PROBLEMS OF THE USE OF SYNTACTIC UNITS IN COMMUNICATIVE STRATEGIES

Автор(и)

  • Kulzat Sadirova
  • Zhanna Tektigul
  • Akmaral Kuzdybajeva
  • Gulmira Kushkarova
  • Raushan Zhazykova
  • Munir Karabaev

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2018.171879

Ключові слова:

speech strategy, speech tactics, choice of language units, communicative norms.

Анотація

Abstract. The article reveals the problems of the use of syntactic units while implementing communicative strategies since the study of the speech strategy is an urgent issue in many academic fields. Broadly speaking, the speech strategy comprises planning of the speech communication process in specific conditions depending on the communicant’s individual type. Apart from it, the research analyses the influence of the national culture communication norms on the choice of syntactic units in the process of the speech strategy and tactics. Kazakh interrogative sentences are analyzed as language material. The urgency of the research is caused by the increasing interest in the language and culture interaction, strengthening of cross-cultural contacts, the necessity of understanding of axiological and speech
and behavioral peculiarities of communication for various communities. The purpose of this work is the research of ethnocultural peculiarities of the creation of speech strategy and speech tactics in the process of implementation of communicative tasks. The scientific novelty of the research consists in the study of the communicative strategy and tactics in the Kazakh language as up to the present moment there are no fundamental scientific works on the study of this language phenomenon in the Kazakh linguistics
Keywords: speech strategy, speech tactics, choice of language units, communicative norms.

Посилання

Ali Zangoei, Esmaeel Nourmohammadi, Ali Derakhshan (2014). ‘The Effect of Consciousness-Raising Listening Prompts on the Development of the Speech Act of Apology in an Iranian EFL Context’. SAGE Open.

;4(2) DOI 10.1177/2158244014531770

Long, M. H. (1983). ‘Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible

input’. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.126

ttps://academic.oup.com/applij/articleabstract/4/2/126/167518?redirectedFrom=fulltext

Milevskaya T. V. (2015) ‘Proper Names and Their Functions in the Text Coherency Formation (at the

Material of the Novels “The Twelve Chairs” and “The Little Golden Calf” by I. Ilf and E. Petrov)’. Vestnik

Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 2. Âzykoznanie. 2015;29(5):114-119 DOI

15688/jvolsu2.2015.5.13https://doaj.org/article/000145ec1a0b4cc0a3489e72a5bbad45

Karabaev M.I., Sadirova K.K., Tektigul Zh.O., Zhuminova A.B., Terekova F.E. (2018) ‘The Conversion

Of Syntactic Units Into Bashkir And Kazakh Words’. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods. Vol. 8, Issue 5,

May, 2018, рр. 112-121.

Ryabova M. (2015) ‘Politeness Strategy in Everyday Communication’. Procedia - Social and Behavioral

Sciences, 206, 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.033

Viviane Seyranian (2014). ‘Social identity framing communication strategies for mobilizing social change’.

The Leadership Quarterly Volume 25, Issue 3, June 2014, Pages 468-486 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.013

Parshin O.N. (1996). ‘Theoretical revolutions and a methodological mutiny in XX century linguistics’

[Linguistics Questions] 1996. pp. 23-29.

Uali N.(2011). ‘Turmystyk discurstyn formaldy kommunikativtyk erekshelikteri’. "Diskurs teoriyasynyn

ozekti maseleleri" khalyqaralyk gylymi konferentsia materialderynyn zhinagy. Aktobe, 2011. pp. 146-158.

Omir R.(2002). ‘Zhay soilem sintaksisi’. Almaty.

Baytursynov A. (2002). ‘Til tagylymy’. Almaty.

Goikhman O.J., Nadeina T.M. (2008) “Speech communication”: textbook. Moscow.

Issers O.S. (1999) Communicative strategies and tactics of Russian speech. Omsk.

Klyuev E.V. (2002) Speech communication: Success of speech interaction. Moscow.

Makarov M. L. (2003) ‘Fundamentals of discourse theory’. Moscow.

Skovorodnikov A.P. (2004) ‘On the need to distinguish between the concepts of “rhetorical technique”,

“stylistic figure”, “speech tactics”, “speech genre” in the practice of terminological lexicography’. Smolensk.

Trufanova V.Ya. (2000). A way to social interaction (2000): Intensive. course of speech adaptation. Moscow.

Formanovskaya N.I. (2005). ’Culture of communication and speech etiquette'. Moscow.

Franco, Johann Pirela Morillo Yamely Almarza, and Nelson Javier Pulido Daza. "Proyección social en

Sistemas de Información, Bibliotecología y Archivística. Balance y propuesta." Opción 34.86 (2018): 696-730.

Abbas, M., & Đorić, D. (2010). Common fixed point theorem for four mappings satisfying generalized weak

contractive condition. Filomat, 24(2), 1-10.

##submission.downloads##

Номер

Розділ

Мистецтвознавство