the reservoir and evacuation function of the bladder. Treatment tactics of urinary incontinence is significantly changed by principle of Mitroffanof. Positive results are observed in 90% cases. Objective: Improving the tactics of treatment at children with severe urological pathology and show the benefits of the Mitroffanof principle. Materials and methods: We made retrospective analyze of six cases procedure Mitroffanof in our clinic from 2010 to 2020 years. Mitroffanof’s procedure was performed on patients with the following pathologies: neurogenic bladder dysfunction, bladder exstrophy, total epispadias of the penis with bladder neck insufficiency and in one case multiple genius defects with anorectal malformation. Results: Аppendix was the source of conduit in all cases. Appendix entered to belly button in one case and in other cases appendix entered to right iliac region. The cosmetic result was better in the stoma brought to the navel. Bladder part of stoma implanted with anti - reflux mechanism in posterior wall of bladder in all cases. The cutaneous part of the appendicostomy is formed by VQ - flap plastics in 5 cases, in one case formed by U- plastic. We had two complications. First is stenosis of cutaneous part of stoma, second was formed of erroneous pass in cutaneous part of stoma. Conclusions: Mitroffanof principle becomes a good alternative way of derivation urine from bladder in patients with heavy urological pathology and improve their quality of life. Although complications are quite common in patients with appendicostomy, most of them can be corrected conservatively, endoscopically or surgically.

References

Berkowitz J., North A., Tripp R., Gearhart J., Lakshmanan Y. Mitrofanoff continent catheterizable conduits: Top down or bottom up? Journal Of Pediatric Urology. 2009. Vol. 5(2). P. 122–125. Doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.11.003.

Cain M., Casale A., King S., Rink R. Appendicovesicostomy and newer alternatives for the mitrofanoff procedure: results in the last 100 patients at riley children2 s hospital. Journal Of Urology. 1999. Vol. 162(5). P. 1749–1752. Doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68230-4.

De Ganck J., Everaert K., Van Laecke E., Oosterlinck W., Hoebeke P. A high easy-to-treat complication rate is the price for a continent stoma. BJU International. 2002. Vol. 90(3). P. 240–243. Doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2002.02805.x.

Duckett J., Snyder H. Continent Urinary Diversion: Variations on the Mitrofanoff Principle. Journal Of Urology. 1986. Vol. 136. P. 58–62. Doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)44725-2.

Kaefer M., Retik A. The mitrofanoff principle in continent urinary reconstruction. Urologic Clinics Of North America. 1997. Vol. 24(4). P. 795–811. Doi: 10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70421-3.

Lapides J., Diokno A., Silber S., Lowe B. Clean, Intermittent Self-Catheterization In The Treatment Of Urinary Tract Disease. The Journal Of Urology. 1972. Vol. 107(3). P. 458–461. Doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)61055-3.

Mitrofanoff P. Cystostomie continente transappendiculaire dans le traitement des vessies neuroiogiques. Chir. pediatr. 1980. Vol. 21, No. 1. P. 297–305.

Snodgrass W., Elmore J., Adams R. Bladder Neck Sling and Appendicovesicostomy Without Augmentation for Neurogenic Incontinence in Children. Journal Of Urology. 2007. Vol. 177(4). P. 1510–1515. Doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.080.

Sinha S., Sen S., Chacko J., Karl S., & Mathai, J. Use of the Mitrofanoff principle in urinary tract reconstruction: Experience with 122 children. Journal Of Indian Association Of Pediatric Surgeons. 2006. Vol. 11(4). P. 218. Doi: 10.4103/0971-9261.29604.

Published

2021-02-04

Issue

Section

Сhildren’s urology