Fostering creative language skills within PISA standards: bridging secondary school and university

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2663-0303.2025.1.01

Keywords:

creativity in language use, PISA monitoring, educational unit, criteria and objects of assessment

Abstract

Background. Following the publication of the National Report on PISA results 2022 – which for the first time measured the level of creative thinking among Ukrainian adolescents – language teachers have renewed the discussion on how to teach and assess creativity in spoken language. There is a broad consensus that this is not only a school-level issue, but also a responsibility extending beyond schools to include universities that train future language teachers.

The aim is to present and discuss the results of an experimental training for university students majoring in language education. The objectives of the article are to structure the educational unit, analyse students' reflections generated through collective creative text production based on the PISA standard, and establish criteria and objectives for assessing creativity in language use among secondary school students, drawing on university students' training experiences.

Method. The research was based on the methodological principles outlined by Ellis, Guilford and Jones, using the LCS-15 model (Rački, Shen). The training was organized around the educational unit "Developing сreativity in language use" and focused on several key areas: analyzing creativity as a personal capacity manifested in speech; proposing criteria and objects of assessment for a scale measuring creativity in language use according to PISA-monitoring standards; and piloting students' creative text production alongside their methodological recommendations for fostering creativity in the speech of secondary school students. Fourteen master's program students specializing in teaching Ukrainian and English participated in the experimental training at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.

Results and discussion. In a series of classroom discussions, students critically examined the strengths and limitations of PISA assessments and explored potential correlations between spoken creativity and factors such as emotional intelligence, critical thinking, and multiple forms of literacy (linguistic, informational, media, and ecological). Their engagement in a PISA-style collaborative storytelling task using symbolic dice served as a catalyst for reflection on the theme "PISA Monitoring: Methodologies and Approaches to Stimulating Spoken Creativity." The discussion helped identify gaps in language education, particularly those contributing to students' underperformance in PISA-aligned speech tasks. Evaluation of the structured learning module revealed high student satisfaction, with 12 of 14 participants rating it as highly effective. Survey responses further indicated students' professional awareness of the challenges in developing spoken creativity and their perceived responsibility in addressing them. Key criteria and assessment targets for evaluating spoken creativity include: originality and novelty of ideas, linguistic proficiency and the ability to experiment with language forms and style, dialogic quality, structural coherence, and the integration of textual elements.

Author Biographies

Olesia Liubashenko, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

PhD, DSc in Education, Full Professor,
Department for Teaching Methodology of Ukrainian and Foreign Languages and Literatures

Anastasiia Zakhariia, National Taras Shevchenko University of Kyiv

student of the master's program "Theory of education and teaching methodology of Ukrainian language, literature, and a foreign language in professionally oriented School"

Daria Perlovska, National Taras Shevchenko University of Kyiv

student of the master’s program "Theory of education and teaching methodology of Ukrainian language, literature, and a foreign language in professionally oriented School"

References

Ellis, R. (2015). Creativity and language learning. In R. H. Jones & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Creativity in language teaching: Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 32–48). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315730936-3

Falshchynska, Y., & Mahdenko, I. (2024). Etapy formuvannya kreatyvnoho monolohichnoho movlennya u starshoklasnykiv: Vid ideyi do realizatsiyi [Stages of developing creative monologic speech among high school students: From idea to implementation]. Journal of Cross-Cultural Education, 3, 54–65. https://vspu.net/jcrosscultural/index.php/journal/article/view/1

Grey, S., & Morris, P. (2024). Capturing the spark: PISA, twenty-first century skills and the reconstruction of creativity. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 22(2), 156-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2022.2100981

Guilford, J. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487

Herasymenko, E. M. (2019, October 8). Linguistic creativity as an integral component of a creative personality [Linhvistychna kreatyvnist yak nevidyemnyy skladnyk kreatyvnoyi osobystosti] [Conference Proceedings]. The 2nd All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference: Topical Issues of Modern Philology and Methods of Language Teaching in Universities: (pp. 129–133). Kharkiv. Ukraine. https://repository.hneu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/23072

Jones, R. H. (2020). Creativity in language learning and teaching: Translingual practices and transcultural identities. Applied Linguistics Review, 11(4), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev2018-0114

Lisova, T., Tereshchenko, V., Bychko, H., Mazorchuk, M., Bondarenko, H., & Vakulenko, T. (2024). Creative Thinking: National Report on the Results of the International PISA-2022 Educational Assessment Study. Ukrainian Center for Educational Quality Assessment. https://pisa.testportal.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Naczionalnyj-zvit-izkreatyvnogo-myslennya.pdf

Liubashenko, O., & Drahinda, O. (2024). Acts of creativity in oral and written language teaching in secondary school: a handbook review. Ars Linguodidacticae, 14(2), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.17721/2663-0303.2024.2.06

Marashi, H., & Khatami, H. (2017). Using cooperative learning to boost creativity and motivation in language learning. Journal of Language and Translation, 7(1), 43-58.

Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (2023). Are Ukrainian 15-year-olds creative? Presentation of the national PISA-2022 report. https://mon.gov.ua/news/chy-kreatyvni-ukrainski-15-richni-pidlitky-prezentovano-natsionalnyi-zvit-pisa2022

O'Neil, H. F., Abedi, J., & Spielberger, C. D. (1994). Reliability and validity of a newly constructed multiple-choice creativity instrument. Journal of Creative Behavior, 28(3), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0901_8

Ordina, L. L. (2024). Formuvannya kreatyvnoyi kompetentnosti studentiv u zakladi vyshchoyi osvity [Formation of students' creative competence in higher education institutions] [Conference Proceedings]. International Scientific and Practical Conference. Agricultural Education and Science: Achievements, Role, and Development Factors(pp. 256–259). Bila Tserkva, Ukraine. https://rep.btsau.edu.ua/bitstream/BNAU/12713/1/Formuvannia_krea.pdf

Pasynok, V. H. (2019). Kreatyvnist ta tvorchist dyskursyvnoyi osobystosti pedahoha [Creativity and discursive personality development of a teacher]. Bulletin of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Foreign Philology. Methods of Teaching Foreign Languages, 89, 46–51. https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-8877-2019-89-07

Pont-Niclòs, I., Echegoyen-Sanz, Y., & MartínEzpeleta, A. (2024). Assessing the linguistic creativity domain of last-year compulsory secondary school students. Education Sciences, 14(2), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020153

Rački, G., Hlebec, V., & Musek, J. (2015). Linguistic creativity: Development and validation of the linguistic creativity scale (LCS-15). Creativity Research Journal, 27(3), 314–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.1063967

Richards, J. C. (2015). Creativity and language teaching. In R. H. Jones & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Creativity in language teaching: Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 3–15). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315730936-1

Shen, W. (2021). An empirical study on the assessment of English writing creativity in college students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(3), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1103.03

Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Scholastic Testing Service

Published

2025-05-27

How to Cite

Liubashenko, O., Zakhariia, A., & Perlovska, D. (2025). Fostering creative language skills within PISA standards: bridging secondary school and university. Ars Linguodidacticae, (15(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.17721/2663-0303.2025.1.01

Issue

Section

FUTURE DIRECTIONS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING IN SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES