Fostering creative language skills within PISA standards: bridging secondary school and university
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/2663-0303.2025.1.01Keywords:
creativity in language use, PISA monitoring, educational unit, criteria and objects of assessmentAbstract
Background. Following the publication of the National Report on PISA results 2022 – which for the first time measured the level of creative thinking among Ukrainian adolescents – language teachers have renewed the discussion on how to teach and assess creativity in spoken language. There is a broad consensus that this is not only a school-level issue, but also a responsibility extending beyond schools to include universities that train future language teachers.
The aim is to present and discuss the results of an experimental training for university students majoring in language education. The objectives of the article are to structure the educational unit, analyse students' reflections generated through collective creative text production based on the PISA standard, and establish criteria and objectives for assessing creativity in language use among secondary school students, drawing on university students' training experiences.
Method. The research was based on the methodological principles outlined by Ellis, Guilford and Jones, using the LCS-15 model (Rački, Shen). The training was organized around the educational unit "Developing сreativity in language use" and focused on several key areas: analyzing creativity as a personal capacity manifested in speech; proposing criteria and objects of assessment for a scale measuring creativity in language use according to PISA-monitoring standards; and piloting students' creative text production alongside their methodological recommendations for fostering creativity in the speech of secondary school students. Fourteen master's program students specializing in teaching Ukrainian and English participated in the experimental training at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.
Results and discussion. In a series of classroom discussions, students critically examined the strengths and limitations of PISA assessments and explored potential correlations between spoken creativity and factors such as emotional intelligence, critical thinking, and multiple forms of literacy (linguistic, informational, media, and ecological). Their engagement in a PISA-style collaborative storytelling task using symbolic dice served as a catalyst for reflection on the theme "PISA Monitoring: Methodologies and Approaches to Stimulating Spoken Creativity." The discussion helped identify gaps in language education, particularly those contributing to students' underperformance in PISA-aligned speech tasks. Evaluation of the structured learning module revealed high student satisfaction, with 12 of 14 participants rating it as highly effective. Survey responses further indicated students' professional awareness of the challenges in developing spoken creativity and their perceived responsibility in addressing them. Key criteria and assessment targets for evaluating spoken creativity include: originality and novelty of ideas, linguistic proficiency and the ability to experiment with language forms and style, dialogic quality, structural coherence, and the integration of textual elements.
References
Ellis, R. (2015). Creativity and language learning. In R. H. Jones & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Creativity in language teaching: Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 32–48). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315730936-3
Falshchynska, Y., & Mahdenko, I. (2024). Etapy formuvannya kreatyvnoho monolohichnoho movlennya u starshoklasnykiv: Vid ideyi do realizatsiyi [Stages of developing creative monologic speech among high school students: From idea to implementation]. Journal of Cross-Cultural Education, 3, 54–65. https://vspu.net/jcrosscultural/index.php/journal/article/view/1
Grey, S., & Morris, P. (2024). Capturing the spark: PISA, twenty-first century skills and the reconstruction of creativity. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 22(2), 156-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2022.2100981
Guilford, J. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
Herasymenko, E. M. (2019, October 8). Linguistic creativity as an integral component of a creative personality [Linhvistychna kreatyvnist yak nevidyemnyy skladnyk kreatyvnoyi osobystosti] [Conference Proceedings]. The 2nd All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference: Topical Issues of Modern Philology and Methods of Language Teaching in Universities: (pp. 129–133). Kharkiv. Ukraine. https://repository.hneu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/23072
Jones, R. H. (2020). Creativity in language learning and teaching: Translingual practices and transcultural identities. Applied Linguistics Review, 11(4), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev2018-0114
Lisova, T., Tereshchenko, V., Bychko, H., Mazorchuk, M., Bondarenko, H., & Vakulenko, T. (2024). Creative Thinking: National Report on the Results of the International PISA-2022 Educational Assessment Study. Ukrainian Center for Educational Quality Assessment. https://pisa.testportal.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Naczionalnyj-zvit-izkreatyvnogo-myslennya.pdf
Liubashenko, O., & Drahinda, O. (2024). Acts of creativity in oral and written language teaching in secondary school: a handbook review. Ars Linguodidacticae, 14(2), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.17721/2663-0303.2024.2.06
Marashi, H., & Khatami, H. (2017). Using cooperative learning to boost creativity and motivation in language learning. Journal of Language and Translation, 7(1), 43-58.
Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (2023). Are Ukrainian 15-year-olds creative? Presentation of the national PISA-2022 report. https://mon.gov.ua/news/chy-kreatyvni-ukrainski-15-richni-pidlitky-prezentovano-natsionalnyi-zvit-pisa2022
O'Neil, H. F., Abedi, J., & Spielberger, C. D. (1994). Reliability and validity of a newly constructed multiple-choice creativity instrument. Journal of Creative Behavior, 28(3), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0901_8
Ordina, L. L. (2024). Formuvannya kreatyvnoyi kompetentnosti studentiv u zakladi vyshchoyi osvity [Formation of students' creative competence in higher education institutions] [Conference Proceedings]. International Scientific and Practical Conference. Agricultural Education and Science: Achievements, Role, and Development Factors(pp. 256–259). Bila Tserkva, Ukraine. https://rep.btsau.edu.ua/bitstream/BNAU/12713/1/Formuvannia_krea.pdf
Pasynok, V. H. (2019). Kreatyvnist ta tvorchist dyskursyvnoyi osobystosti pedahoha [Creativity and discursive personality development of a teacher]. Bulletin of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Foreign Philology. Methods of Teaching Foreign Languages, 89, 46–51. https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-8877-2019-89-07
Pont-Niclòs, I., Echegoyen-Sanz, Y., & MartínEzpeleta, A. (2024). Assessing the linguistic creativity domain of last-year compulsory secondary school students. Education Sciences, 14(2), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020153
Rački, G., Hlebec, V., & Musek, J. (2015). Linguistic creativity: Development and validation of the linguistic creativity scale (LCS-15). Creativity Research Journal, 27(3), 314–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.1063967
Richards, J. C. (2015). Creativity and language teaching. In R. H. Jones & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Creativity in language teaching: Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 3–15). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315730936-1
Shen, W. (2021). An empirical study on the assessment of English writing creativity in college students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(3), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1103.03
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Scholastic Testing Service
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright policy according to the terms of the license: Creative Commons "Attribution-NonCommercial" 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Authors who publish their articles in "Ars Linguodidacticae" (Open Access Journal) retain the following rights:
- The authors retain the copyright of their article and grant the Ars Linguodidacticae journal the right to first publish the manuscript of their article under the Creative Commons (CC BY-NC 4.0) Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published work with mandatory reference to the author of the original work and first original publication in the Ars Linguodidacticae journal. An indication of the retention of the copyright of the work is provided on the title page of the article.
- The authors reserve the right to enter into separate contracts for the non-exclusive distribution of their article as published in Ars Linguodidacticae (e.g., placing the article in electronic libraries, archives and catalogs or publishing it as part of institute collections and monographs), provided that a full reference to the first original publication in Ars Linguodidacticae is given.
- The policy of the "Ars Linguodidacticae" journal allows and encourages authors to post a manuscript both before and during editorial processing, as this promotes productive scientific discussion and has a positive effect on the speed and dynamics of citing the article.
The editorial board reserves publishing rights to:
- the collated original articles and to the entire issue of the journal.
- the design of the journal and original illustrative and supplementary materials.
- the reprint reprints of the Journal in printed and electronic form.
The copyright policy is carried out according to the terms of the license: Creative Commons "Attribution-NonCommercial" 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
For more information, please read the full text of the CC BY-NC 4.0 Public License.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.