Developing students' language competences in a game-based project with research activities: restoring school engagement

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2663-0303.2025.2.01

Keywords:

project-based learning design, Ukrainian language education, research and interactive activities, natural sciences, school engagement, disciplinary and language literacy

Abstract

Background. School engagement is closely connected to students' active use of language and their participation in classroom communication. In language lessons, engagement depends on opportunities to speak, discuss, and write about topics aligned with students' academic interests. Post-pandemic disruptions and the ongoing full-scale war in Ukraine have intensified emotional, social, and motivational challenges for secondary school students, reducing opportunities for sustained oral and written interaction. Recent international reports indicate that interactive tasks, collaborative projects, and research-oriented learning formats support emotional recovery and school engagement after periods of disrupted schooling (Global Education Cluster, 2024; OECD, 2023). In Ukrainian language education, this calls for learning designs that prioritise meaningful communication over purely formal academic outcomes. For students with strong interests in natural sciences, engagement increases when language lessons enable them to describe, explain, and discuss subject-related phenomena, collaborate in teams, and use Ukrainian as a tool for inquiry and socially relevant project work.

The aim of the article is to present and empirically test a project-based learning design in Ukrainian language classes that combines research tasks with elements of educational play to foster students' language competences and school engagement. The objectives are: (1) to describe the structure of a multi-stage project supporting disciplinary and language literacy; (2) to examine its impact on students' terminological competence and descriptive language skills; (3) to identify language-related difficulties experienced during project work; and (4) to analyse students' subjective perceptions of engagement and collaboration.

Method. The study is grounded in principles of project-based learning with an emphasis on research-oriented and interactive classroom activities. The project was piloted with 22 ninth-grade students from a Ukrainian secondary school who reported sustained interest in natural science subjects. Data collection included pre- and post-project written tests assessing descriptive and terminological competence, analysis of student-created glossaries and texts, an online questionnaire, and a guided reflective discussion. The project design comprised four stages: motivationalpreparatory, research-analytical, creative-language, and reflective-evaluative.

Results and discussion. The findings demonstrate measurable progress in students' ability to use and interpret subject-specific terminology, produce coherent descriptive texts, and apply language as a tool for explaining scientific and environmental phenomena. These outcomes indicate the development of both language literacy and disciplinary literacy, as students used Ukrainian to work with concepts, terminology, and modes of explanation typical of natural science contexts. Role-based collaboration and team competition enhanced emotional and social engagement, while research tasks stimulated purposeful oral and written language use. Students identified terminological interpretation as the most challenging, yet also the most valuable, component of the project. Motivation was driven primarily by task relevance, interdisciplinary connections, and teamwork rather than by grades. Overall, the study confirms that research-based project work enriched with interactive elements supports disciplinary and language literacy and strengthens school engagement in crisis-affected educational settings.

Author Biographies

Olesia Liubashenko, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

PhD, DSc in Education, Full Professor, Department for Teaching Methodology of Ukrainian and Foreign Languages and Literatures

Maryna Drachuk, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

bachelor's student in the programme "Theory of education and teaching methodology of Ukrainian language, literature and a foreign language in basic secondary school"

Alina Kovalenko, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

bachelor's student in the programme "Theory of education and teaching methodology of Ukrainian language, literature and a foreign language in basic secondary school"

References

Bado, N., & Franklin, T. (2014). Cooperative game–based learning in the English as a foreign language classroom. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 2(2). University of Arizona Libraries. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/150765/

Beckett, G. H., & Slater, T. (Eds.). (2019). Global perspectives on project– based language learning, teaching, and assessment: Key approaches, technology tools, and frameworks (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429435096.

Bell, S. (2010). Project–based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415

Benner, A. D., Harrington, M. K., Kealy, C., & Nwafor, C. E. (2025). The COVID– 19 pandemic and adolescents' and young adults' experiences at school: A systematic narrative review. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12935

Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press

Council of Europe. (2015). The language dimension in all subjects: A handbook for curriculum development and teacher training. Council of Europe Publishing. https://rm.coe.int/language-dimensionin-all-subjects/16806af387

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining "gamification". Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 9–15). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040

Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2010). Disciplinary literacies across content areas: Supporting secondary reading through functional language analysis. Journal of adolescent & adult literacy, 53(7), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.53.7.6

Finnish National Board of Education (FNBE). (2016). National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education. https://www.oph.fi/en/education-andqualifications/national-core-curriculum-primary-andlower-secondary-basic-education

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Fredricks, J., McColskey, W., Meli, J., Mordica, J., Montrosse, B., & Mooney, K. (2011). Measuring student engagement in upper elementary through high school: A description of 21 instruments. Issues & Answers Report, REL 2011–No. 098. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs

Global Education Cluster. (2024). Education in emergencies & child protection toolkit. https://eiehub.org

Haddad, T. (2023, May 29). Project-based learning can keep students motivated after the pandemic. San Antonio Report. https://sanantonioreport.org

Herbst, V. S. (2015). A study on collaborative and competitive strategies of learners used in an educational game. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Hualien, Taiwan (pp. 200–204). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2015.99

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2019). Interest development and its relation to curiosity: Needed neuroscientific research. Educational Psychology Review, 31(4), 833–852.

Jerrim, J., & Kaye, N. (2025). The decline in pupils' emotional engagement with school: How does England compare to other countries? CEPEO Working Paper No. 25– 03. UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucl:cepeow:25-03

Meshko, H. M., Meshko, O. I., & Habrusieva, N. V. (2023). The impact of the war in Ukraine on the emotional well–being of students in the learning process. Journal of Intellectual Disability – Diagnosis and Treatment, 11(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292– 2598.2023.11.01.7

Nadyukova, I., & Frenzel, A. C. (2025). Ukrainian teachers' stress and coping during the war: Results from a mixed methods study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 157, 104941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.104941.

OECD. (2023). The state of global education after the pandemic. https://www.oecd.org/education

Palmer, A., & Rodgers, T. S. (1983). Games in language teaching.Language Teaching, 16(1), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800009836

Pearson, P. D., Moje, E., & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science, 328(5977), 459–463. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182595

Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content–area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101

Sutton–Smith, B. (1997). The ambiguity of play. Harvard University Press.

Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Lara–Alecio, R., & Koch, J. (2014). Integrating literacy and science for English language learners: From learning–to–read to reading–to–learn. The Journal of Educational Research, 107(5), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.833072

UNESCO. (2022). Education in crisis and conflict. https://www.unesco.org/en/education/emergencies

UNICEF. (2023). Education in emergencies. https://www.unicef.org/education/emergencies

UNICEF. (2025, February 24). Three years of full– scale war for Ukraine's children. UNICEF Regional Office. https://www.unicef.org/eca/stories/three-years-full-scale-war-ukraines-children

Willis, J. (2020). Research– based strategies to ignite student learning. ASCD.

Караман, С. О., & Філонова, Н. А. (2024). Проєктне навчання як засіб підвищення мотивації учнів 5–6 класів на уроках української мови в умовах освітніх втрат. Теоретична і дидактична філологія, 38, 77– 90.

Новосьолова, В. І. (2022). Адаптація методів навчання української мови до умов воєнного часу. Проблеми сучасного підручника, 28, 90–98. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1309-2022-28-90-98

Wikiwand. (б.д.). Ґрунти Полтавської області. https://www.wikiwand.com/uk/Ґрунти_Полтавської_області

Wikiwand. (б.д. а). Рослинність Полтавської області. https://www.wikiwand.com/uk/Рослинність_Полтавської_області

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Liubashenko, O., Drachuk, M., & Kovalenko, A. (2025). Developing students’ language competences in a game-based project with research activities: restoring school engagement. Ars Linguodidacticae, (16(2), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.17721/2663-0303.2025.2.01

Issue

Section

FUTURE DIRECTIONS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING IN SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES