An integrated framework of oral interaction units for pre-service EFL teacher education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2663-0303.2026.1.03

Keywords:

oral interaction, turn-taking, adjacency pairs, speech acts, talk moves, strategies of oral interaction, ESP talk, pre-service EFL, teacher education

Abstract

This paper offers a theoretical and conceptual analysis of four core units of oral interaction – turns, adjacency pairs, speech acts, and talk moves – to integrate these constructs into a unified framework for EFL communicative professional competence, particularly in ESP classroom talk. Drawing on conversation analysis, speech act theory, pragmatics, and educational linguistics, the study examines how these units, typically treated in isolation across disciplinary traditions, operate as cofunctioning layers within institutional spoken discourse. The analysis shows that turns provide the structural vehicle; adjacency pairs determine sequential coherence; speech acts specify the social action performed; and talk moves operationalize interactional strategies toward professional and pedagogical goals. The article suggests that fluency in this integrated interactional framework constitutes a distinct professional competence that current EFL teacher education programs inadequately address. Eight pedagogical implications are proposed for pre-service EFL teacher preparation, including adjacency-pair awareness, speech-act instruction, talk-move repertoire development, dialogic teaching design, learner interactional agency, cross-cultural interaction norms, and interaction-sensitive oral assessment criteria.

Author Biographies

Tamara Kavytska, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

PhD in Education, Associate Professor. Department for Teaching Methodology of Ukrainian and Foreign Languages and Literatures

Oksana Oliinyk, Volodymyr Vynnychenko Central Ukrainian State University

PhD in Philology, Associate Professor at the Department of Translation, Applied and General Linguistics

References

Alexander, R. J. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). Dialogos.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Clarendon Press; Harvard University Press.

Atwood, S., Turnbull, W., & Carpendale, J. I. M. (2010). The construction of knowledge in classroom talk. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 358–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2010.491856.

Balaobao, A., Calapaan, A. J., Cubero, S. A., & Syting, C. J. (2024). Analyzing teacher-student interaction in English-medium classrooms: Flanders' and initiation-response-feedback model in focus. Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature, 4 (1), 132–154. https://doi.org/10.54012/jcell.v4i1.318.

Cheng, W. (2016). Exploring the adjacency pair. In W. Cheng & K. C. C. Kong (Eds.), Professional communication: Collaboration between academics and practitioners (pp. 25–42). Hong Kong University Press.

Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st-century skills. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 51–76). Solution Tree Press.

Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2014). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. Routledge.

Estaji, M., & Mirzaei Shojakhanlou, M. (2022). Realization of initiation, response, and feedback in teacher-student interactions in EFL classrooms: Learning realities and opportunities. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 14(30), 91–114. https://doi.org/10.22034/ELT.2022.53522.2510.

Gardner, R. (2019). Classroom interaction research: The state of the art. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(3), 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631037

Hall, J. K. (2022). L2 classroom interaction and its links to L2 learners' developing L2 linguistic repertoires: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 55(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000397.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. MacMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Pearson.

McCarthy, M., & McCarten, J. (2019). Interaction management in academic speaking. Linx, 79. https://doi.org/10.4000/linx.3611.

Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. Routledge.

Michaels, S., & O'Connor, C. (2015). Conceptualizing talk moves as tools: Professional development approaches for academically productive discussions. In L. B. Resnick, C. Asterhan, & S. N. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through talk and dialogue (pp. 333–347). American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-43-1_27.

Myklebust, H., & Guadie, M. A. (2024). Following up: Questions and talk moves in preservice teachers' mathematics classroom conversations. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(3), 1001–1018. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.3.1001.

O'Connor, C., & Michaels, S. (2017). Supporting teachers in taking up productive talk moves: The long road to professional learning at scale. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.11.003.

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243.

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.

Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford University Press.

Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Rossano, F., de Ruiter, J. P., Yoon, K.-E., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10587–10592. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903616106.

Tannen, D. (1984). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Ablex.

Varpio, L., Paradis, E., Uijtdehaage, S., & Young, M. (2017). The distinctions between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework. Academic Medicine, 95(7), 989–994. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002303.

Walsh, S. (2014). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Routledge.

Young, R. F. (2013). Learning to talk the talk and walk the walk: Interactional competence in academic spoken English. Ibérica, 25, 15–38. http://www.redalyc.org/ articulo.oa?id=287026237002

Downloads

Published

2026-05-27

How to Cite

Kavytska, T., & Oliinyk, O. (2026). An integrated framework of oral interaction units for pre-service EFL teacher education. ARS LINGUODIDACTICAE, (17(01), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.17721/2663-0303.2026.1.03

Issue

Section

METHODOLOGY OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION