SOCIAL AND INFORMATIONAL STATUS OF MASS COMMUNICATION DOCUMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2409-9805.3.2018.150920Keywords:
document, mass communication document, mass media, convergenceAbstract
The purpose of the article is to substantiate the trends in the evolution of the social and informational status of a document in the context of structural and functional modernization of mass media. To achieve the goal, the main tasks are to determine the role and significance of the convergence factors of mass media modernization, to establish the trends of developing the functional and typological structure of mass communication documents. The methodology of the research consists in using general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis, logical approach, which has made it possible to substantiate the decisive significance of convergence factors in the modernization of the mass media system, to establish the characteristic features of the development of its functional and typological structure. The scientific novelty of the work is that the article elaborates upon the modern theory of the document about the role of convergence in modernizing functional and typological structure of mass communication documents. Conclusions. The development of the mass communication documents system takes place according to the transformational pattern, the decisive factors of which are convergence processes. There is a radical structural and functional modernization of the mass media, the primary manifestations of which are the expansion of the scope of traditional and the emergence of new mass media functions, the development of their typological structure, the rise of new types of documents.
References
Вартанова Е. Л. Конвергенция как неизбежность От книги до Интернета. Журналистика на рубеже нового тысячелетия. Москва : Изд-во МГУ, 2000. С. 42–44.
Караева В. А., Точилина А. А. Коммуникационная конвергенция журналистики, рекламы и ПР. Вестник Москов. ун-та. 2009. No 2. С. 242–256.
Карякина К. А. Актуальные формы и типологические модели новых медиа. Вестник Москов. ун-та. 2010. No 3. С. 128–137.
Кузнєцова Т. Аксіологія медіатексту : основні напрямки дослідження Світові стандарти сучасної журналістики. Черкаси, 2010. С. 198–202.
Порфімович О. Л. Імідж і влада. Київ : КНУ ім. Т. Шевченка. Ін-т журналістики, 2007. 80 с.
Потятиник Б. Медіа : ключі до розуміння. Львів : ПАІС, 2004. 312 с.
ПрайсМ. Телевидение, телекоммуникации и переходный период : право, общество и национальная идентичность. Москва : Изд-во Моск. ун-та, 2000. 352 с.
Bell D. The end of Ideology : On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties. Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press, 2000. P. 113.
Börjesson L. Beyond information policy: Conflicting documentation ideals in extra-academic knowledge making practices. Journal of Documentation. 2016. Vol. 72 (4). P. 674–695.
Carter D. Infrastructure and the experience of documents. Journal of Documentation. 2016. Vol. 72 (1). P. 65–80.
Choksy C.E.B. The role of documents in the U.S. Journal of Documentation. 2015. Vol.71 (5). P. 867–883.
Faucher K.X. An information meta-state approach to documentation. Journal of Documentation. 2014. Vol. 70 (4). P. 503–525.
Gorichanaz T., Latham K.F. Document phenomenology: a framework for holistic analysis. Journal of Documentation. 2016. Vol. 72 (6). P. 1114–1133.
Hansson J. Professional value and ethical self-regulation in the development of modern librarianship: The documentality of library ethics. Journal of Documentation. 2017. Vol. 73 (6). P. 1261–1280.
Hedstrom M. Digital preservation: a time bomb for digital libraries. Computers and the Humanities. 1997. Vol. 31 (3). Р. 189–202.
Simondon G. L’individu et sa genèse physico-biologique (l’individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information). Paris : PUF, 1964.
Trace C.B. Ethnomethodology: Foundational insights on the nature and meaning of documents in everyday life. Journal of Documentation. 2016. Vol. 72 (1). P. 47–64.
Zacklad М. Réseaux et communautés d’imaginaire documédiatisées. A Document (Re)turn. Peter Lang, 2007. P. 279–297.
Vartanova E. L. (2000). Convergence as inevitable. Vot knigi v Interneta. Zhurnalistika na rubezhe novogo tysyacheletiya. Moskva, Izdatel'stvo MGU [in Russian].
Karayeva V.A., Tochilina A.A. (2009). The communication convergence of journalism, advertising and PR. Vestnik Moskov. un-ta. 2, 242 – 256 [in Russian].
Karyakina K.A. (2010). Actual forms and typological models of new media. Vestnik Moskov. un-ta. 3, 128 – 137 [in Russian].
Kuznyetsova T. (2010). Axiology of media text: the main directions of research. Svitovi standarty suchasnoyi zhurnalistyky. Cherkasy [in Ukrainian].
Porfimovych O. L. (2007). Image and power. Kyyiv, KNU im. T. Shevchenka [in Ukrainian]
Potyatynyk B. (2004). Media: Keys to Understanding. Lviv: PAIS [in Ukrainian].
Prays M. (2000). Television, Telecommunications and Transition: Law, Society and National Identity. Moskva, Izdatel'stvo MGU [in Russian].
Bell D. (2000). The end of Ideology : On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties. Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.
Börjesson L. (2016). Beyond information policy: Conflicting documentation ideals in extra-academic knowledge making practices. Journal of Documentation. 72 (4), 674–695.
Carter D. (2016). Infrastructure and the experience of documents. Journal of Documentation. 72 (1), 65–80.
Choksy C.E.B. (2015). The role of documents in the U.S. Journal of Documentation. 71 (5), 867–883.
FaucherK.X. (2014). An information meta-state approach to documentation. Journal of Documentation. 70 (4), 503–525.
Gorichanaz T., Latham K.F. (2016). Document phenomenology: a framework for holistic analysis. Journal of Documentation. 72 (6), 1114–1133.
Hansson J. (2017). Professional value and ethical self-regulation in the development of modern librarianship: The documentality of library ethics. Journal of Documentation. 73 (6), 1261–1280.
Hedstrom M. (1997). Digital preservation: a time bomb for digital libraries. Computers and the Humanities. 31 (3), 189–202.
Simondon G. (1964). L’individu et sa genèse physico-biologique (l’individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information). Paris, PUF, 1964.
Trace C.B. (2016). Ethnomethodology: Foundational insights on the nature and meaning of documents in everyday life. Journal of Documentation. 72 (1), 47–64.
Zacklad М. (2007). Réseaux et communautés d’imaginaire documédiatisées. A Document (Re)turn. Peter Lang.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Maria Komova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
