Information Activity in the Era of Digital Media as a Factor in Forming Social Senses

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2409-9805.1.2026.356342

Keywords:

information activity, digital media, social communications, sense-making, social meanings

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to analyse information activity in the digital media space as a key mechanism for forming social meanings, as well as to comprehend the impact of platform communications, algorithmic content selection and mediatised interaction practices on the transformation of social discourses and communicative reality. The methodological basis of the study is informational and socio-communicative approaches, which make it possible to analyse information activity as a complex socio-cultural process. Systemic and structural-functional analysis is used to identify the role of digital media in the formation of social meanings; discursive analysis is used to comprehend the mechanisms of sense-making in digital communications. Scientific novelty. Information activity is considered as a sociocultural practice of sense-making, which is formed in the interaction of users, digital media and algorithmic mechanisms of platforms. It is substantiated that social meanings in the digital environment arise not only in the process of interpersonal communication, but also as a result of algorithmically structured visibility of information flows. Conclusions. The digital era has transformed information activity into a sociocultural practice of sense-making, within which information ceases to be a neutral resource and acquires meaning only through the processes of interpretation, selection and social interaction. Digital media act as key agents of social sense-making, as they combine users’ communicative practices with algorithmically structured information flows that determine the visibility, priority and contextualisation of content. As a result, information activity takes place in conditions of structured visibility, when meanings are not only produced, but also hierarchised, which directly affects the formation of public perceptions, collective identities, social discourses, personal identity. Therefore, digital media should be considered not as neutral channels of communication, but as active institutional environments integrated into the processes of constructing the social reality of modern society and the corresponding information activity.

References

Aharkov, O. (2023). Individuality in the digital age: how social networks affect self-identification and social behaviour. Dnipro Scientific Journal of Public Administration, Psychology, Law, 1, 73–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2023.1.12 [in Ukrainian].

Byrkovych, T., & Vilchynska, I. (2023). Information and communication activities of libraries of Ukraine in wartime. Library science. Document science. Informology, 4, 42–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32461/2409-9805.4.2023.293970 [in Ukrainian].

Danko-Sliptsova, A., Kovalenko, N., & Zhornokui, U. (2024). The influence of social networks on the formation of public opinion during crisis situations: a sociological aspect. Scientific notes of the V. I. Vernadskyi TNU. Series: Philology. Journalism, 35 (74), 3, 218–226. DOI https://doi.org/10.32782/2710-4656/2024.3.2/35 [in Ukrainian].

Denysiuk, Z., & Yakovlev, O. (2021). Formation of information culture of society in conditions of digitalisation. Herald of the National Academy of Culture and Arts Management, 2, 18–22 [in Ukrainian].

Dobrovolska, V., & Cherednyk, L. (2023) Innovative activity of libraries in the conditions of a digital society. Library science. Document science. Informology, 1, 5–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32461/2409-9805.1.2023.276758 [in Ukrainian].

Kyrychenko, M. O. (2017). Information consciousness of the individual as a social phenomenon. Problems of social work: philosophy, psychology, sociology, 2(10), 56–62 [in Ukrainian].

Boulianne, S., & Hoffmann, C. P. (2024). Digital Inclusion Through Algorithmic Knowledge: Curated Flows of Civic and Political Information on Instagram. Practices of Digital In- and Exclusion in Everyday Life, 14, 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8102 [in English].

Castells, M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell [in English].

Couldry, N. (2012). Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media Practice. Polity Press [in English].

Das, S. (2023). The Digital Duality: Social Media’s Impact on Society. Communication, and Language. Journal of Communication and Management, 2(04), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.58966/JCM2023245 [in English].

Dudar, V., & Liashchenko, Y. (2024). Effects of social communications on identity development in the online environment: Theoretical and historical perspectives. Society. Document. Communication. DOI:10.69587/sdc/3.2024.45 [in English].

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. NYU Press [in English].

Pérez-Torres, V. (2024). Social media: a digital social mirror for identity development during adolescence. Current Psychology, 43, 22170–22180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05980-z [in English].

Spier, S. (2025). The Politics of Platform Technologies: A Critical Conceptualization of the Platform and Sharing Economy. Philosophy & Technology, P.1–23. DOI: 10.1007/s13347-025-00840-5 [in English].

van Dijck, J., Poell, T., de Waal, M. (2018). The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford University Press [in English].

Walter, C. E., & Friesike, S. (2025). Behind the screens: how algorithmic imaginaries shape science content on social media. Journal of Science Communication, 24 (2). A02. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.24020202 [in English].

Published

2026-03-31

Issue

Section

Статті